issue_comments
5 rows where issue = 509340359 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Don't auto-format SQL on page load · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
544214418 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/601#issuecomment-544214418 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/601 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0NDIxNDQxOA== | rixx 2657547 | 2019-10-20T02:29:49Z | 2019-10-20T02:29:49Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Submitted in #602! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Don't auto-format SQL on page load 509340359 | |
544014518 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/601#issuecomment-544014518 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/601 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0NDAxNDUxOA== | simonw 9599 | 2019-10-18T23:57:44Z | 2019-10-18T23:57:44Z | OWNER | That's a good idea. It could even be smart about it and only show the "Format SQL" button on that page of the output of the function would differ from what's there already. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Don't auto-format SQL on page load 509340359 | |
544008944 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/601#issuecomment-544008944 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/601 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0NDAwODk0NA== | rixx 2657547 | 2019-10-18T23:40:48Z | 2019-10-18T23:40:48Z | CONTRIBUTOR | The only negative impact that comes to mind is that now you have no way to get the read-only query to be formatted nicely, I think, so maybe a second PR adding the formatting functionality even to the read-only page would be good? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Don't auto-format SQL on page load 509340359 | |
544008463 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/601#issuecomment-544008463 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/601 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0NDAwODQ2Mw== | rixx 2657547 | 2019-10-18T23:39:21Z | 2019-10-18T23:39:21Z | CONTRIBUTOR | That looks right, and I completely agree with the intent. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Don't auto-format SQL on page load 509340359 | |
543986312 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/601#issuecomment-543986312 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/601 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0Mzk4NjMxMg== | simonw 9599 | 2019-10-18T22:38:00Z | 2019-10-18T22:38:00Z | OWNER | @rixx does this look like the right way to do #600 to you? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Don't auto-format SQL on page load 509340359 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2