issue_comments
5 rows where issue = 590669793 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Feature: record history of follower counts · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
607019151 | https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/40#issuecomment-607019151 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/40 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwNzAxOTE1MQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-04-01T04:11:10Z | 2020-04-01T04:11:10Z | MEMBER | In testing this collects a LOT of data. I'm going to skip tracking favourites_count and statuses_count and just track followers, friends and listed instead. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Feature: record history of follower counts 590669793 | |
607011421 | https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/40#issuecomment-607011421 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/40 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwNzAxMTQyMQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-04-01T03:47:37Z | 2020-04-01T03:55:08Z | MEMBER | Actually a single table with a In which case the compound primary key would be |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Feature: record history of follower counts 590669793 | |
607011972 | https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/40#issuecomment-607011972 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/40 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwNzAxMTk3Mg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-04-01T03:49:02Z | 2020-04-01T03:50:01Z | MEMBER | I want the datetime value to look like
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Feature: record history of follower counts 590669793 | |
606307376 | https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/40#issuecomment-606307376 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/40 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwNjMwNzM3Ng== | simonw 9599 | 2020-03-30T23:35:40Z | 2020-03-30T23:39:15Z | MEMBER | I think five separate tables:
Each with the following structure:
I'm tempted to have a compound primary key here - user, datetime |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Feature: record history of follower counts 590669793 | |
606307019 | https://github.com/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/40#issuecomment-606307019 | https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/40 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwNjMwNzAxOQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-03-30T23:34:27Z | 2020-03-30T23:34:27Z | MEMBER | The count properties available for a user are:
May as well track history for all of them? Should be pretty cheap to store. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Feature: record history of follower counts 590669793 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1