issue_comments
4 rows where user = 1111743 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
user 1
- jungle-boogie · 4 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
812742462 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/916#issuecomment-812742462 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/916 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgxMjc0MjQ2Mg== | jungle-boogie 1111743 | 2021-04-02T22:37:27Z | 2021-04-02T22:37:27Z | NONE | Yes, this would be nice! I using Datasette v0.56 and don't see a previous page button. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support reverse pagination (previous page, has-previous-items) 672421411 | |
812711365 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1245#issuecomment-812711365 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1245 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgxMjcxMTM2NQ== | jungle-boogie 1111743 | 2021-04-02T20:53:35Z | 2021-04-02T20:53:35Z | NONE | Yes, I agree. Alternatively, maybe the header could be at the top and bottom, above the next page button. Maybe even have the header 50 records down? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Sticky table column headers would be useful, especially on the query page 817544251 | |
812710120 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1255#issuecomment-812710120 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1255 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgxMjcxMDEyMA== | jungle-boogie 1111743 | 2021-04-02T20:50:08Z | 2021-04-02T20:50:08Z | NONE | Hello again, I was able to get my facets running with this
|
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Facets timing out but work when filtering 826700095 | |
812680519 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1255#issuecomment-812680519 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1255 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgxMjY4MDUxOQ== | jungle-boogie 1111743 | 2021-04-02T19:37:57Z | 2021-04-02T19:37:57Z | NONE | Hello, I'm also experiencing a timeout in my environment. I don't know if it's because I need more indexes or a more powerful system. My data has 1,271,111 and when I try to create a facet, there's a time out. I've tried this on two different rows that should significantly filter down data: Simon's johns_hopkins_csse_daily_reports has more rows and it setup with two facets on load. He does have four indexes created, though. Do I need more indexes? I have one simple one so far:
I'm running Datasette 0.56 installed via pip with Python 3.7.3.
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Facets timing out but work when filtering 826700095 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 3