id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason 1529707837,I_kwDOBm6k_c5bLX09,1988,Reconsider pattern where plugins could break existing template context,9599,open,0,,3268330,4,2023-01-11T21:13:43Z,2023-01-11T21:25:05Z,,OWNER,,"> I hadn't run into an issue with plugins like `datasette-template-sql` interfering with the existing context for other features before! Definitely not a good thing. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette-write/issues/6#issuecomment-1379490596_ ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1988/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1065429936,I_kwDOBm6k_c4_gSuw,1532,Use datasette-table Web Component to guide the design of the JSON API for 1.0,9599,open,0,,3268330,4,2021-11-28T20:37:18Z,2022-03-16T20:13:34Z,,OWNER,,"I realized that one of the reasons I'm having trouble committing to nailing down the JSON API for 1.0 is that I don't use it much myself - I use the `?_shape=array` one quite often, but I don't have any projects that are using the default, more fully-featured API. As an experiment I built a Web Component for embedding Datasette tables on pages - https://github.com/simonw/datasette-table - and I think it's actually going to be a really useful tool for helping me dog food the v1.0 API design.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1532/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1131295060,I_kwDOBm6k_c5DbjFU,1634,Update Dockerfile generated by `datasette publish`,9599,open,0,,3268330,4,2022-02-11T00:07:26Z,2022-03-11T17:38:08Z,,OWNER,,"The generated `Dockerfile` currently looks something like this: ```Dockerfile FROM python:3.8 COPY . /app WORKDIR /app ENV DATASETTE_SECRET 'edab49cbc5d5f6f33238f54852037e3fee710821960b73edd2ce743454182ae2' RUN pip install -U datasette datasette-auth-passwords datasette-tiddlywiki datasette-graphql RUN datasette inspect fixtures.db other.db --inspect-file inspect-data.json ENV PORT 8080 EXPOSE 8080 CMD datasette serve --host 0.0.0.0 -i fixtures.db -i other.db --cors --inspect-file inspect-data.json --metadata metadata.json --create --port $PORT /data/*.db ``` This is still on Python 3.8, and it generates a pretty large image compared to the `Dockerfile` used for https://hub.docker.com/datasetteproject/datasette - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/0.60.2/Dockerfile Here's the code that generates it: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/7d24fd405f3c60e4c852c5d746c91aa2ba23cf5b/datasette/utils/__init__.py#L389-L400",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1634/reactions"", ""total_count"": 2, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 2, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1154399841,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Ezr5h,1645,"Sensible `cache-control` headers for static assets, including those served by plugins",697092,open,0,,3268330,4,2022-02-28T18:12:03Z,2022-03-08T02:59:29Z,,NONE,,"## What I'm seeing With `default_cache_ttl = 86400`, I see the following: A table view returns `Cache-control: max-age=86400`: ![Screenshot_20220228_190000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/697092/156034352-4d64683e-39c8-49af-81df-0217a5957bbd.png) A static asset returns no `Cache-control` header: ![Screenshot_20220228_185933](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/697092/156034363-d0b03cc2-5889-4ed2-b601-8c1846b8469a.png) ## What I expected to see I expected the static asset to return a `Cache-control` header indicating that this response can be cached. ## Why this matters I'm productionising a Datasette deployment right now and was looking into putting it behind a Varnish instance. I was surprised to see requests for static assets being served from Datasette rather than Varnish, this is what led me to look more closely at the response headers. While Datasette serves those static assets pretty quickly, I don't see why Datasette should serve them. By their nature, static assets like images and JS files are very cacheable, so it should be easy to serve them from a cache like Varnish. (Note that Varnish can easily be configured to override this header, enabling caching for static assets. But it would be better if this override was not necessary.) ## Discussion It seems clear to me that serving static assets without a `Cache-control` header is not ideal. I see two options here: A. Static assets use the same logic as table / SQL views to set the `Cache-control` header based on `default_cache_ttl`. B. An additional setting for static assets is introduced (`default_static_cache_ttl`, say).",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1645/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1065431383,I_kwDOBm6k_c4_gTFX,1533,"Add `Link: rel=""alternate""` header pointing to JSON for a table/query",9599,closed,0,,3268330,4,2021-11-28T20:43:25Z,2022-02-02T07:56:51Z,2022-02-02T07:49:33Z,OWNER,,"Originally explored in https://github.com/simonw/datasette-notebook/issues/2#issuecomment-980789406 - I wanted an efficient way to scan a list of URLs and figure out which if any of those corresponded to Datasette tables, canned queries or SQL output that could be represented as a table on a page. It looks like a neat way to do that is with ` Link:` header like this: `Link: http://127.0.0.1:8058/fixtures/compound_three_primary_keys.json; rel=""alternate""; type=""application/datasette+json""` I can put a ` This should be: ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/492/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 570301333,MDU6SXNzdWU1NzAzMDEzMzM=,684,Add documentation on Database introspection methods to internals.rst,9599,closed,0,,3268330,4,2020-02-25T04:20:24Z,2020-06-04T18:56:15Z,2020-05-30T18:40:39Z,OWNER,,`internals.rst` will be landing as part of #683,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/684/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed