issue_comments
13 rows where issue = 1435917503 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Errors when using table filters behind a proxy · 13 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1311437901 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1883#issuecomment-1311437901 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1883 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OKvRN | mattmalcher 31312775 | 2022-11-11T09:20:21Z | 2022-11-11T09:20:21Z | NONE | Amazing - thank you for fixing and releasing that so quickly and for showing your process! <3 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Errors when using table filters behind a proxy 1435917503 | |
1311314981 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1883#issuecomment-1311314981 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1883 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OKRQl | simonw 9599 | 2022-11-11T07:15:48Z | 2022-11-11T07:15:48Z | OWNER | I released that fix in Datasette 0.63.1: https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/changelog.html#v0-63-1 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Errors when using table filters behind a proxy 1435917503 | |
1311299535 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1883#issuecomment-1311299535 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1883 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OKNfP | simonw 9599 | 2022-11-11T06:54:58Z | 2022-11-11T06:54:58Z | OWNER | This time deployed with:
And that fixed it!
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Errors when using table filters behind a proxy 1435917503 | |
1311292463 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1883#issuecomment-1311292463 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1883 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OKLwv | simonw 9599 | 2022-11-11T06:44:24Z | 2022-11-11T06:44:24Z | OWNER | Modifying that test to the following does indeed cause a failure:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Errors when using table filters behind a proxy 1435917503 | |
1311291632 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1883#issuecomment-1311291632 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1883 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OKLjw | simonw 9599 | 2022-11-11T06:43:00Z | 2022-11-11T06:43:00Z | OWNER | https://datasette-apache-proxy-demo.datasette.io/prefix/-/asgi-scope is useful: It confirms that
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Errors when using table filters behind a proxy 1435917503 | |
1311290115 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1883#issuecomment-1311290115 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1883 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OKLMD | simonw 9599 | 2022-11-11T06:40:14Z | 2022-11-11T06:41:56Z | OWNER | I modified that config file to have this line instead:
This does NOT seem to have fixed the bug:
https://datasette-apache-proxy-demo.datasette.io/prefix/-/versions seems to confirm that this is the latest deployed version (0.63), so it looks like the deploy worked. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Errors when using table filters behind a proxy 1435917503 | |
1311286593 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1883#issuecomment-1311286593 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1883 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OKKVB | simonw 9599 | 2022-11-11T06:34:09Z | 2022-11-11T06:34:09Z | OWNER | https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_proxy.html#proxypass includes this note:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Errors when using table filters behind a proxy 1435917503 | |
1311284537 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1883#issuecomment-1311284537 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1883 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OKJ05 | simonw 9599 | 2022-11-11T06:30:38Z | 2022-11-11T06:30:38Z | OWNER | Is there a chance that it's Apache that's messing with that |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Errors when using table filters behind a proxy 1435917503 | |
1311283301 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1883#issuecomment-1311283301 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1883 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OKJhl | simonw 9599 | 2022-11-11T06:28:38Z | 2022-11-11T06:29:33Z | OWNER |
https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/bbaab3b38ec2ce5944239ffbe2dd53328df40fff/datasette/utils/init.py#L273-L286 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Errors when using table filters behind a proxy 1435917503 | |
1311282970 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1883#issuecomment-1311282970 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1883 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OKJca | simonw 9599 | 2022-11-11T06:28:05Z | 2022-11-11T06:28:05Z | OWNER | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Errors when using table filters behind a proxy 1435917503 | ||
1311280709 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1883#issuecomment-1311280709 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1883 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OKI5F | simonw 9599 | 2022-11-11T06:25:27Z | 2022-11-11T06:25:27Z | OWNER | I tried adding this test but it passed! I expected it to fail:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Errors when using table filters behind a proxy 1435917503 | |
1311278678 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1883#issuecomment-1311278678 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1883 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OKIZW | simonw 9599 | 2022-11-11T06:22:37Z | 2022-11-11T06:22:37Z | OWNER | If you view source on that page the HTML looks correct: ```html <form class="filters" action="/prefix/fixtures/binary_data" method="get"> ``` (I just added a test that confirms this too.) But... it looks like the bug is in the redirection code. https://datasette-apache-proxy-demo.datasette.io/prefix/fixtures/binary_data?_filter_column=rowid&_filter_op=exact&_filter_value=1&_sort=rowid returns the following: location: /fixtures/binary_data?_sort=rowid&rowid__exact=1 Which is incorrect. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Errors when using table filters behind a proxy 1435917503 | |
1311273461 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1883#issuecomment-1311273461 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1883 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5OKHH1 | simonw 9599 | 2022-11-11T06:16:08Z | 2022-11-11T06:16:08Z | OWNER | Great catch, thanks! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Errors when using table filters behind a proxy 1435917503 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2