id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason
1427293909,I_kwDOBm6k_c5VEsbV,1871,API explorer tool,9599,closed,0,,8658075,24,2022-10-28T13:49:11Z,2022-11-15T19:59:05Z,2022-11-14T04:59:59Z,OWNER,,The API will be much easier to develop if there's a page that helps you execute JSON POSTs against it.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1871/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
502993509,MDU6SXNzdWU1MDI5OTM1MDk=,581,Redesign register_output_renderer callback,9599,closed,0,,5471110,24,2019-10-05T17:43:23Z,2020-05-28T02:24:14Z,2020-05-28T02:21:50Z,OWNER,,"In building https://github.com/simonw/datasette-atom it became clear that the callback function (which currently accepts just args, data and view_name) would also benefit from access to a mechanism to render templates and a `datasette` instance so it can execute SQL.

To maintain backwards compatibility with existing plugins, we can introspect the callback function to see if it wants those new arguments or not.

At a minimum I want to make `datasette` and ASGI `scope` available.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/581/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed