issue_comments
48 rows where issue = 973139047 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 · 48 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1068461449 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1068461449 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4_r22J | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-15T20:51:26Z | 2022-03-15T20:51:26Z | OWNER | I'm happy with this now that I've landed Tilde encoding in #1657. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1065988403 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1065988403 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4_ibEz | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-13T00:06:38Z | 2022-03-13T00:07:19Z | OWNER | If I want to reserve
So I'd add both |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1065987808 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1065987808 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4_ia7g | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-13T00:02:32Z | 2022-03-13T00:02:32Z | OWNER | OK, this has broken a lot more than I expected it would. Turns out https://datasette.io/-/databases for example has two:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1060870237 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1060870237 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4_O5hd | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-07T16:19:22Z | 2022-03-07T16:19:22Z | OWNER | I didn't need to do any of the fancy regular expression routing stuff after all, since the new dash encoding format avoids using |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1060044007 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1060044007 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4_Lvzn | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-06T21:38:15Z | 2022-03-06T21:38:15Z | OWNER | One big advantage to this scheme is that redirecting old links to |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1059903309 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1059903309 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4_LNdN | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-06T06:17:51Z | 2022-03-06T06:17:51Z | OWNER | Suggestion from a conversation with Seth Michael Larson: it would be neat if plugins could easily integrate with whatever scheme this ends up using, maybe with the Making it easy for plugins to do the right, consistent thing is a good idea. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1059864154 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1059864154 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4_LD5a | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-06T00:59:04Z | 2022-03-06T00:59:04Z | OWNER | Needs more testing, but this seems to work for decoding the percent-escaped-with-dashes format: |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1059863997 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1059863997 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4_LD29 | karlcow 505230 | 2022-03-06T00:57:57Z | 2022-03-06T00:57:57Z | NONE | Probably too late… but I have just seen this because And it reminded me of comma tools at W3C. Example, the text version of W3C homepage
I haven't checked all the cases in the thread. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1059855418 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1059855418 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4_LBw6 | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-06T00:00:53Z | 2022-03-06T00:04:18Z | OWNER |
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1059854864 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1059854864 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4_LBoQ | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-05T23:59:05Z | 2022-03-05T23:59:05Z | OWNER | OK, for that percentage thing: the Python core implementation of URL percentage escaping deliberately ignores two of the characters we want to escape:
It also defaults to skipping I'm going to try borrowing and modifying the core of the Python implementation: https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/6927632492cbad86a250aa006c1847e03b03e70b/Lib/urllib/parse.py#L795-L814
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1059853526 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1059853526 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4_LBTW | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-05T23:49:59Z | 2022-03-05T23:49:59Z | OWNER | I want to try regular percentage encoding, except that it also encodes both the Should check what it does with emoji too. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1059851259 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1059851259 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4_LAv7 | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-05T23:35:47Z | 2022-03-05T23:35:59Z | OWNER | This comment from glyph got me thinking:
What happens if a table name includes a I should consider |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1059850369 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1059850369 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4_LAiB | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-05T23:28:56Z | 2022-03-05T23:28:56Z | OWNER | Lots of great conversations about the dash encoding implementation on Twitter: https://twitter.com/simonw/status/1500228316309061633 @dracos helped me figure out a simpler regex: https://twitter.com/dracos/status/1500236433809973248
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1059836599 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1059836599 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4_K9K3 | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-05T21:52:10Z | 2022-03-05T21:52:10Z | OWNER | Blogged about this here: https://simonwillison.net/2022/Mar/5/dash-encoding/ |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1045069481 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1045069481 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4-Sn6p | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-18T19:34:41Z | 2022-03-05T21:32:22Z | OWNER | I think I got format extraction working! https://regex101.com/r/A0bW1D/1
I had to make that crazy inner one even more complicated to stop it from capturing
Visualized:
So now I have a regex which can extract out the dot-encoded table name AND spot if there is an optional
