issue_comments

Table actions

5 rows where issue = 463544206 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • simonw · 5 ✖

issue 1

  • Populate "endpoint" key in ASGI scope · 5 ✖

author_association 1

id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
513317952 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/537#issuecomment-513317952 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/537 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMzMxNzk1Mg== simonw 9599 2019-07-19T17:49:06Z 2019-07-19T17:49:06Z OWNER

It strikes me that if scope is indeed meant to stay immutable the alternative way of solving this would be to add an outbound custom request header with the endpoint - X-Endpoint: datasette.views.table.TableView for example - and teach the Sentry plugin to optionally read that.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Populate "endpoint" key in ASGI scope 463544206  
513307487 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/537#issuecomment-513307487 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/537 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMzMwNzQ4Nw== simonw 9599 2019-07-19T17:17:43Z 2019-07-19T17:17:43Z OWNER

Huh, interesting. I'd got it into my head that scope should not be mutated under any circumstances - if that's not true and it's mutable there's all kinds of useful things we could do with it.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Populate "endpoint" key in ASGI scope 463544206  
513273003 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/537#issuecomment-513273003 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/537 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMzI3MzAwMw== simonw 9599 2019-07-19T15:28:42Z 2019-07-19T15:28:42Z OWNER 
{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 1,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Populate "endpoint" key in ASGI scope 463544206  
513272392 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/537#issuecomment-513272392 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/537 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMzI3MjM5Mg== simonw 9599 2019-07-19T15:27:03Z 2019-07-19T15:27:03Z OWNER

Yeah that's a good call: the Datasette plugin mechanism where middleware is wrapped around the outside doesn't appear to be compatible with the Sentry mechanism of expecting that scope has been populated before it gets to their error handler.

@tomchristie is this something you've thought about?

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Populate "endpoint" key in ASGI scope 463544206  
512664216 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/537#issuecomment-512664216 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/537 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMjY2NDIxNg== simonw 9599 2019-07-18T04:53:18Z 2019-07-18T04:53:18Z OWNER

Yes, TableView is desirable here I think. Maybe datasette.views.table.TableView if we can get that somehow. Thanks for taking a look!

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Populate "endpoint" key in ASGI scope 463544206  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
                ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
                ON [issue_comments] ([user]);