id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason
743384829,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTIxMjg3OTk0,203,changes to allow for compound foreign keys,1049910,open,0,,,7,2020-11-16T00:30:10Z,2023-01-25T18:47:18Z,,FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR,simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/203,"Add support for compound foreign keys, as per issue #117 

Not sure if this is the right approach. In particular I'm unsure about:

 - the new `ForeignKey` class, which replaces the namedtuple in order to ensure that `column` and `other_column` are forced into tuples. The class does the job, but doesn't feel very elegant.
 - I haven't rewritten `guess_foreign_table` to take account of multiple columns, so it just checks for the first column in the foreign key definition. This isn't ideal.
 - I haven't added any ability to the CLI to add compound foreign keys, it's only in the python API at the moment.

The PR also contains a minor related change that columns and tables are always quoted in foreign key definitions.",140912432,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/203/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 1, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0,