id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason
1978023780,I_kwDOBm6k_c515j9k,2205,request.post_vars() method obliterates form keys with multiple values,9599,open,0,,8755003,3,2023-11-05T23:25:08Z,2023-11-06T04:10:34Z,,OWNER,,"https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/452a587e236ef642cbc6ae345b58767ea8420cb5/datasette/utils/asgi.py#L137-L139

In GET requests you can do `?foo=1&foo=2` - you can do the same in POST requests, but the `dict()` call here eliminates those duplicates.

You can't even try calling `post_body()` and implement your own custom parsing because of:
- #2204",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2205/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1879209560,I_kwDOCGYnMM5wAnZY,589,Mechanism for de-registering registered SQL functions,9599,open,0,,,3,2023-09-03T19:32:39Z,2023-09-03T19:36:34Z,,OWNER,,I used a custom SQL function in a migration script and then realized that it should be de-registered before the end of the script to avoid leaking into the calling code.,140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/589/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1856075668,I_kwDOCGYnMM5uoXeU,586,.transform() fails to drop column if table is part of a view,9599,open,0,,,3,2023-08-18T05:25:22Z,2023-08-18T06:13:47Z,,OWNER,,"I got this error trying to drop a column from a table that was part of a SQL view:

> error in view plugins: no such table: main.pypi_releases

Upon further investigation I found that this pattern seemed to fix it:
```python
def transform_the_table(conn):
    # Run this in a transaction:
    with conn:
        # We have to read all the views first, because we need to drop and recreate them
        db = sqlite_utils.Database(conn)
        views = {v.name: v.schema for v in db.views if table.lower() in v.schema.lower()}
        for view in views.keys():
            db[view].drop()
        db[table].transform(
            types=types,
            rename=rename,
            drop=drop,
            column_order=[p[0] for p in order_pairs],
        )
        # Now recreate the views
        for name, schema in views.items():
            db.create_view(name, schema)
```
So grab a copy of any view that might reference this table, start a transaction, drop those views, run the transform, recreate the views again.

> I wonder if this should become an option in `sqlite-utils`? Maybe a `recreate_views=True` argument for `table.tranform(...)`? Should it be opt-in or opt-out?

_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette-edit-schema/issues/35#issuecomment-1683370548_
            ",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/586/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1838469176,I_kwDOBm6k_c5tlNA4,2127,Context base class to support documenting the context,9599,open,0,,3268330,3,2023-08-07T00:01:02Z,2023-08-10T01:30:25Z,,OWNER,,"This idea first came up here:
- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2112#issuecomment-1652751140

If `datasette.render_template(...)` takes an optional `Context` subclass as an alternative to a context dictionary, I could then use dataclasses to define the context made available to specific templates - which then gives me something I can use to help document what they are.

Also refs:
- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1510",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2127/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1822939274,I_kwDOBm6k_c5sp9iK,2113,Implement and document extras for the new query view page,9599,open,0,,8755003,3,2023-07-26T18:24:01Z,2023-08-09T17:35:22Z,,OWNER,,- #2109 ,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2113/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1054244712,I_kwDOBm6k_c4-1n9o,1510,Datasette 1.0 documented template context (maybe via API docs),9599,open,0,,3268330,3,2021-11-15T23:23:58Z,2023-06-28T02:05:21Z,,OWNER,,Documented context plus protective unit tests. Goal is that custom templates built for 1.x will not break without a 2.x release.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1510/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1618130434,I_kwDOJHON9s5gcrYC,11,Implement a SQL view to make it easier to query files in a nested folder,9599,open,0,,,3,2023-03-09T23:19:28Z,2023-03-09T23:24:01Z,,MEMBER,,"Working with nested data in SQL is tricky, can I make it easier with a view or canned query?",611552758,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/apple-notes-to-sqlite/issues/11/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1525815985,I_kwDOBm6k_c5a8hqx,1983,Make CustomJSONEncoder a documented public API,9599,open,0,,,3,2023-01-09T15:27:05Z,2023-01-09T15:35:58Z,,OWNER,,It's used by `datasette-geojson` here: https://github.com/eyeseast/datasette-geojson/commit/902bf135a5a33a0dc8264673d00a59a67cb05152,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1983/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1082584499,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Ahu2z,1558,Redesign `facet_results` JSON structure prior to Datasette 1.0,9599,open,0,,3268330,3,2021-12-16T19:45:10Z,2023-01-09T15:31:17Z,,OWNER,,"> Decision: as an initial fix I'm going to de-duplicate those keys by using `tags__array` etc - with a `_2` on the end if that key is already used.
>
> I'll open a separate issue to redesign this better for Datasette 1.0.

