issue_comments

Table actions

2 rows where issue = 695556681 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

issue 1

  • Figure out incremental re-indexing · 2 ✖

author_association 1

id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
688626037 https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/19#issuecomment-688626037 https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/19 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4ODYyNjAzNw== simonw 9599 2020-09-08T05:27:07Z 2020-09-08T05:27:07Z MEMBER

A really clever way to do this would be with triggers. The indexer script would add triggers to each of the database tables that it is indexing - each in their own database.

Those triggers would then maintain a _index_queue_ table. This table would record the primary key of rows that are added, modified or deleted. The indexer could then work by reading through the _index_queue_ table, re-indexing (or deleting) just the primary keys listed there, and then emptying the queue once it has finished.

This would add a small amount of overhead to insert/update/delete queries run against the table. My hunch is that the overhead would be miniscule, but I could still allow people to opt-out for tables that are so high traffic that this would matter.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Figure out incremental re-indexing 695556681  
688625430 https://github.com/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/19#issuecomment-688625430 https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/19 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4ODYyNTQzMA== simonw 9599 2020-09-08T05:24:50Z 2020-09-08T05:24:50Z MEMBER

I thought about allowing tables to define a incremental indexing SQL query - maybe something that can return just records touched in the past hour, or records since a recorded "last indexed record" value.

The problem with this is deletes - if you delete a record, how does the indexer know to remove it? See #18 - that's already caused problems.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Figure out incremental re-indexing 695556681  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
                ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
                ON [issue_comments] ([user]);