issue_comments
8 rows where user = 12617395 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
user 1
- bsilverm · 8 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | issue | performed_via_github_app |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
548058715 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/605#issuecomment-548058715 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/605 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0ODA1ODcxNQ== | bsilverm 12617395 | 2019-10-30T18:44:41Z | 2019-10-30T18:55:37Z | NONE | Sure. I imagine it being pretty straight forward. Today when you click on the database, the UI displays: -Table 1- -fields- -row count- -Table 2- -fields- -row count- Queries: -query1- -query2- .. ... My proposal would be to display as follows: -Table 1- -fields- -row count- Queries: -query1- -query2- .. ... -Table 2- -fields- -row count- Queries: -query1- -query2- .. ... This way, if a given table is not present in the database, the associated queries are also not present. Today, I have a list of queries, some work, some result in errors depending on whether the dependent tables exist in the database. Let me know if that makes sense. Thanks again! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support queries at the table level 510076368 | |
544502617 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/588#issuecomment-544502617 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/588 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0NDUwMjYxNw== | bsilverm 12617395 | 2019-10-21T12:58:22Z | 2019-10-21T12:58:22Z | NONE | Thanks for the reply. I was hoping queries per table were supported, as I have an application that builds tables depending on the user input to the application. It will either create one table, or two.. and if one or the other is missing, certain queries will return errors. Of course I can work around this by labeling the query name and hope users don't click queries they have not created a table for, but ideally the user would see the queries available based on the tables that exist in their database. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Queries per DB table in metadata.json 505512251 | |
404576136 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/339#issuecomment-404576136 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/339 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwNDU3NjEzNg== | bsilverm 12617395 | 2018-07-12T16:45:08Z | 2018-07-12T16:45:08Z | NONE | Thanks for the quick reply. Looks like that is working well. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Expose SANIC_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT config option in a sensible way 340396247 | |
399173916 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/321#issuecomment-399173916 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/321 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5OTE3MzkxNg== | bsilverm 12617395 | 2018-06-21T17:00:10Z | 2018-06-21T17:00:10Z | NONE | Oh I see.. My issue is that the query executes with an empty string prior to the user submitting the parameters. I'll try adding your workaround to some of my queries. Thanks again, |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Wildcard support in query parameters 334190959 | |
399129220 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/321#issuecomment-399129220 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/321 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5OTEyOTIyMA== | bsilverm 12617395 | 2018-06-21T14:45:02Z | 2018-06-21T14:45:02Z | NONE | Those queries look identical. How can this be prevented if the queries are in a metadata.json file? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Wildcard support in query parameters 334190959 | |
399106871 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/321#issuecomment-399106871 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/321 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5OTEwNjg3MQ== | bsilverm 12617395 | 2018-06-21T13:39:37Z | 2018-06-21T13:39:37Z | NONE | One thing I've noticed with this approach is that the query is executed with no parameters which I do not believe was the case previously. In the case the table contains a lot of data, this adds some time executing the query before the user can enter their input and run it with the parameters they want. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Wildcard support in query parameters 334190959 | |
399098080 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/321#issuecomment-399098080 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/321 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5OTA5ODA4MA== | bsilverm 12617395 | 2018-06-21T13:10:48Z | 2018-06-21T13:10:48Z | NONE | Perfect, thank you!! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Wildcard support in query parameters 334190959 | |
398778485 | https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/188#issuecomment-398778485 | https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/188 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5ODc3ODQ4NQ== | bsilverm 12617395 | 2018-06-20T14:48:39Z | 2018-06-20T14:48:39Z | NONE | This would be a great feature to have! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ability to bundle metadata and templates inside the SQLite file 309047460 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) , [performed_via_github_app] TEXT); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 5