_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/625#issuecomment-996130862_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1558/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1175690070,I_kwDOBm6k_c5GE5tW,1676,"Reconsider ensure_permissions() logic, can it be less confusing?",9599,open,0,,3268330,3,2022-03-21T17:14:57Z,2022-12-02T01:23:40Z,,OWNER,,"> Updated documentation: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/e627510b760198ccedba9e5af47a771e847785c9/docs/internals.rst#await-ensure_permissionsactor-permissions
>
>> This method allows multiple permissions to be checked at onced. It raises a `datasette.Forbidden` exception if any of the checks are denied before one of them is explicitly granted.
>> 
>> This is useful when you need to check multiple permissions at once. For example, an actor should be able to view a table if either one of the following checks returns `True` or not a single one of them returns `False`:
>
> That's pretty hard to understand! I'm going to open a separate issue to reconsider if this is a useful enough abstraction given how confusing it is.

_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1675#issuecomment-1074177827_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1676/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1386562662,I_kwDOCGYnMM5SpURm,493,Tiny typographical error in install/uninstall docs,9599,open,0,,,3,2022-09-26T19:00:42Z,2022-10-25T21:31:15Z,,OWNER,,"Added in:
- #483

I don't know how to fix this in Sphinx: I'm getting this: https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/latest/cli.html#cli-install

> The [insert –convert](https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/latest/cli.html#cli-insert-convert) and [query –functions](https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/latest/cli.html#cli-query-functions) options

<img width=""849"" alt=""image"" src=""https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/192358225-4fae509e-9fa8-4e8d-91d4-48aa1b79225e.png"">

But I want it to display `insert --convert` and not `insert –convert` there.

Here's the code: https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/85247038f70d7eb2f3e272cfeaa4c44459cafba8/docs/cli.rst#L2125",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/493/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1410305897,I_kwDOBm6k_c5UD49p,1845,Reconsider the Datasette first-run experience,9599,open,0,,,3,2022-10-15T22:21:31Z,2022-10-16T08:54:53Z,,OWNER,,"Had a really interesting conversation today about how hard it is to get from ""I installed Datasette"" to ""I've done something useful with it"": https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33216789#33218590

Spending some time focusing on that first-run experience feels very worthwhile.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1845/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1386917344,PR_kwDOBm6k_c4_prjN,1823,Keyword-only arguments for a bunch of internal methods,9599,open,0,,,3,2022-09-27T00:44:59Z,2022-10-05T04:37:54Z,,OWNER,simonw/datasette/pulls/1823,"Refs #1822

<!-- readthedocs-preview datasette start -->
----
:books: Documentation preview :books:: https://datasette--1823.org.readthedocs.build/en/1823/

<!-- readthedocs-preview datasette end -->",107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1823/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0,
1149661489,I_kwDOCGYnMM5EhnEx,409,`with db:` for transactions,9599,open,0,,,3,2022-02-24T19:22:06Z,2022-10-01T03:42:50Z,,OWNER,,This can be a documented wrapper around `with db.conn:`.,140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/409/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1386854246,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Sqbdm,1822,Switch to keyword-only arguments for a bunch of internal methods,9599,open,0,,3268330,3,2022-09-26T23:20:38Z,2022-09-27T00:44:04Z,,OWNER,,"This is a good idea, and one that needs to happen before Datasette 1.0:

> While you are adding features, would you be future-proofing your APIs if you switched over some arguments over to keyword-only arguments or would that be too disruptive?
>
> Thinking out loud:
>
> ```
> async def render_template( 
>      self, templates, *, context=None, plugin_context=None, request=None, view_name=None 
> ): 
> ```
_Originally posted by @jefftriplett in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1817#issuecomment-1256781274_
      ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1822/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
838245338,MDU6SXNzdWU4MzgyNDUzMzg=,1272,Unit tests for the Dockerfile,9599,open,0,,,3,2021-03-23T01:36:29Z,2022-07-29T10:22:59Z,,OWNER,,"Working on the Dockerfile in #1249 made me wish for automated tests - to confirm that it boots up correctly, can run SpatiaLite and doesn't have weird bugs like the `/db` page hanging.

These could run in CI too, but maybe only if the `Dockerfile` is updated.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1272/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1054243511,I_kwDOBm6k_c4-1nq3,1509,Datasette 1.0 JSON API (and documentation),9599,open,0,,3268330,3,2021-11-15T23:22:45Z,2022-03-15T20:38:56Z,,OWNER,,"The new JSON API in a stable, documented form.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1509/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1122451096,PR_kwDOBm6k_c4x_mXy,1626,Try test suite against macOS and Windows,9599,open,0,,,3,2022-02-02T22:26:51Z,2022-02-03T01:22:44Z,,OWNER,simonw/datasette/pulls/1626,Refs #1625,107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1626/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0,
534629631,MDU6SXNzdWU1MzQ2Mjk2MzE=,650,Add a glossary to the documentation,9599,open,0,,,3,2019-12-09T00:23:45Z,2022-01-13T22:04:56Z,,OWNER,,"Call it `glossary.rst` - it can use a definition list something like this:
```rst
.. _glossary:

Glossary
========

Term
  A definition of the term.

Another term
  Another definition.
```",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/650/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
793002853,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTYwNzYwMTQ1,1204,WIP: Plugin includes,9599,open,0,,,3,2021-01-25T03:59:06Z,2021-12-17T07:10:49Z,,OWNER,simonw/datasette/pulls/1204,"Refs #1191

Next steps:

- [ ] Get comfortable that this pattern is the right way to go
- [ ] Implement it for all of the other pages, not just the table page
- [ ] Add a new set of plugin tests that exercise ALL of these new hook locations
- [ ] Document, then ship",107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1204/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1,
636511683,MDU6SXNzdWU2MzY1MTE2ODM=,830,Redesign register_facet_classes plugin hook,9599,open,0,,3268330,3,2020-06-10T20:03:27Z,2021-12-16T19:58:22Z,,OWNER,,"Nothing uses this plugin hook yet, so the design is not yet proven.

I'm going to build a real plugin against it and use that process to inform any design changes that may need to be made.

I'll add a warning about this to the documentation.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/830/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1071531082,I_kwDOCGYnMM4_3kRK,349,A way of creating indexes on newly created tables,9599,open,0,,,3,2021-12-05T18:56:12Z,2021-12-07T01:04:37Z,,OWNER,,"I'm writing code for https://github.com/simonw/git-history/issues/33 that creates a table inside a loop:

```python
item_pk = db[item_table].lookup(
    {""_item_id"": item_id},
    item_to_insert,
    column_order=(""_id"", ""_item_id""),
    pk=""_id"",
)
```
I need to look things up by `_item_id` on this table, which means I need an index on that column (the table can get very big).

But there's no mechanism in SQLite utils to detect if the table was created for the first time and add an index to it. And I don't want to run `CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS` every time through the loop.

This should work like the `foreign_keys=` mechanism.
",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/349/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1072435124,I_kwDOCGYnMM4_7A-0,350,Optional caching mechanism for table.lookup(),9599,open,0,,,3,2021-12-06T17:54:25Z,2021-12-06T17:56:57Z,,OWNER,,"Inspired by work on `git-history` where I used this pattern:
```python
    column_name_to_id = {}

    def column_id(column):
        if column not in column_name_to_id:
            id = db[""columns""].lookup(
                {""namespace"": namespace_id, ""name"": column},
                foreign_keys=((""namespace"", ""namespaces"", ""id""),),
            )
            column_name_to_id[column] = id
        return column_name_to_id[column]
```
If you're going to be doing a large number of `table.lookup(...)` calls and you know that no other script will be modifying the database at the same time you can presumably get a big speedup using a Python in-memory cache - maybe even a LRU one to avoid memory bloat.",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/350/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
952189173,MDU6SXNzdWU5NTIxODkxNzM=,3,Use HN algolia endpoint to retrieve trees,9599,open,0,,,3,2021-07-25T03:35:27Z,2021-07-25T18:41:17Z,,MEMBER,,"The `trees` command currently has to make a request for every single comment. Algolia have an endpoint that bundles the entire thread together into a single request.

`https://hn.algolia.com/api/v1/items/ID`

Here's an example that loads quickly, with about 50 comments: https://hn.algolia.com/api/v1/items/27941108

It doesn't appear to use pagination at all - if a thread is big then the response is big.

