issue_comments
3 rows where issue = 276091279 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- apsw as alternative sqlite3 binding (for full text search) · 3 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
392606044 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/144#issuecomment-392606044 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/144 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5MjYwNjA0NA== | simonw 9599 | 2018-05-28T21:29:42Z | 2018-05-28T21:29:42Z | OWNER | The other major limitation of APSW is its treatment of unicode: https://rogerbinns.github.io/apsw/types.html - it tells you that it is your responsibility to ensure that TEXT columns in your SQLite database are correctly encoded. Since Datasette is designed to work against ANY SQLite database that someone may have already created, I see that as a show-stopping limitation. Thanks to https://github.com/coleifer/sqlite-vtfunc I now have a working mechanism for virtual tables (I've even built a demo plugin with them - https://github.com/simonw/datasette-sql-scraper ) which was the main thing that interested me about APSW. I'm going to close this as WONTFIX - I think Python's built-in |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
apsw as alternative sqlite3 binding (for full text search) 276091279 | |
346427794 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/144#issuecomment-346427794 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/144 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0NjQyNzc5NA== | mhalle 649467 | 2017-11-22T17:55:45Z | 2017-11-22T17:55:45Z | NONE | Thanks. There is a way to use pip to grab apsw, which also let's you configure it (flags to build extensions, use an internal sqlite, etc). Don't know how that works as a dependency for another package, though. On November 22, 2017 11:38:06 AM EST, Simon Willison notifications@github.com wrote:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
apsw as alternative sqlite3 binding (for full text search) 276091279 | |
346405660 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/144#issuecomment-346405660 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/144 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0NjQwNTY2MA== | simonw 9599 | 2017-11-22T16:38:05Z | 2017-11-22T16:38:05Z | OWNER | I have a solution for FTS already, but I'm interested in apsw as a mechanism for allowing custom virtual tables to be written in Python (pysqlite only lets you write custom functions) Not having PyPI support is pretty tough though. I'm planning a plugin/extension system which would be ideal for things like an optional apsw mode, but that's a lot harder if apsw isn't in PyPI. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
apsw as alternative sqlite3 binding (for full text search) 276091279 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2