id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason
660355904,MDU6SXNzdWU2NjAzNTU5MDQ=,43,github-to-sqlite tags command for fetching tags,9599,closed,0,,,4,2020-07-18T20:14:12Z,2020-07-18T23:05:56Z,2020-07-18T21:52:15Z,MEMBER,,Fetches paginated data from https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/tags,207052882,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/43/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
611284481,MDU6SXNzdWU2MTEyODQ0ODE=,38,[Feature Request] Support Repo Name in Search 🥺,5779832,closed,0,,,4,2020-05-02T22:08:51Z,2020-05-03T02:34:32Z,2020-05-02T23:15:11Z,NONE,,"## Description
Per your [v2.2 release tweet](https://twitter.com/simonw/status/1256700238099693568) I played with the demo, but the output did not match my expectations.

## Expected Behavior
Expected a search query for ""twitter"" contained within the `repo` column to return non-zero results.

## Actual Behavior
😭  [0 rows where repo contains ""twitter"" sorted by starred_at descending](https://github-to-sqlite.dogsheep.net/github/stars?repo__contains=twitter&_sort_desc=starred_at) 

## Best Explanation
Per the table schema (see appendix) `repo` is of type `INTEGER` which built from `repo_id` and does not expose the repo name in search.

## Desired Behavior
Given that searching for ""206156866"" is less intuitive than ""twitter"",  it would be great to support this via extending the search capabilities or by adding an additional column.

✅ 104 rows where repo contains ""twitter""
❌  [104 rows where repo contains ""206156866"" sorted by starred_at descending](https://github-to-sqlite.dogsheep.net/github/stars?repo__contains=206156866&_sort_desc=starred_at) 

## Appendix
```
CREATE TABLE [stars] (
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]),
   [starred_at] TEXT,
   PRIMARY KEY ([user], [repo])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_stars_repo]
                ON [stars] ([repo]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_stars_user]
                ON [stars] ([user]);
```",207052882,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/38/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
609950090,MDU6SXNzdWU2MDk5NTAwOTA=,33,Fall back to authentication via ENV,2029,closed,0,,,4,2020-04-30T12:58:14Z,2020-05-02T18:46:10Z,2020-05-02T18:45:37Z,NONE,,"Would you accept a PR that falls back to looking for an environment variable for the GitHub token? Specifically a change here:
https://github.com/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/blob/c34d5a18bfc41fa08755ba3d5cf9fe09ff204238/github_to_sqlite/cli.py#L271

I'd like to use `github-to-sqlite` in a GitHub Action workflow and this would be simpler than trying to fill out the prompt or generate a file with sensitive content.

Wanted to check first, I'm happy to submit a PR with tests and updates to the docs. ",207052882,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/33/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
546051181,MDU6SXNzdWU1NDYwNTExODE=,16,Exception running first command: IndexError: list index out of range,15092,closed,0,,,4,2020-01-07T03:01:58Z,2020-04-14T18:37:21Z,2020-04-14T18:37:21Z,NONE,,"Exception running first command without an existing db or auth.

```py
> mkdir ~/.github/coala
> /usr/bin/github-to-sqlite repos ~/.github/coala coala
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File ""/usr/bin/github-to-sqlite"", line 11, in <module>
    load_entry_point('github-to-sqlite==0.6', 'console_scripts', 'github-to-sqlite')()
  File ""/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/click/core.py"", line 764, in __call__
    return self.main(*args, **kwargs)
  File ""/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/click/core.py"", line 717, in main
    rv = self.invoke(ctx)
  File ""/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/click/core.py"", line 1137, in invoke
    return _process_result(sub_ctx.command.invoke(sub_ctx))
  File ""/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/click/core.py"", line 956, in invoke
    return ctx.invoke(self.callback, **ctx.params)
  File ""/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/click/core.py"", line 555, in invoke
    return callback(*args, **kwargs)
  File ""/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/github_to_sqlite/cli.py"", line 163, in repos
    utils.save_repo(db, repo)
  File ""/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/github_to_sqlite/utils.py"", line 120, in save_repo
    to_save[""owner""] = save_user(db, to_save[""owner""])
  File ""/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/github_to_sqlite/utils.py"", line 61, in save_user
    return db[""users""].upsert(to_save, pk=""id"", alter=True).last_pk
  File ""/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sqlite_utils/db.py"", line 1135, in upsert
    extracts=extracts,
  File ""/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sqlite_utils/db.py"", line 1162, in upsert_all
    upsert=True,
  File ""/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sqlite_utils/db.py"", line 1105, in insert_all
    row = list(self.rows_where(""rowid = ?"", [self.last_rowid]))[0]
IndexError: list index out of range
```",207052882,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/16/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
544571092,MDU6SXNzdWU1NDQ1NzEwOTI=,15,Assets table with downloads,2029,closed,0,,5225818,4,2020-01-02T13:05:28Z,2020-03-28T12:17:01Z,2020-03-23T19:17:32Z,NONE,,"The `releases` command extracts the releases table, but data about the individual assets are locked up in the JSON document in the `assets` field. My main interest is in individual and aggregate download counts. I was wondering if creating a new table with a record per asset may be useful?
If so I'm happy to send a PR when I get a moment. Do you have opinions about that simply being part of the `releases` command or would you prefer a separate command as well?",207052882,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/github-to-sqlite/issues/15/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed