id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason 991467558,MDU6SXNzdWU5OTE0Njc1NTg=,1466,Add Datasette Desktop to installation documentation,9599,closed,0,,7571612,2,2021-09-08T19:41:27Z,2022-01-13T22:28:28Z,2022-01-13T21:55:18Z,OWNER,,See https://datasette.io/desktop and https://simonwillison.net/2021/Sep/8/datasette-desktop/,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1466/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1083921371,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Am1Pb,1570,Separate db.execute_write() into three methods,9599,closed,0,,7571612,2,2021-12-18T18:45:54Z,2022-01-13T22:27:38Z,2021-12-18T18:57:25Z,OWNER,,"> Rather than adding a `executemany=True` parameter, I'm now thinking a better design might be to have three methods: > > - `db.execute_write(sql, params=None, block=False)` > - `db.execute_write_script(sql, block=False)` > - `db.execute_write_many(sql, params_seq, block=False)` _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1555#issuecomment-997267416_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1570/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1083895395,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Amu5j,1569,"db.execute_write(..., executescript=True) parameter",9599,closed,0,,7571612,2,2021-12-18T18:20:47Z,2022-01-13T22:27:27Z,2021-12-18T18:34:18Z,OWNER,,"> Idea: teach `execute_write` to accept an optional `executescript=True` parameter, like this: ```diff diff --git a/datasette/database.py b/datasette/database.py index 468e936..1a424f5 100644 --- a/datasette/database.py +++ b/datasette/database.py @@ -94,10 +94,14 @@ class Database: f""file:{self.path}{qs}"", uri=True, check_same_thread=False ) - async def execute_write(self, sql, params=None, block=False): + async def execute_write(self, sql, params=None, executescript=False, block=False): + assert not executescript and params, ""Cannot use params with executescript=True"" def _inner(conn): with conn: - return conn.execute(sql, params or []) + if executescript: + return conn.executescript(sql) + else: + return conn.execute(sql, params or []) with trace(""sql"", database=self.name, sql=sql.strip(), params=params): results = await self.execute_write_fn(_inner, block=block) ``` _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1555#issuecomment-997248364_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1569/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1083726550,I_kwDOBm6k_c5AmFrW,1568,Trace should show queries on the write connection too,9599,closed,0,,7571612,2,2021-12-18T02:34:12Z,2022-01-13T22:27:23Z,2021-12-18T02:42:34Z,OWNER,,"> Here's why - `trace` only applies to read, not write SQL operations: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/7c8f8aa209e4ba7bf83976f8495d67c28fbfca24/datasette/database.py#L209-L211 _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1555#issuecomment-997128508_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1568/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1083573206,I_kwDOBm6k_c5AlgPW,1563,Datasette(... files=) should not be a required argument,9599,closed,0,,7571612,2,2021-12-17T19:54:18Z,2022-01-13T22:27:18Z,2021-12-18T02:19:40Z,OWNER,,"```pycon >>> ds = Datasette(memory=True) Traceback (most recent call last): File """", line 1, in TypeError: __init__() missing 1 required positional argument: 'files' >>> ds = Datasette(memory=True, files=[]) ``` I wanted to create an in-memory Datasette for running some tests, no point in forcing me to pass `files=[]` to do that.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1563/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 712202333,MDU6SXNzdWU3MTIyMDIzMzM=,982,"SQL editor should allow execution of write queries, if you have permission",9599,open,0,,,2,2020-09-30T19:04:35Z,2022-01-13T22:21:29Z,,OWNER,,"The `datasette-write` plugin provides this at the moment https://github.com/simonw/datasette-write - but it feels like it should be a built-in capability, protected by a default permission. UI concept: if you have write permission then the existing SQL editor gets an ""execute write"" checkbox underneath it. JavaScript can spot if you appear to be trying to execute an UPDATE or INSERT or DELETE query and check that checkbox for you. If you link to a query page with a non-SELECT then that query will be displayed in the box ready for you to POST submit it. The page will also then get ""cannot be embedded"" headers to protect against clickjacking.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/982/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,