id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason 1082564912,I_kwDOBm6k_c5AhqEw,1557,`?_nosuggest=1` parameter for disabling facet suggestions on table view,9599,closed,0,,7571612,1,2021-12-16T19:21:42Z,2022-01-13T22:26:48Z,2021-12-16T19:24:59Z,OWNER,,"Found I wanted this while I was debugging #625 just to clean up the debug traces, but it makes sense as a partner to `?_nofacet=1` and `?_nocount=1` from #1350 and #1353.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1557/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1081318247,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Ac5tn,1556,"Show count of facet values always, not just for `?_facet_size=max`",9599,closed,0,,7571612,1,2021-12-15T17:49:01Z,2022-01-13T22:26:07Z,2021-12-15T17:58:06Z,OWNER,,"> You've caused me to rethink this feature - I no longer think there's value in only showing these numbers if `?_facet_size=max` as opposed to all of the time. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1423#issuecomment-995023410_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1556/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 1, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 733999615,MDU6SXNzdWU3MzM5OTk2MTU=,1079,Handle long breadcrumbs better with new menu,9599,open,0,,,1,2020-11-01T15:57:41Z,2022-01-13T22:21:29Z,,OWNER,,"On this page when signed in as root: https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/roadside_attraction_characteristics/1 ![EF921CB1-625F-4D04-A850-490B812A72B3](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/97807807-db0fbf80-1c17-11eb-9c77-ae5169b12c3d.jpeg) ![A49D8B76-5ACF-4F71-A8B4-21A44F5C8D51](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/97807809-dea34680-1c17-11eb-9511-a49af56a4bd2.jpeg) ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1079/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 707849175,MDU6SXNzdWU3MDc4NDkxNzU=,974,static assets and favicon aren't cached by the browser,45416,open,0,,,1,2020-09-24T04:44:55Z,2022-01-13T22:21:28Z,,NONE,,"Using datasette to solve some frustrating problems with our fulfillment provider today, I was surprised to see repeated requests for assets under /-/static and the favicon. While it won't likely be a huge performance bottleneck, I bet datasette would feel a bit zippier if you had Uvicorn serving up some caching-related headers telling the browser it was safe to cache static assets.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/974/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 895686039,MDU6SXNzdWU4OTU2ODYwMzk=,1336,Document turning on WAL for live served SQLite databases,9599,open,0,,,1,2021-05-19T17:08:58Z,2022-01-13T21:55:59Z,,OWNER,,"Datasette docs don't talk about WAL yet, which allows you to safely serve reads from a database file while it is accepting writes.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1336/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,