I ran this search to find some stories with more than 1000 comments: https://hn.algolia.com/api/v1/search?tags=story&numericFilters=num_comments%3E=1000

Here's one: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25015967 with 4759 comments. Hitting the API takes 41s and returns 3.7 MB of JSON!
```
wget 'https://hn.algolia.com/api/v1/items/25015967'  0.03s user 0.04s system 0% cpu 41.368 total
/tmp % ls -lah 25015967 
-rw-r--r--  1 simon  wheel   3.7M Jul 24 20:31 25015967
```",248903544,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/hacker-news-to-sqlite/issues/3/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
903902495,MDU6SXNzdWU5MDM5MDI0OTU=,1342,Improve `path_with_replaced_args()` and friends and document them,9599,open,0,,,3,2021-05-27T15:18:28Z,2021-05-27T15:23:02Z,,OWNER,,"> In order to cleanly implement this I need to expose the `path_with_replaced_args` utility function to Datasette's template engine. This is the first time this will become an exposed (and hence should-by-documented) API and I don't like its shape much.

_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1337#issuecomment-849721280_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1342/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
642296989,MDU6SXNzdWU2NDIyOTY5ODk=,856,Consider pagination of canned queries,9599,open,0,,,3,2020-06-20T03:15:59Z,2021-05-21T14:22:41Z,,OWNER,,The new `canned_queries()` plugin hook from #852 combined with plugins like https://github.com/simonw/datasette-saved-queries could mean that some installations end up with hundreds or even thousands of canned queries. I should consider pagination or some other way of ensuring that this doesn't cause performance problems for Datasette.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/856/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
741862364,MDU6SXNzdWU3NDE4NjIzNjQ=,1090,Custom widgets for canned query forms,9599,open,0,,,3,2020-11-12T19:21:07Z,2021-03-27T16:25:25Z,,OWNER,,"This is an idea that was cut from the first version of writable canned queries:

> I really want the option to use a `<textarea>` for a specific value.
> 
> Idea: metadata syntax like this:

> 
> ```json
> {
>     ""databases"": {
>        ""my-database"": {
>            ""queries"": {
>                ""add_twitter_handle"": {
>                    ""sql"": ""insert into twitter_handles (username) values (:username)"",
>                    ""write"": true,
>                    ""params"": {
>                        ""username"": {
>                             ""widget"": ""textarea""
>                        }
>                    }
>                }
>            }
>        }
>     }
> }
> ```
> 
> I can ship with some default widgets and provide a plugin hook for registering extra widgets.
>
> This opens up some really exciting possibilities for things like map widgets that let you draw polygons.

_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/698#issuecomment-608125928_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1090/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
837350092,MDU6SXNzdWU4MzczNTAwOTI=,1270,Try implementing SQLite timeouts using .interrupt() instead of using .set_progress_handler(),9599,open,0,,,3,2021-03-22T06:00:17Z,2021-03-23T16:45:39Z,,OWNER,,"> Maybe I could implement SQLite query timeouts using the `interrupt()` method instead of the progress handler hack I'm currently using?
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43240496/python-sqlite3-how-to-quickly-and-cleanly-interrupt-long-running-query-with-e has some tips.

_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1268#issuecomment-803764919_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1270/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
837956424,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTk4MjEzNTY1,1271,Use SQLite conn.interrupt() instead of sqlite_timelimit(),9599,open,0,,,3,2021-03-22T17:34:20Z,2021-03-22T21:49:27Z,,OWNER,simonw/datasette/pulls/1271,"Refs #1270, #1268, #1249

Before merging this I need to do some more testing (to make sure that expensive queries really are properly cancelled). I also need to delete a bunch of code relating to the old mechanism of cancelling queries.

[See comment below: this doesn't actually cancel the query due to a thread-local confusion]",107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1271/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",1,
769520939,MDU6SXNzdWU3Njk1MjA5Mzk=,1149,Make it easier to theme Datasette with CSS,9599,open,0,,3268330,3,2020-12-17T05:01:26Z,2021-03-22T21:43:16Z,,OWNER,,"I want to theme https://datasette.io/ so that when you visit https://datasette.io/content (the Datasette UI part of it) the navigation from the parent site is used.

