id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason
445868234,MDU6SXNzdWU0NDU4NjgyMzQ=,478,Make it so Docker build doesn't delay PyPI release,9599,closed,0,,4471010,3,2019-05-19T21:52:10Z,2019-07-08T03:30:41Z,2019-07-07T20:03:20Z,OWNER,,"Datasette automated releases currently include building a Docker image that has a full custom-compiled version of SQLite and SpatiaLite. This takes ages!

I still want to publish this Docker image (to https://hub.docker.com/r/datasetteproject/datasette/tags ) but I'd like it if this wasn't a blocker on pushing the new package to PyPI. Ideally PyPI publish would happen first.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/478/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
465002978,MDU6SXNzdWU0NjUwMDI5Nzg=,550,Pull m2m faceting out of master so we can ship a release without it,9599,closed,0,,4471010,1,2019-07-07T23:10:48Z,2019-07-07T23:21:22Z,2019-07-07T23:21:22Z,OWNER,,After spending some time with #495 I believe I need to make some pretty major changes to how m2m faceting works. I don't want it to block the release of ASGI Datasette so I'm going to revert it back out of master for the moment and merge it back in after the release has gone out.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/550/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
446433735,MDU6SXNzdWU0NDY0MzM3MzU=,482,Example of a custom facet plugin is incorrect,9599,closed,0,,4471010,0,2019-05-21T06:12:47Z,2019-07-07T23:19:10Z,2019-07-07T23:19:10Z,OWNER,,"The function signatures are wrong on https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/0.28/plugins.html#register-facet-classes

The new signatures are: `async def suggest(self)` and `async def facet_results(self)` - the `sql` and `params` are now passed to the class constructor.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/482/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
453829910,MDU6SXNzdWU0NTM4Mjk5MTA=,505,Add white-space: pre-wrap to SQL create statement,9599,closed,0,9599,4471010,0,2019-06-08T19:59:56Z,2019-07-07T20:26:55Z,2019-07-07T20:26:55Z,OWNER,,"Right now a super-long CREATE TABLE statement causes the table page to be even wider than the table itself:

<img width=""1067"" alt=""many-photos-tables__RKMaster__1_row_where_where_modelId___18479_and_New_Issue_·_simonw_datasette_and_many-photos-tables__RKPlace__1_274_rows"" src=""https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/59151726-27d47400-89ed-11e9-9ff7-76c129127329.png"">

Adding `white-space: pre-wrap` to that `<pre>` element is an easy fix:

<img width=""1070"" alt=""many-photos-tables__RKMaster__28_260_rows_and_New_Issue_·_simonw_datasette"" src=""https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/59151732-476b9c80-89ed-11e9-8c1b-c9af98bad5b4.png"">
",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/505/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
464905894,MDU6SXNzdWU0NjQ5MDU4OTQ=,545,Fix header on 404 page,9599,closed,0,,4471010,1,2019-07-07T01:47:40Z,2019-07-07T20:26:55Z,2019-07-07T20:26:55Z,OWNER,,"<img width=""707"" alt=""Error_404"" src=""https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/60762932-83127a00-a01e-11e9-853a-6ea6aa5e8f6d.png"">
",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/545/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
445875242,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjgwMjA1NTAy,480,Split pypi and docker travis tasks,813732,closed,0,,4471010,1,2019-05-19T23:14:37Z,2019-07-07T20:03:20Z,2019-07-07T20:03:20Z,CONTRIBUTOR,simonw/datasette/pulls/480,"Resolves #478 

This *should* work, but because this is a change that'll only really be testable on a) this repo, b) master branch, this might fail fast if I didn't get the configurations right. 


Looking at #478 it should just be as simple as splitting out the docker and pypi processes into separate jobs, but it might end up being more complicated than that, depending on what pre-processes the pypi deployment needs, and how travisci treats deployment steps without scripts in general. ",107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/480/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0,