issue_comments

Table actions

2 rows where issue = 712260429, "updated_at" is on date 2021-01-03 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • simonw · 2 ✖

issue 1

  • JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy · 2 ✖

author_association 1

id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
753690280 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-753690280 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MzY5MDI4MA== simonw 9599 2021-01-03T23:13:30Z 2021-01-03T23:13:30Z OWNER

Oh that's interesting, I hadn't thought about plugins firing events - just responding to events fired by the rest of the application.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429  
753570710 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-753570710 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/983 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1MzU3MDcxMA== simonw 9599 2021-01-03T05:29:56Z 2021-01-03T05:29:56Z OWNER

I thought about using browser events, but they don't quite match the API that I'm looking to provide. In particular, the great thing about Pluggy is that if you have multiple handlers registered for a specific plugin hook each of those handlers can return a value, and Pluggy will combine those values into a list of replies.

This is great for things like plugin hooks that add extra menu items - each plugin can return a menu item (maybe as a label/URL/click-callback object) and the calling code can then add all of those items to the menu. See https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/plugin_hooks.html#table-actions-datasette-actor-database-table for a Python example.

I'm on the fence about relying on JavaScript modules. I need to think about browser compatibility for them - but I'm already commited to requiring support for () => {} arrow functions so maybe I'm committed to module support too already?

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 JavaScript plugin hooks mechanism similar to pluggy 712260429  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
                ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
                ON [issue_comments] ([user]);