If I end up using this in Datasette it's going to need VERY comprehensive unit tests and inline documentation. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1059822391 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1059822391 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4_K5s3 | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-05T19:50:12Z | 2022-03-05T19:50:12Z | OWNER | I'm going to move this work to a PR. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1059822151 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1059822151 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4_K5pH | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-05T19:48:35Z | 2022-03-05T19:48:35Z | OWNER | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | ||
1059802318 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1059802318 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4_K0zO | simonw 9599 | 2022-03-05T17:34:33Z | 2022-03-05T17:34:33Z | OWNER | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | ||
1053973425 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1053973425 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4-0lux | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-28T07:40:12Z | 2022-02-28T07:40:12Z | OWNER | If I make this change it will break existing links to one of the oldest Datasette demos: http://fivethirtyeight.datasettes.com/fivethirtyeight/avengers%2Favengers A plugin that fixes those by redirecting them on 404 would be neat. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1049126151 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1049126151 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4-iGUH | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-23T19:17:01Z | 2022-02-23T19:17:01Z | OWNER | Actually the relevant code looks to be: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/7d24fd405f3c60e4c852c5d746c91aa2ba23cf5b/datasette/views/base.py#L481-L498 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1049124390 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1049124390 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4-iF4m | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-23T19:15:00Z | 2022-02-23T19:15:00Z | OWNER | I'll start by modifying this function: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/458f03ad3a454d271f47a643f4530bd8b60ddb76/datasette/utils/__init__.py#L732-L749 Later I want to move this to the routing layer to split out |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1049114724 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1049114724 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4-iDhk | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-23T19:04:40Z | 2022-02-23T19:04:40Z | OWNER | I'm going to try dash encoding for table names (and row IDs) in a branch and see how I like it. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1045269544 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1045269544 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4-TYwo | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-18T22:19:29Z | 2022-02-18T22:19:29Z | OWNER | Note that I've ruled out using |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1045134050 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1045134050 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4-S3ri | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-18T20:25:04Z | 2022-02-18T20:25:04Z | OWNER | Here's a useful modern spec for how existing URL percentage encoding is supposed to work: https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#percent-encoded-bytes |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1045131086 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1045131086 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4-S29O | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-18T20:22:13Z | 2022-02-18T20:22:47Z | OWNER | Should it encode Is it worth expanding dash-encoding outside of just |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1045117304 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1045117304 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4-Szl4 | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-18T20:09:22Z | 2022-02-18T20:09:22Z | OWNER | Adopting this could result in supporting database files with surprising characters in their filename too. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1045108611 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1045108611 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4-SxeD | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-18T20:02:19Z | 2022-02-18T20:08:34Z | OWNER | One other potential variant:
Except this has bugs - it doesn't round-trip safely, because it can get confused about things like
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1045111309 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1045111309 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4-SyIN | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-18T20:04:24Z | 2022-02-18T20:05:40Z | OWNER | This made me worry that my current
The regex still works against that double-encoded example too:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1045099290 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1045099290 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4-SvMa | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-18T19:56:18Z | 2022-02-18T19:56:30Z | OWNER |
I think dash-encoding (new name for this) is the right way forward here. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1045024276 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1045024276 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4-Sc4U | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-18T19:01:42Z | 2022-02-18T19:55:24Z | OWNER |
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1045095348 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1045095348 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4-SuO0 | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-18T19:53:48Z | 2022-02-18T19:53:48Z | OWNER |
I don't think this matters. The new regex does indeed capture that kind of page:
But Datasette goes through configured route regular expressions in order - so I can have the regex that captures |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1045081042 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1045081042 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4-SqvS | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-18T19:44:12Z | 2022-02-18T19:51:34Z | OWNER |
No need for hyphen encoding in this variant at all, which simplifies things a bit. (Update: this is flawed, see https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1045086033) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1045086033 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1045086033 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4-Sr9R | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-18T19:47:43Z | 2022-02-18T19:51:11Z | OWNER |
Do both of those survive the round-trip to populate No! In both cases the It looks like this might even be a client issue -
So |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1045082891 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1045082891 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4-SrML | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-18T19:45:32Z | 2022-02-18T19:45:32Z | OWNER |
I worry that web servers might treat |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1045077590 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1045077590 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4-Sp5W | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-18T19:41:37Z | 2022-02-18T19:42:41Z | OWNER | Ugh, one disadvantage I just spotted with this: Datasette already has a And I've thought about adding Maybe change this system to use |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1045075207 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1045075207 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4-SpUH | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-18T19:39:35Z | 2022-02-18T19:40:13Z | OWNER |
Here's what those look like with the updated version of
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1045059427 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1045059427 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4-Sldj | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-18T19:26:25Z | 2022-02-18T19:26:25Z | OWNER | With this new pattern I could probably extract out the optional |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1045055772 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1045055772 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4-Skkc | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-18T19:23:33Z | 2022-02-18T19:25:42Z | OWNER | I want a match for this URL:
Maybe this:
Here we are matching a sequence of:
So a combination of not-slashes OR -/ or -. Or -- sequences
Try that with non-capturing bits:
Here's the explanation on regex101.com https://regex101.com/r/CPnsIO/1
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1045032377 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1045032377 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4-Se25 | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-18T19:06:50Z | 2022-02-18T19:06:50Z | OWNER | How does URL routing for https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/table%2Fwith%2Fslashes.csv work? Right now it's https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/7d24fd405f3c60e4c852c5d746c91aa2ba23cf5b/datasette/app.py#L1098-L1101 That's not going to capture the dot-dash encoding version of that table name:
Probably needs a fancy regex trick like a negative lookbehind assertion or similar. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1045027067 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1045027067 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c4-Sdj7 | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-18T19:03:26Z | 2022-02-18T19:03:26Z | OWNER | (If I make this change it may break some existing Datasette installations when they upgrade - I could try and build a plugin for them which triggers on 404s and checks to see if the old format would return a 200 response, then returns that.) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
1031141849 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1031141849 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c49dfnZ | simonw 9599 | 2022-02-07T07:11:11Z | 2022-02-07T07:11:11Z | OWNER | I added a Link header to solve this problem for the JSON version in: |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
900715375 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-900715375 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c41r9Nv | simonw 9599 | 2021-08-18T00:15:28Z | 2021-08-18T00:15:28Z | OWNER | Maybe I should use |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
900714630 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-900714630 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c41r9CG | simonw 9599 | 2021-08-18T00:13:33Z | 2021-08-18T00:13:33Z | OWNER | The documentation should definitely cover how table names become URLs, in case any third party code needs to be able to calculate this themselves. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
900712981 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-900712981 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c41r8oV | simonw 9599 | 2021-08-18T00:09:59Z | 2021-08-18T00:12:32Z | OWNER | So given the original examples, a table called
And if for some horific reason you had a table with the name
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
900711967 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-900711967 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c41r8Yf | simonw 9599 | 2021-08-18T00:08:09Z | 2021-08-18T00:08:09Z | OWNER | Here's an alternative I just made up which I'm calling "dot dash" encoding:
And some examples:
Outputs:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
900709703 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-900709703 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c41r71H | simonw 9599 | 2021-08-18T00:03:09Z | 2021-08-18T00:03:09Z | OWNER | But... what if I invent my own escaping scheme? I actually did this once before, in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/commit/9fdb47ca952b93b7b60adddb965ea6642b1ff523 - while I was working on porting Datasette to ASGI in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/272#issuecomment-494192779 because ASGI didn't yet have the I could bring that back - it looked like this:
But I didn't particularly like it - it was quite verbose. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
900705226 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-900705226 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c41r6vK | simonw 9599 | 2021-08-17T23:50:32Z | 2021-08-17T23:50:47Z | OWNER | An alternative solution would be to use some form of escaping for the characters that form the name of the table. The obvious way to do this would be URL-encoding - but it doesn't hold for
Surprisingly in this case Vercel DOES keep it intact, but Cloud Run does not. It's still no good though: I need a solution that works on Vercel, Cloud Run and every other potential hosting provider too. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 | |
900699670 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-900699670 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c41r5YW | simonw 9599 | 2021-08-17T23:34:23Z | 2021-08-17T23:34:23Z | OWNER | The challenge comes down to telling the difference between the following:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Rethink how .ext formats (v.s. ?_format=) works before 1.0 973139047 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2