id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason
577302229,MDU6SXNzdWU1NzczMDIyMjk=,91,Enable ordering FTS results by rank,416374,closed,0,,6079500,1,2020-03-07T08:43:51Z,2020-11-06T23:53:26Z,2020-11-06T23:53:25Z,NONE,,According to https://www.sqlite.org/fts5.html (not sure about FTS4) results can be sorted by relevance. At the moment results are returned by default by `rowid`. Perhaps a flag can be added to the `search` method?,140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/91/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
735663855,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTE1MDE0ODgz,195,table.search() improvements plus sqlite-utils search command,9599,closed,0,,,3,2020-11-03T22:02:08Z,2020-11-06T18:30:49Z,2020-11-06T18:30:42Z,OWNER,simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/195,Refs #192. Still needs tests.,140912432,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/195/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0,
737476423,MDU6SXNzdWU3Mzc0NzY0MjM=,198,Support order by relevance against FTS4,9599,closed,0,,,6,2020-11-06T05:36:31Z,2020-11-06T18:30:44Z,2020-11-06T18:30:44Z,OWNER,,"For #192 and #197 I've decided I want to be able to order by relevance in FTS4 as well as FTS5.

This means I need to port over my work on bm25() from https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-fts4 (since I don't want to add a full dependency).",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/198/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
737855731,MDU6SXNzdWU3Mzc4NTU3MzE=,199,"@db.register_function(..., replace=False) to avoid double-registering custom functions",9599,closed,0,,,1,2020-11-06T15:39:21Z,2020-11-06T18:30:44Z,2020-11-06T18:30:44Z,OWNER,,"I'd like a mechanism to optionally avoid registering a custom function if it has already been registered.

SQLite doesn't seem to offer a way to introspect registered custom functions so I'll need to track what has already been registered in `sqlite-utils` instead.

> Should I register the custom `rank_bm25` SQLite function for every connection, or should I register it against the connection just the first time the user attempts an FTS4 search? I think I'd rather register it only if it is needed.

_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/198#issuecomment-723145383_",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/199/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed