issue_comments
7 rows where issue = 449886319 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Rename metadata.json to config.json · 7 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1689128911 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/493#issuecomment-1689128911 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/493 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c5krg_P | simonw 9599 | 2023-08-23T01:29:20Z | 2023-08-23T01:29:20Z | OWNER | It's going to be called
|
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Rename metadata.json to config.json 449886319 | |
| 748305976 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/493#issuecomment-748305976 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/493 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0ODMwNTk3Ng== | jefftriplett 50527 | 2020-12-18T20:34:39Z | 2020-12-18T20:34:39Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I can't keep up with the renaming contexts, but I like having the ability to run datasette+ datasette-ripgrep against different configs:
I have one for all of my code and one per client who has lots of code. So as long as I can point to datasette to something, it's easy to work with. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Rename metadata.json to config.json 449886319 | |
| 747966232 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/493#issuecomment-747966232 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/493 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0Nzk2NjIzMg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-18T09:19:41Z | 2020-12-18T09:19:41Z | OWNER | Is there any reason to keep |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Rename metadata.json to config.json 449886319 | |
| 735281577 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/493#issuecomment-735281577 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/493 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczNTI4MTU3Nw== | jefftriplett 50527 | 2020-11-28T19:39:53Z | 2020-11-28T19:39:53Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I was confused by A short term solution might be pointing out in plugins that their snippet json can go in |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Rename metadata.json to config.json 449886319 | |
| 640924558 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/493#issuecomment-640924558 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/493 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDkyNDU1OA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T22:40:01Z | 2020-06-08T22:40:01Z | OWNER | I'll also rename |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Rename metadata.json to config.json 449886319 | |
| 640924482 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/493#issuecomment-640924482 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/493 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MDkyNDQ4Mg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-06-08T22:39:45Z | 2020-06-08T22:39:45Z | OWNER | I'm definitely doing this rename, now that |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Rename metadata.json to config.json 449886319 | |
| 566265079 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/493#issuecomment-566265079 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/493 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU2NjI2NTA3OQ== | simonw 9599 | 2019-12-16T22:04:05Z | 2019-12-16T22:04:05Z | OWNER | This is particularly relevant as plugins increasingly use |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Rename metadata.json to config.json 449886319 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2