issue_comments
36 rows where "updated_at" is on date 2022-01-20 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
user 3
- simonw 34
- eyeseast 1
- astrojuanlu 1
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1018017637 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1608#issuecomment-1018017637 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1608 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48rbdl | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T23:27:59Z | 2022-01-20T23:27:59Z | OWNER | Got a couple of TILs out of this: |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Documentation should clarify /stable/ vs /latest/ 1109808154 | |
1017998993 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1608#issuecomment-1017998993 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1608 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48rW6R | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T22:56:00Z | 2022-01-20T22:56:00Z | OWNER |
Correction! That tool DOES support that, as can be seen in their example configuration for their own documentation:
|
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Documentation should clarify /stable/ vs /latest/ 1109808154 | |
1017994925 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1608#issuecomment-1017994925 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1608 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48rV6t | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T22:48:43Z | 2022-01-20T22:54:02Z | OWNER | https://sphinx-version-warning.readthedocs.io/ looks like it can show a banner for "You are looking at v0.36 but you should be looking at 0.40" but doesn't hand the case I need here which is "you are looking at /latest/ but you should be looking at /stable/". Just shipped my fix here: https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/ |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Documentation should clarify /stable/ vs /latest/ 1109808154 | |
1017993482 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1608#issuecomment-1017993482 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1608 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48rVkK | astrojuanlu 316517 | 2022-01-20T22:46:16Z | 2022-01-20T22:46:16Z | NONE | Or you can use https://sphinx-version-warning.readthedocs.io/! 😄 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Documentation should clarify /stable/ vs /latest/ 1109808154 | |
1017988556 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1608#issuecomment-1017988556 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1608 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48rUXM | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T22:37:51Z | 2022-01-20T22:37:51Z | OWNER | Here's a jQuery recipe that seems to do the right thing:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Documentation should clarify /stable/ vs /latest/ 1109808154 | |
1017975322 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1608#issuecomment-1017975322 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1608 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48rRIa | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T22:17:01Z | 2022-01-20T22:27:07Z | OWNER | Turns out that banner is something that ReadTheDocs implemented - I found it using GitHub code search, it's produced by this piece of JavaScript: https://github.com/readthedocs/readthedocs.org/blob/0852d7c10d725d954d3e9a93513171baa1116d9f/readthedocs/core/static-src/core/js/doc-embed/version-compare.js#L13-L21 ```javascript function init(data) { var rtd = rtddata.get();
} ``` And here's where that module is called from the rest of their code: https://github.com/readthedocs/readthedocs.org/blob/bc3e147770e5740314a8e8c33fec5d111c850498/readthedocs/core/static-src/core/js/doc-embed/footer.js#L66-L86 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Documentation should clarify /stable/ vs /latest/ 1109808154 | |
1017981599 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1608#issuecomment-1017981599 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1608 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48rSqf | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T22:26:32Z | 2022-01-20T22:26:32Z | OWNER | I'm tempted to imitate their JavaScript but check for |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Documentation should clarify /stable/ vs /latest/ 1109808154 | |
1017971905 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1608#issuecomment-1017971905 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1608 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48rQTB | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T22:11:40Z | 2022-01-20T22:11:40Z | OWNER | Huh, I had forgotten I already have a banner on older versions: |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Documentation should clarify /stable/ vs /latest/ 1109808154 | |
1017970132 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1608#issuecomment-1017970132 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1608 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48rP3U | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T22:08:55Z | 2022-01-20T22:08:55Z | OWNER | Might want to consider SEO here too - I want people from search engines to land on |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Documentation should clarify /stable/ vs /latest/ 1109808154 | |
1017969452 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1608#issuecomment-1017969452 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1608 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48rPss | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T22:07:55Z | 2022-01-20T22:07:55Z | OWNER | I think I want a banner at the top of the page making it obvious which version the documentation is talking about. This can be pretty low key for the current stable release, but should be visually more prominent for the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Documentation should clarify /stable/ vs /latest/ 1109808154 | |
1017842366 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1603#issuecomment-1017842366 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1603 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48qwq- | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T19:19:54Z | 2022-01-20T19:19:54Z | OWNER | Wrote up a TIL: https://til.simonwillison.net/pixelmator/pixel-editing-favicon |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
A proper favicon 1108235694 | |
