issue_comments
4 rows where issue = 324162476 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Mechanism for automatically picking up changes when on-disk .db file changes · 4 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
453262703 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/271#issuecomment-453262703 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/271 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1MzI2MjcwMw== | simonw 9599 | 2019-01-10T21:35:18Z | 2019-01-10T21:35:18Z | OWNER | It turns out this was much easier to support than I expected: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/commit/eac08f0dfc61a99e8887442fc247656d419c76f8 |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 1, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Mechanism for automatically picking up changes when on-disk .db file changes 324162476 | |
398133924 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/271#issuecomment-398133924 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/271 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5ODEzMzkyNA== | simonw 9599 | 2018-06-18T17:32:22Z | 2018-06-18T17:32:22Z | OWNER | As seen in #316 inspect is already taking a VERY long time to run against large (600GB) databases. To get this working I may have to make inspect an optional optimization and run introspection for columns and primary keys in demand. The one catch here is the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Mechanism for automatically picking up changes when on-disk .db file changes 324162476 | |
389989615 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/271#issuecomment-389989615 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/271 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4OTk4OTYxNQ== | simonw 9599 | 2018-05-17T19:56:13Z | 2018-05-17T19:56:13Z | OWNER | From https://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/open.html
So this would probably have to be a new mode, |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Mechanism for automatically picking up changes when on-disk .db file changes 324162476 | |
389989015 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/271#issuecomment-389989015 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/271 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4OTk4OTAxNQ== | simonw 9599 | 2018-05-17T19:54:10Z | 2018-05-17T19:54:10Z | OWNER | This is a departure from how Datasette has been designed so far, and it may turn out that it's not feasible or it requires too many philosophical changes to be worthwhile. If we CAN do it though it would mean Datasette could stay running pointed at a directory on disk and new SQLite databases could be dropped into that directory by another process and served directly as they become available. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Mechanism for automatically picking up changes when on-disk .db file changes 324162476 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1