id,node_id,number,title,user,user_label,state,locked,assignee,assignee_label,milestone,milestone_label,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,repo_label,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason
472097220,MDU6SXNzdWU0NzIwOTcyMjA=,7,Script uses a lot of RAM,9599,simonw,closed,0,,,,,3,2019-07-24T06:11:11Z,2019-07-24T06:35:52Z,2019-07-24T06:35:52Z,MEMBER,,"I'm using an XML pull parser which should avoid the need to slurp the whole XML file into memory, but it's not working - the script still uses over 1GB of RAM when it runs according to Activity Monitor.

I think this is because I'm still causing the full root element to be incrementally loaded into memory just in case I try and access it later.

http://effbot.org/elementtree/iterparse.htm says I should use `elem.clear()` as I go. It also says:

> The above pattern has one drawback; it does not clear the root element, so you will end up with a single element with lots of empty child elements. If your files are huge, rather than just large, this might be a problem. To work around this, you need to get your hands on the root element.

So I will try that recipe and see if it helps.",197882382,healthkit-to-sqlite,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/healthkit-to-sqlite/issues/7/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
472104705,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MzAwNTgwMjIx,8,Use less RAM,9599,simonw,closed,0,,,,,0,2019-07-24T06:35:01Z,2019-07-24T06:35:52Z,2019-07-24T06:35:52Z,MEMBER,dogsheep/healthkit-to-sqlite/pulls/8,Closes #7,197882382,healthkit-to-sqlite,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/healthkit-to-sqlite/issues/8/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0,