1017808898 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1603#issuecomment-1017808898 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1603 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48qogC | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T18:42:35Z | 2022-01-20T18:42:35Z | OWNER | Resized it down to 208 bytes with https://squoosh.app |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
A proper favicon 1108235694 | |
1017806497 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1603#issuecomment-1017806497 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1603 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48qn6h | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T18:39:27Z | 2022-01-20T18:39:57Z | OWNER | Here's a comparison between my hand-edited version and the one I have now: The new 32x32 image: |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
A proper favicon 1108235694 | |
1017800506 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1603#issuecomment-1017800506 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1603 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48qmc6 | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T18:31:18Z | 2022-01-20T18:31:18Z | OWNER | One last go at tidying this up. I decided to do a 32x32 pixel version in Pixelmator, using this trick to access a pixel brush: https://osxdaily.com/2016/11/17/enable-pixel-brush-pixelmator-mac/ Frustrating how the white boxes are all exactly four pixels high and ALMOST all four pixels wide, but one of them has to be three pixels wide to fit the space. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
A proper favicon 1108235694 | |
1017149828 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1603#issuecomment-1017149828 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1603 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48oHmE | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T06:07:31Z | 2022-01-20T06:07:31Z | OWNER | Now live on https://latest.datastte.io/ - I'm happy enough with this for the moment: |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
A proper favicon 1108235694 | |
1017143817 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1603#issuecomment-1017143817 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1603 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48oGIJ | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T05:54:09Z | 2022-01-20T05:54:09Z | OWNER | Oops, I pushed the one I liked least out of the two options! Fixing now. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
A proper favicon 1108235694 | |
1017143437 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1603#issuecomment-1017143437 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1603 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48oGCN | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T05:53:17Z | 2022-01-20T05:53:17Z | OWNER | New favicon now live on https://latest.datasette.io/ - see also https://latest.datasette.io/favicon.ico |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
A proper favicon 1108235694 | |
1017142395 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1603#issuecomment-1017142395 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1603 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48oFx7 | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T05:50:55Z | 2022-01-20T05:50:55Z | OWNER | The new |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
A proper favicon 1108235694 | |
1017139321 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1603#issuecomment-1017139321 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1603 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48oFB5 | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T05:43:07Z | 2022-01-20T05:46:42Z | OWNER | My attempt with one less grid line looked awful when shrunk down to the browser size: File here: I'm going with the first attempt for the moment. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
A proper favicon 1108235694 | |
1017137117 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1603#issuecomment-1017137117 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1603 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48oEfd | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T05:37:05Z | 2022-01-20T05:37:34Z | OWNER | I'm not crazy about the look - I think this version of the grid may have too many lines for this particular display size. I'm going to try reducing the number of lines in Figma to see if I like that better. https://www.figma.com/file/LKjceTFNtKm6wCbScDqm1Y/Datasette-Logo |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
A proper favicon 1108235694 | |
1017136897 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1603#issuecomment-1017136897 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1603 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48oEcB | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T05:36:29Z | 2022-01-20T05:36:29Z | OWNER | Here's what it looks like in Firefox, Chrome and Safari: |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
A proper favicon 1108235694 | |
1017133357 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1603#issuecomment-1017133357 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1603 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48oDkt | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T05:27:34Z | 2022-01-20T05:27:34Z | OWNER | I'm going to drop it in |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
A proper favicon 1108235694 | |
1017132927 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1603#issuecomment-1017132927 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1603 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48oDd_ | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T05:26:29Z | 2022-01-20T05:26:29Z | OWNER | Here's the 128x128 one - 11kb, I resized it using Preview: Now running it through Squoosh using OxiPNG effort=3 colours=24 - brought it down to 1.36KB. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
A proper favicon 1108235694 | |
1017131801 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1603#issuecomment-1017131801 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1603 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48oDMZ | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T05:23:57Z | 2022-01-20T05:23:57Z | OWNER | https://adamj.eu/tech/2022/01/18/how-to-add-a-favicon-to-your-django-site/ suggests 64x64, I'm going with 128x128 just in case anyone invents a retina-retina screen. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
A proper favicon 1108235694 | |
