issue_comments

Table actions

6 rows where issue = 743371103 sorted by updated_at descending

✖
✖

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 2

author_association 2

issue 1

  • Support linking to compound foreign keys · 6 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
1402900354 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1099#issuecomment-1402900354 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1099 IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Tno-C fgregg 536941 2023-01-25T00:58:26Z 2023-01-25T00:58:26Z CONTRIBUTOR

My original idea for compound foreign keys was to turn both of those columns into links, but that doesn't fit here because database_name is already part of a different foreign key.

it's pretty hard to know what the right thing to do is if a field is part of multiple foreign keys.

but, if that's not the case, what about making each of the columns a link. seems like an improvement over the status quo.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Support linking to compound foreign keys 743371103  
1402898291 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1099#issuecomment-1402898291 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1099 IC_kwDOBm6k_c5Tnodz fgregg 536941 2023-01-25T00:55:06Z 2023-01-25T00:55:06Z CONTRIBUTOR

I went ahead and spiked something together, in #2003 

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Support linking to compound foreign keys 743371103  
1402563930 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1099#issuecomment-1402563930 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1099 IC_kwDOBm6k_c5TmW1a fgregg 536941 2023-01-24T20:11:11Z 2023-01-24T20:11:11Z CONTRIBUTOR

hi @simonw, this bug bit me today.

the UX for linking from a table to the foreign key seems tough!

the design in the other direction seems a lot easier, for a given primary key detail page, add links back to the tables that refer to the row.

would you be open to a PR that solved the second problem but not the first?

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Support linking to compound foreign keys 743371103  
749845797 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1099#issuecomment-749845797 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1099 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0OTg0NTc5Nw== simonw 9599 2020-12-23T00:13:29Z 2020-12-23T00:14:25Z OWNER

Also need to solve displaying these links in the opposite direction:

https://latest.datasette.io/_internal/tables/fixtures,facet_cities

That page should link to lists of records in columns, foreign_keys and indexes - like this example: https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/roadside_attractions/1

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Support linking to compound foreign keys 743371103  
749771231 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1099#issuecomment-749771231 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1099 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0OTc3MTIzMQ== simonw 9599 2020-12-22T20:54:25Z 2020-12-22T20:54:25Z OWNER

https://latest.datasette.io/_internal/foreign_keys (use https://latest.datasette.io/login-as-root first) is now a compound foreign key table: sql CREATE TABLE foreign_keys ( "database_name" TEXT, "table_name" TEXT, "id" INTEGER, "seq" INTEGER, "table" TEXT, "from" TEXT, "to" TEXT, "on_update" TEXT, "on_delete" TEXT, "match" TEXT, PRIMARY KEY (database_name, table_name, id, seq), FOREIGN KEY (database_name) REFERENCES databases(database_name), FOREIGN KEY (database_name, table_name) REFERENCES tables(database_name, table_name) ); Currently the database_name column becomes a link (because it's a single foreign key) but the table_name one remains a non-link:

My original idea for compound foreign keys was to turn both of those columns into links, but that doesn't fit here because database_name is already part of a different foreign key.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Support linking to compound foreign keys 743371103  
735444858 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1099#issuecomment-735444858 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1099 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczNTQ0NDg1OA== simonw 9599 2020-11-29T19:51:58Z 2020-11-29T19:51:58Z OWNER

My fix in deb0be4ae56f191f121239b29e83dd53b62d6305 for #1098 was to have Datasette deliberately pretend that compound foreign keys don't exist: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/deb0be4ae56f191f121239b29e83dd53b62d6305/datasette/utils/init.py#L470-L495

This workaround will need to be rethought to implement real support for them.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
 Support linking to compound foreign keys 743371103  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
                ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
                ON [issue_comments] ([user]);