id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason 1907765514,I_kwDOBm6k_c5xtjEK,2195,`datasette publish` needs support for the new config/metadata split,9599,open,0,,,9,2023-09-21T21:08:12Z,2023-09-21T22:57:48Z,,OWNER,,"> ... which raises the challenge that `datasette publish` doesn't yet know what to do with a config file! _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2194#issuecomment-1730259871_ ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2195/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 774332247,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTQ1MjY0NDM2,1159,Improve the display of facets information,552629,open,0,,3268330,9,2020-12-24T11:01:47Z,2023-07-31T18:57:59Z,,FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR,simonw/datasette/pulls/1159,"This PR changes the display of facets to hopefully make them more readable. Before | After ---|--- ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/552629/103084609-b1ec2980-45df-11eb-85bc-68ab8df3e8d9.png) | ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/552629/103085220-620e6200-45e1-11eb-8189-5dd5d3e2569e.png) ",107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1159/reactions"", ""total_count"": 4, ""+1"": 4, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0, 1663399821,I_kwDOBm6k_c5jJXeN,2058,"500 ""attempt to write a readonly database"" error caused by ""PRAGMA schema_version""",9599,open,0,,,9,2023-04-11T23:57:50Z,2023-04-13T16:35:21Z,,OWNER,,"I've not been able to replicate this myself yet, but I've seen log files from a user affected by it. ``` File ""/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/datasette/views/base.py"", line 89, in dispatch_request await self.ds.refresh_schemas() File ""/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/datasette/app.py"", line 371, in refresh_schemas await self._refresh_schemas() File ""/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/datasette/app.py"", line 386, in _refresh_schemas schema_version = (await db.execute(""PRAGMA schema_version"")).first()[0] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File ""/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/datasette/database.py"", line 267, in execute results = await self.execute_fn(sql_operation_in_thread) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File ""/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/datasette/database.py"", line 213, in execute_fn return await asyncio.get_event_loop().run_in_executor( ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File ""/usr/local/lib/python3.11/concurrent/futures/thread.py"", line 58, in run result = self.fn(*self.args, **self.kwargs) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File ""/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/datasette/database.py"", line 211, in in_thread return fn(conn) ^^^^^^^^ File ""/usr/local/lib/python3.11/site-packages/datasette/database.py"", line 237, in sql_operation_in_thread cursor.execute(sql, params if params is not None else {}) sqlite3.OperationalError: attempt to write a readonly database ``` That's running the official Datasette Docker image on https://fly.io/ - it's causing 500 errors on every page of their site.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2058/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 702386948,MDU6SXNzdWU3MDIzODY5NDg=,159,.delete_where() does not auto-commit (unlike .insert() or .upsert()),11712349,open,0,,,9,2020-09-16T01:55:52Z,2023-04-01T17:21:05Z,,NONE,,"When you use the delete_where() function on a table, it never commits.... Is that intentional?",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/159/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1323346408,I_kwDOBm6k_c5O4Kno,1775,i18n support,428820,open,0,,,9,2022-07-31T02:51:04Z,2023-02-10T18:04:40Z,,NONE,,"I want contribute for translate UI to es, de, de and it if you share strings",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1775/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1015646369,I_kwDOBm6k_c48iYih,1480,Exceeding Cloud Run memory limits when deploying a 4.8G database,110420,open,0,,,9,2021-10-04T21:20:24Z,2022-10-07T04:39:10Z,,CONTRIBUTOR,,"When I try to deploy a 4.8G SQLite database to Google Cloud Run, I get this error message: > Memory limit of 8192M exceeded with 8826M used. Consider increasing the memory limit, see https://cloud.google.com/run/docs/configuring/memory-limits Unfortunately, the maximum amount of memory that can be allocated to an instance is 8192M. Naively profiling the memory usage of running Datasette with this database locally on my MacBook shows the following memory usage (using Activity Monitor) when I just start up Datasette locally: - Real Memory Size: 70.6 MB - Virtual Memory Size: 4.51 GB - Shared Memory Size: 2.5 MB - Private Memory Size: 57.4 MB I'm trying to understand if there's a query or other operation that gets run during container deployment that causes memory use to be so large and if this can be avoided somehow. This is somewhat related to #1082, but on a different platform, so I decided to open a new issue.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1480/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1374939463,I_kwDOCGYnMM5R8-lH,489,Ability to load JSON records held in a file with a single top level key that is a list of objects,9599,open,0,,,9,2022-09-15T18:46:03Z,2022-09-15T20:56:10Z,,OWNER,,"It's very common for JSON to look like this: ```json { ""Version"": ""5.5.52.6"", ""List"": [ { ""Description"": ""Nonpartisan"", ""Id"": 1, ""ExternalId"": """" }, { ""Description"": ""Undeclared"", ""Id"": 2, ""ExternalId"": """" } ] } ``` This example taken from the records downloaded from https://www.elections.alaska.gov/election-results/e/ Right now you can't import this into `sqlite-utils` - you need to run it through `jq .List` first. But since this is so common, it would be neat if `sqlite-utils` could have a rule of thumb that says ""if it's an object, but it has a single key that is is a list of objects, use that instead"".",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/489/reactions"", ""total_count"": 2, ""+1"": 2, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 507454958,MDU6SXNzdWU1MDc0NTQ5NTg=,596,Handle really wide tables better,9599,open,0,,,9,2019-10-15T20:05:46Z,2022-09-07T00:58:41Z,,OWNER,,"If a table has hundreds of columns the Datasette UI starts getting unwieldy. Addressing this would be neat. One option would be to only select the first 30 columns by default and provide a UI for selecting more.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/596/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1294641696,I_kwDOBm6k_c5NKqog,1767,Ability to set a custom favicon,9599,open,0,,,9,2022-07-05T18:41:12Z,2022-07-05T18:56:43Z,,OWNER,,"If you're running a website on Datasette, like https://www.niche-museums.com/ or https://til.simonwillison.net/ - you should have the ability to easily specify a custom favicon. Currently the `/favicon.ico` view is hard-coded to do this: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/9f1eb0d4eac483b953392157bd9fd6cc4df37de7/datasette/app.py#L179-L188",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1767/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 607223136,MDU6SXNzdWU2MDcyMjMxMzY=,741,"Replace ""datasette publish --extra-options"" with ""--setting""",9599,open,0,,3268330,9,2020-04-27T04:29:04Z,2022-05-12T19:21:16Z,,OWNER,,"See https://github.com/simonw/datasette-publish-now/issues/9#issuecomment-618155764 - the `--extra-options` mechanism is in practice just used to set `--config` options in data that you publish, but that means you end up with pretty messy looking commands: datasette publish my.db --extra-options=""--config default_page_size:50 --config sql_time_limit_ms:3500"" A neater design would be to support `--config` as an option for `datasette publish` directly: datasette publish my.db --config default_page_size:50 --config sql_time_limit_ms:3500 ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/741/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 776634318,MDU6SXNzdWU3NzY2MzQzMTg=,1164,Mechanism for minifying JavaScript that ships with Datasette,9599,open,0,,,9,2020-12-30T20:59:06Z,2022-01-13T22:21:29Z,,OWNER,,"> If I'm going to minify it I'll need to figure out a build step in Datasette itself so that I can easily work on that minified version. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752748496_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1164/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 776635426,MDU6SXNzdWU3NzY2MzU0MjY=,1165,Mechanism for executing JavaScript unit tests,9599,open,0,,,9,2020-12-30T21:02:34Z,2022-01-13T22:21:29Z,,OWNER,,"> I'm going to need to add JavaScript unit tests for this new plugin system. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/983#issuecomment-752757289_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1165/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1066603133,PR_kwDOCGYnMM4vKAzW,347,Test against pysqlite3 running SQLite 3.37,9599,open,0,,,9,2021-11-29T23:17:57Z,2021-12-11T01:02:19Z,,OWNER,simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/347,Refs #346 and #344.,140912432,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/347/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0, 964322136,MDU6SXNzdWU5NjQzMjIxMzY=,1426,"Manage /robots.txt in Datasette core, block robots by default",9599,open,0,,,9,2021-08-09T19:56:56Z,2021-12-04T07:11:29Z,,OWNER,,"See accompanying Twitter thread: https://twitter.com/simonw/status/1424820203603431439 > Datasette currently has a plugin for configuring robots.txt, but I'm beginning to think it should be part of core and crawlers should be blocked by default - having people explicitly opt-in to having their sites crawled and indexed feels a lot safer https://datasette.io/plugins/datasette-block-robots I have a lot of Datasettes deployed now, and tailing logs shows that they are being *hammered* by search engine crawlers even though many of them are not interesting enough to warrant indexing. I'm starting to think blocking crawlers would actually be a better default for most people, provided it was well documented and easy to understand how to allow them. Default-deny is usually a better policy than default-allow!",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1426/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 275125561,MDU6SXNzdWUyNzUxMjU1NjE=,123,Datasette serve should accept paths/URLs to CSVs and other file formats,9599,open,0,,,9,2017-11-19T02:05:48Z,2021-07-19T00:04:32Z,,OWNER,,"This would remove the csvs-to-sqlite step which I end up using for almost everything. I'm hesitant to introduce pandas as a required dependency though since it require compiling numpy. Could build it so this option is only available if you have pandas installed.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/123/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 1, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 763361458,MDU6SXNzdWU3NjMzNjE0NTg=,1142,"""Stream all rows"" is not at all obvious",9599,open,0,,,9,2020-12-12T06:24:57Z,2021-06-17T18:12:31Z,,OWNER,,"Got a question about how to download all rows - the current option isn't at all clear. ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1142/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 496415321,MDU6SXNzdWU0OTY0MTUzMjE=,1,Figure out some interesting example SQL queries,9599,open,0,,,9,2019-09-20T15:28:07Z,2021-05-03T03:46:23Z,,MEMBER,,My knowledge of genetics has left me short here. I'd love to be able to provide some interesting example SELECT queries - maybe one that spots if you are [likely to have red hair?](https://www.snpedia.com/index.php/Rs1805007),209590345,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/genome-to-sqlite/issues/1/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,