1017131209 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1603#issuecomment-1017131209 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1603 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48oDDJ | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T05:22:40Z | 2022-01-20T05:22:40Z | OWNER | This one is 101KB and 1536*1536 which is a bit big! https://github.com/simonw/datasette-app/blob/main/build/icon.png |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
A proper favicon 1108235694 | |
1017124310 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1600#issuecomment-1017124310 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1600 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48oBXW | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T05:06:09Z | 2022-01-20T05:06:09Z | OWNER | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
plugins --all example should use cog 1104691662 | ||
1017113831 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1601#issuecomment-1017113831 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1601 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48n-zn | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T04:38:14Z | 2022-01-20T04:38:14Z | OWNER | I don't have solid tests in place for exercising SpatiaLite, but this change feels safe enough that I'm not going to add tests for it. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add KNN and data_licenses to hidden tables list 1105916061 | |
1017112130 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1577#issuecomment-1017112130 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1577 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48n-ZC | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T04:33:57Z | 2022-01-20T04:33:57Z | OWNER | Dropped support for Python 3.6: updated |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Drop support for Python 3.6 1087913724 | |
1017109401 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1577#issuecomment-1017109401 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1577 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48n9uZ | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T04:27:34Z | 2022-01-20T04:27:34Z | OWNER | OK, now that Uvicorn has dropped 3.6 support - see #1606 - I think this decision is easy to make. I'm dropping 3.6. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Drop support for Python 3.6 1087913724 | |
1017109194 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1606#issuecomment-1017109194 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1606 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48n9rK | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T04:27:07Z | 2022-01-20T04:27:07Z | OWNER | Relevant: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1577 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Tests failing against Python 3.6 1108846067 | |
1017108960 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1606#issuecomment-1017108960 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1606 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48n9ng | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T04:26:36Z | 2022-01-20T04:26:36Z | OWNER | https://pypistats.org/packages/datasette shows Python 3.6 is 0.24% of Datasette downloads. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Tests failing against Python 3.6 1108846067 | |
1017108291 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1606#issuecomment-1017108291 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1606 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48n9dD | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T04:24:54Z | 2022-01-20T04:24:54Z | OWNER | https://github.com/simonw/latest-datasette-with-all-plugins/commit/1e12ffe70be791e3281b41810e837515314c1317 shows that 5 days ago Datasette upgraded from Uvicorn 0.16 to 0.17 Sure enough, in the changelog for 0.17: https://github.com/encode/uvicorn/blob/0.17.0/CHANGELOG.md
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Tests failing against Python 3.6 1108846067 | |
1016639294 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1601#issuecomment-1016639294 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1601 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48mK8- | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-19T16:26:44Z | 2022-01-20T03:57:17Z | OWNER | I need to add |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add KNN and data_licenses to hidden tables list 1105916061 | |
1017095821 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1601#issuecomment-1017095821 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1601 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48n6aN | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T03:56:14Z | 2022-01-20T03:56:28Z | OWNER | Oh interesting, I hadn't heard about KNN2. It looks like it was added to SpatiaLite on 21st June 2021 in https://www.gaia-gis.it/fossil/libspatialite/info/03786a62cdb4ab17 but the most recent release of SpatiaLite is 5.0.1 from 7th February 2021 - so it's not yet in a release. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add KNN and data_licenses to hidden tables list 1105916061 | |
1017016553 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1356#issuecomment-1017016553 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1356 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48nnDp | simonw 9599 | 2022-01-20T01:06:37Z | 2022-01-20T01:06:37Z | OWNER |
I figured out a neat pattern for streaming JSON arrays in this TIL: https://til.simonwillison.net/python/output-json-array-streaming |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Research: syntactic sugar for using --get with SQL queries, maybe "datasette query" 910092577 | |
1016994329 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1605#issuecomment-1016994329 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1605 | IC_kwDOBm6k_c48nhoZ | eyeseast 25778 | 2022-01-20T00:27:17Z | 2022-01-20T00:27:17Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Right now, I usually have a line in a Makefile like this:
That all assumes I've loaded whatever I need into It works, but as you can see, it's a lot to manage, a lot of boilerplate, and it wasn't obvious how to get there. If there's an error in the canned query, I get an HTML error page, so that's hard to debug. And it's only one query, so each output needs a line like this. Make isn't ideal, either, for that reason. The thing I really liked with
And then do:
For HTML export, maybe there's a |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Scripted exports 1108671952 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 8