issue_comments

Table actions

2 rows where issue = 1891614971 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

issue 1

  • Represent compound foreign keys in table.foreign_keys output · 2 ✖

author_association 1

id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
1714920708 https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/594#issuecomment-1714920708 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/594 IC_kwDOCGYnMM5mN50E simonw 9599 2023-09-12T03:51:13Z 2023-09-12T03:51:13Z OWNER

Changing this without breaking backwards compatibility (and forcing a 4.0 release) will be tricky, because ForeignKey() is a namedtuple:

https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/622c3a5a7dd53a09c029e2af40c2643fe7579340/sqlite_utils/db.py#L148-L150

I could swap it out for a dataclass and add those extra columns, but I need to make sure that code like this still works: python for table, column, other_table, other_column in table.foreign_keys: # ...

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Represent compound foreign keys in table.foreign_keys output 1891614971  
1714919806 https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/594#issuecomment-1714919806 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/594 IC_kwDOCGYnMM5mN5l- simonw 9599 2023-09-12T03:49:41Z 2023-09-12T03:49:41Z OWNER

Digging in a bit more: ```pycon

pprint(list(db.query('PRAGMA foreign_key_list(courses)'))) [{'from': 'campus_name', 'id': 0, 'match': 'NONE', 'on_delete': 'NO ACTION', 'on_update': 'NO ACTION', 'seq': 0, 'table': 'departments', 'to': 'campus_name'}, {'from': 'dept_code', 'id': 0, 'match': 'NONE', 'on_delete': 'NO ACTION', 'on_update': 'NO ACTION', 'seq': 1, 'table': 'departments', 'to': 'dept_code'}] `` I think the way you tell it's a compound foreign key is that both of those have the sameidvalue - of0- but they then have two differentseqvalues of0and1`.

Right now I ignore those columns entirely: https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/622c3a5a7dd53a09c029e2af40c2643fe7579340/sqlite_utils/db.py#L1523-L1540

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Represent compound foreign keys in table.foreign_keys output 1891614971  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
                ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
                ON [issue_comments] ([user]);