issue_comments
6 rows where issue = 488833975 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Command for running a search and saving tweets for that search · 6 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 549228535 | https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/3#issuecomment-549228535 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/3 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0OTIyODUzNQ== | simonw 9599 | 2019-11-04T05:31:55Z | 2019-11-04T05:31:55Z | MEMBER | {
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Command for running a search and saving tweets for that search 488833975 | ||
| 549226399 | https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/3#issuecomment-549226399 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/3 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0OTIyNjM5OQ== | simonw 9599 | 2019-11-04T05:11:57Z | 2019-11-04T05:11:57Z | MEMBER | I'm going to add a |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Command for running a search and saving tweets for that search 488833975 | |
| 549096321 | https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/3#issuecomment-549096321 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/3 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0OTA5NjMyMQ== | simonw 9599 | 2019-11-03T01:27:55Z | 2019-11-03T01:28:17Z | MEMBER | It would be neat if this could support |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Command for running a search and saving tweets for that search 488833975 | |
| 543290744 | https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/3#issuecomment-543290744 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/3 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0MzI5MDc0NA== | simonw 9599 | 2019-10-17T17:57:14Z | 2019-10-17T17:57:14Z | MEMBER | I have a working command now. I'm going to ship it early because it could do with some other people trying it out. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Command for running a search and saving tweets for that search 488833975 | |
| 543273540 | https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/3#issuecomment-543273540 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/3 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0MzI3MzU0MA== | simonw 9599 | 2019-10-17T17:12:51Z | 2019-10-17T17:12:51Z | MEMBER | Just importing tweets here isn't enough - how are we supposed to know which tweets were imported by which search? So I think the right thing to do here is to also create a |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Command for running a search and saving tweets for that search 488833975 | |
| 541493242 | https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/3#issuecomment-541493242 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/3 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0MTQ5MzI0Mg== | simonw 9599 | 2019-10-14T03:35:36Z | 2019-10-14T03:35:36Z | MEMBER | {
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Command for running a search and saving tweets for that search 488833975 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1