I tried dropping in a `base.html` template like this:

```html
{% extends ""page_base.html"" %}

{% block base_extra_head %}

<meta name=""viewport"" content=""width=device-width, initial-scale=1, shrink-to-fit=no"">
{% for url in extra_css_urls %}
    <link rel=""stylesheet"" href=""{{ url.url }}""{% if url.sri %} integrity=""{{ url.sri }}"" crossorigin=""anonymous""{% endif %}>
{% endfor %}
{% for url in extra_js_urls %}
    <script src=""{{ url.url }}""{% if url.sri %} integrity=""{{ url.sri }}"" crossorigin=""anonymous""{% endif %}></script>
{% endfor %}
{% block extra_head %}{% endblock %}
{% endblock %}

{% block extra_body_end %}
{% include ""_close_open_menus.html"" %}

{% for body_script in body_scripts %}
    <script>{{ body_script }}</script>
{% endfor %}
{% endblock %}
```
But this resulted in pages looking like this:

<img width=""1067"" alt=""content__categories__3_rows"" src=""https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/102446045-c168e280-3fe1-11eb-94d6-e7350798eb96.png"">

Note that the cog menu is broken and the filter UI is unstyled. To get these working correctly I would need to copy over a whole lot of Datasette's default CSS - and that means that when Datasette changes in the future those pages could break in subtle ways.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1149/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
799663959,MDU6SXNzdWU3OTk2NjM5NTk=,1213,gzip support for HTML (and JSON) responses,9599,open,0,,,3,2021-02-02T20:36:28Z,2021-02-02T20:41:55Z,,OWNER,,"This page https://datasette-tiles-demo.datasette.io/San_Francisco/tiles is 2MB because of all of the base64 images. Gzipped it's 1.5MB.

Since Datasette is usually deployed without a frontend gzipping proxy, Datasette itself needs to solve for this.

Gzipping everything won't work because some endpoints - the all-rows CSV endpoint and the download-database endpoint - are streaming and hence can't be buffered-and-gzipped.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1213/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
573578548,MDU6SXNzdWU1NzM1Nzg1NDg=,89,Ability to customize columns used by extracts= feature,9599,open,0,,,3,2020-03-01T16:54:48Z,2020-10-16T19:17:50Z,,OWNER,,"@simonw any thoughts on allow extracts to specify the lookup column name? If I'm understanding the documentation right, `.lookup()` allows you to define the ""value"" column (the documentation uses name), but when you use `extracts` keyword as part of `.insert()`, `.upsert()` etc. the lookup must be done against a column named ""value"". I have an existing lookup table that I've populated with columns ""id"" and ""name"" as opposed to ""id"" and ""value"", and seems I can't use `extracts=`, unless I'm missing something...

Initial thought on how to do this would be to allow the dictionary value to be a tuple of table name column pair... so:
```
table = db.table(""trees"", extracts={""species_id"": (""Species"", ""name""})
```

I haven't dug too much into the existing code yet, but does this make sense? Worth doing?

_Originally posted by @chrishas35 in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/46#issuecomment-592999503_",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/89/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
652961907,MDU6SXNzdWU2NTI5NjE5MDc=,121,Improved (and better documented) support for transactions,9599,open,0,,,3,2020-07-08T04:56:51Z,2020-09-24T20:36:46Z,,OWNER,,"_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/pull/118#issuecomment-655283393_

We should put some thought into how this library supports and encourages smart use of transactions.",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/121/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
694493566,MDU6SXNzdWU2OTQ0OTM1NjY=,16,Timeline view,9599,open,0,,,3,2020-09-06T19:13:58Z,2020-09-21T02:42:29Z,,MEMBER,,Ability to browse (and facet) by date.,197431109,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep-beta/issues/16/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
644161221,MDU6SXNzdWU2NDQxNjEyMjE=,117,Support for compound (composite) foreign keys,9599,open,0,,,3,2020-06-23T21:33:42Z,2020-06-23T21:40:31Z,,OWNER,,"It turns out SQLite supports composite foreign keys: https://www.sqlite.org/foreignkeys.html#fk_composite

Their example looks like this:
```sql
CREATE TABLE album(
  albumartist TEXT,
  albumname TEXT,
  albumcover BINARY,
  PRIMARY KEY(albumartist, albumname)
);

CREATE TABLE song(
  songid     INTEGER,
  songartist TEXT,
  songalbum TEXT,
  songname   TEXT,
  FOREIGN KEY(songartist, songalbum) REFERENCES album(albumartist, albumname)
);
```

Here's what that looks like in sqlite-utils:

```
In [1]: import sqlite_utils                                                                                                                

In [2]: import sqlite3                                                                                                                     

In [3]: conn = sqlite3.connect("":memory:"")                                                                                                 

In [4]: conn                                                                                                                               
Out[4]: <sqlite3.Connection at 0x1087186c0>

In [5]: conn.executescript("""""" 
   ...: CREATE TABLE album( 
   ...:   albumartist TEXT, 
   ...:   albumname TEXT, 
   ...:   albumcover BINARY, 
   ...:   PRIMARY KEY(albumartist, albumname) 
   ...: ); 
   ...:  
   ...: CREATE TABLE song( 
   ...:   songid     INTEGER, 
   ...:   songartist TEXT, 
   ...:   songalbum TEXT, 
   ...:   songname   TEXT, 
   ...:   FOREIGN KEY(songartist, songalbum) REFERENCES album(albumartist, albumname) 
   ...: ); 
   ...: """""")                                                                                                                               
Out[5]: <sqlite3.Cursor at 0x1088def10>

In [6]: db = sqlite_utils.Database(conn)                                                                                                   

In [7]: db.tables                                                                                                                          
Out[7]: 
[<Table album (albumartist, albumname, albumcover)>,
 <Table song (songid, songartist, songalbum, songname)>]

In [8]: db.tables[0].foreign_keys                                                                                                          
Out[8]: []

In [9]: db.tables[1].foreign_keys                                                                                                          
Out[9]: 
[ForeignKey(table='song', column='songartist', other_table='album', other_column='albumartist'),
 ForeignKey(table='song', column='songalbum', other_table='album', other_column='albumname')]
```
The table appears to have two separate foreign keys, when actually it has a single compound composite foreign key.",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/117/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
613422636,MDU6SXNzdWU2MTM0MjI2MzY=,760,Way of seeing full schema for a database,9599,open,0,,,3,2020-05-06T15:46:08Z,2020-05-06T23:49:06Z,,OWNER,,"I find myself wanting to quickly figure out all of the BLOB columns in a database.

A `/-/schema` page showing the full schema (actually since it's per-database probably `/dbname/-/schema` or `/-/schema/dbname`) would be really handy.

It would need to be carefully constructed from various queries against `sqlite_master` - just doing `select * from sqlite_master where type='table'` isn't quite enough because I also want to show indexes, triggers etc.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/760/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
530491074,MDU6SXNzdWU1MzA0OTEwNzQ=,14,Command for importing events,9599,open,0,,,3,2019-11-29T21:28:58Z,2020-04-14T19:38:34Z,,MEMBER,,"Eg from https://api.github.com/users/simonw/events

Docs here: https://developer.github.com/v3/activity/events/#list-events-performed-by-a-user",207052882,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/14/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
465327844,MDU6SXNzdWU0NjUzMjc4NDQ=,553,Potential improvements to facet-by-date,9599,open,0,,,3,2019-07-08T15:37:53Z,2019-07-08T15:41:55Z,,OWNER,,"In addition to #483 Tobias had some useful suggestions on Twitter:

https://twitter.com/rixxtr/status/1148253926476701696
> I think for date facets, it might be more meaningful to order them by date, rather than by size? Or offer both? I'm *definitely* often interested in size-over-time, so https://data.rixx.de/django_tickets/tickets?_facet_date=created#facet-created … isn't all that helpful!

Screenshot of that link:

<img width=""1092"" alt=""django_tickets__tickets__29_846_rows"" src=""https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/60823090-9f680100-a15b-11e9-84e9-52b9d666e90f.png"">
",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/553/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
327395270,MDU6SXNzdWUzMjczOTUyNzA=,296,Per-database and per-table /-/ URL namespace,9599,open,0,,,3,2018-05-29T16:23:13Z,2019-06-28T16:46:34Z,,OWNER,,"Initially this will be for subsets of `/-/inspect` and `/-/metadata` but it will also give us a URL namespace for future features like `/-/facet` (expanded list of a specific facet, linked to from `...`) and `/-/graph`

To start:

* `/dbname/-/inspect`
* `/dbname/-/metadata`
* `/dbname/tablename/-/inspect`
* `/dbname/tablename/-/metadata`

This means we will no longer allow databases or tables to have the name `""-""` - I think that's OK

We will continue to support rows with a primary key of `""-""` at the following URL:

* `/dbname/tablename/-`",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/296/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
400340905,MDU6SXNzdWU0MDAzNDA5MDU=,402,Use SQLITE_DBCONFIG_DEFENSIVE plus other recommendations from SQLite security docs,9599,open,0,,,3,2019-01-17T15:52:28Z,2019-01-17T16:15:21Z,,OWNER,,"> Was just having a skim through the datasette source. Given that the vuln impacts shadow tables, wasn't sure whether these are also covered by the immutable flag. Latest release introduced a SQLITE_DBCONFIG_DEFENSIVE flag that they recommend setting: https://sqlite.org/security.html

https://twitter.com/ignoredambience/status/1085926961413869568",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/402/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,