id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason
1524431805,I_kwDODEm0Qs5a3Pu9,72,"Import thread, including self- and others' replies",601708,open,0,,,0,2023-01-08T09:51:06Z,2023-01-08T09:51:06Z,,NONE,,"statuses-lookup, home-timeline, mentions (only for auth'ed user) don't cover this.

`twitter-to-sqlite fetch-thread tw-group1.db 1234123412341234`

twitter-to-sqlite focuses on archiving users, but does not easily support archiving conversations or community activity.

For reference, this is [implemented in twarc](https://sourcegraph.com/github.com/DocNow/twarc/-/blob/twarc/client.py?L708-766&subtree=true), using a search, optionally recursively.

Other research suggests that this formerly, or currently, requires a [search query](https://stackoverflow.com/a/30480103/1020467), use of [undocumented `related_results` api](https://stackoverflow.com/a/9419346/1020467), or with requested inclusion of [newer conversation_id](https://stackoverflow.com/a/68115718/1020467) with subsequent query.

",206156866,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/twitter-to-sqlite/issues/72/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
923602693,MDU6SXNzdWU5MjM2MDI2OTM=,276,support small help flag -h,601708,closed,0,,,0,2021-06-17T07:59:31Z,2021-06-18T14:56:59Z,2021-06-18T14:56:59Z,CONTRIBUTOR,,,140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/276/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed