issue_comments
4 rows where issue = 447408527 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date)
issue 1
- Option to facet by date using month or year · 4 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
495080591 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/483#issuecomment-495080591 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/483 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5NTA4MDU5MQ== | simonw 9599 | 2019-05-23T06:07:53Z | 2019-05-23T06:09:05Z | OWNER | As far as URL design goes... I'm going to stick with
Where interval can be day (the default), month or year. And maybe week? Not sure about that. Still not sure what/if I should do about exposing these options in the UI. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Option to facet by date using month or year 447408527 | |
495080390 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/483#issuecomment-495080390 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/483 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5NTA4MDM5MA== | simonw 9599 | 2019-05-23T06:06:53Z | 2019-05-23T06:06:53Z | OWNER | Yes there's definitely something exciting to be done with location facets. The easiest one would be a radius-distance-from-a-point facet (5km, 10km etc). A more sophisticated thing might be possible on top of GeoJSON and SpatiaLite - that's probably something I would put in a plugin rather than shipping in Datasette itself. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Option to facet by date using month or year 447408527 | |
495032933 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/483#issuecomment-495032933 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/483 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5NTAzMjkzMw== | simonw 9599 | 2019-05-23T01:28:45Z | 2019-05-23T01:28:45Z | OWNER | Would this be useful for other facets? How many facet types are likely to have a small number of options that could be linked to in this way? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Option to facet by date using month or year 447408527 | |
495032818 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/483#issuecomment-495032818 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/483 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5NTAzMjgxOA== | simonw 9599 | 2019-05-23T01:28:06Z | 2019-05-23T01:28:06Z | OWNER | Here's a UI concept: |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Option to facet by date using month or year 447408527 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1