issue_comments
5 rows where issue = 722738988 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- How should datasette.client interact with base_url · 5 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 719959754 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1026#issuecomment-719959754 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1026 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcxOTk1OTc1NA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-10-31T16:56:35Z | 2020-10-31T16:56:35Z | OWNER | 1041 can also benefit from the string subclass that shows that |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
How should datasette.client interact with base_url 722738988 | |
| 712962517 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1026#issuecomment-712962517 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1026 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcxMjk2MjUxNw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-10-20T16:09:12Z | 2020-10-20T16:09:12Z | OWNER | That Maybe |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
How should datasette.client interact with base_url 722738988 | |
| 712959034 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1026#issuecomment-712959034 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1026 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcxMjk1OTAzNA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-10-20T16:03:33Z | 2020-10-20T16:03:55Z | OWNER | Reconsidering this: I think the The clincher on this is when I went to add a section to the But there's a problem: to handle table name escaping users are likely to want to use
This risks adding the |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
How should datasette.client interact with base_url 722738988 | |
| 712607227 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1026#issuecomment-712607227 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1026 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcxMjYwNzIyNw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-10-20T05:46:44Z | 2020-10-20T05:46:44Z | OWNER | We have a solution for this now: |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
How should datasette.client interact with base_url 722738988 | |
| 709636372 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1026#issuecomment-709636372 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1026 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwOTYzNjM3Mg== | simonw 9599 | 2020-10-15T23:09:34Z | 2020-10-15T23:09:34Z | OWNER | I'm inclined to say that internal requests should ignore The one catch here is plugins that might want to proxy the current incoming URL for some reason - where that incoming Actually those should be fine - because it will have been stripped off earlier: |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
How should datasette.client interact with base_url 722738988 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1