home / github

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

3 rows where "updated_at" is on date 2022-04-08 and user = 9599 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: issue_url, updated_at (date)

issue 2

  • Proposal: datasette query 2
  • Bump black from 22.1.0 to 22.3.0 1

user 1

  • simonw · 3 ✖

author_association 1

  • OWNER 3
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions issue performed_via_github_app
1093454899 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1693#issuecomment-1093454899 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1693 IC_kwDOBm6k_c5BLMwz simonw 9599 2022-04-08T23:07:04Z 2022-04-08T23:07:04Z OWNER

Tests failed here due to this issue: - https://github.com/psf/black/pull/2987

A future Black release should fix that.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
Bump black from 22.1.0 to 22.3.0 1184850337  
1092361727 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1699#issuecomment-1092361727 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1699 IC_kwDOBm6k_c5BHB3_ simonw 9599 2022-04-08T01:47:43Z 2022-04-08T01:47:43Z OWNER

A render mode for that plugin hook that writes to a stream is exactly what I have in mind: - #1062

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
Proposal: datasette query 1193090967  
1092321966 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1699#issuecomment-1092321966 https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1699 IC_kwDOBm6k_c5BG4Ku simonw 9599 2022-04-08T00:20:32Z 2022-04-08T00:20:56Z OWNER

If we do this I'm keen to have it be more than just an alternative to the existing sqlite-utils command - especially since if I add sqlite-utils as a dependency of Datasette in the future that command will be installed as part of pip install datasette anyway.

My best thought on how to differentiate them so far is plugins: if Datasette plugins that provide alternative outputs - like .geojson and .yml and suchlike - also work for the datasette query command that would make a lot of sense to me.

One way that could work: a --fmt geojson option to this command which uses the plugin that was registered for the specified extension.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
Proposal: datasette query 1193090967  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
                ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
                ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 864.97ms · About: github-to-sqlite