issue_comments
6 rows where issue = 764059235 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- More flexible CORS support in core, to encourage good security practices · 6 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1038289584 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1143#issuecomment-1038289584 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1143 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c494wqw | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-13T17:40:50Z | 2022-02-13T17:41:17Z | OWNER | The way Drupal does this is interesting; https://www.drupal.org/node/2715637 - it supports the following YAML:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
More flexible CORS support in core, to encourage good security practices 764059235 | |
746827083 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1143#issuecomment-746827083 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1143 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0NjgyNzA4Mw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-16T18:56:07Z | 2020-12-16T18:56:07Z | OWNER | I think the right way to do this is to support multiple optional |
{ "total_count": 2, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 1, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
More flexible CORS support in core, to encourage good security practices 764059235 | |
744618787 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1143#issuecomment-744618787 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1143 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0NDYxODc4Nw== | yurivish 114388 | 2020-12-14T18:15:00Z | 2020-12-15T02:21:53Z | NONE | From a quick look at the README, it does seem to do everything I need, thanks! I think the argument for inclusion in core is to lower the chances of unwanted data access. A local server can be accessed by anybody who can make an HTTP request to your computer regardless of CORS rules, but the default That's probably not what people typically intend, particularly when the data is of a sensitive nature. A default of requiring the user to specify the origin (allowing |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
More flexible CORS support in core, to encourage good security practices 764059235 | |
744757558 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1143#issuecomment-744757558 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1143 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0NDc1NzU1OA== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-14T22:42:10Z | 2020-12-14T22:42:10Z | OWNER | This may involve a breaking change to the CLI settings interface, so I'm adding this to the 1.0 milestone. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 1, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
More flexible CORS support in core, to encourage good security practices 764059235 | |
744756861 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1143#issuecomment-744756861 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1143 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0NDc1Njg2MQ== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-14T22:40:28Z | 2020-12-14T22:40:28Z | OWNER | That's a very convincing argument. I'm keen on making sure Datasette is "secure by default" so you're right, encouraging finely grains CORS rules in core rather than leaving that to a plugin sounds like the right call. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
More flexible CORS support in core, to encourage good security practices 764059235 | |
744249157 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1143#issuecomment-744249157 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1143 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0NDI0OTE1Nw== | simonw 9599 | 2020-12-14T07:53:15Z | 2020-12-14T07:53:15Z | OWNER | Does this plugin do everything you need? https://github.com/simonw/datasette-cors I'm open to arguments as to why this should be in core rather than in a plugin - I'm on the fence about that at the moment. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
More flexible CORS support in core, to encourage good security practices 764059235 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2