id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason
312313496,MDU6SXNzdWUzMTIzMTM0OTY=,195,"Run pks_for_table in inspect, executing once at build time rather than constantly",9599,closed,0,,,3,2018-04-08T15:12:40Z,2018-04-10T00:54:43Z,2018-04-10T00:54:43Z,OWNER,,"Right now several Datasette views call the `await self.pks_for_table(...)` method to figure out what primary keys are set for a specific table. This executes a `PRAGMA table_info` SQL query.

It would be faster and more efficient to execute this query for each table as part of the `inspect()` method.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/195/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
312312125,MDU6SXNzdWUzMTIzMTIxMjU=,194,Rename table_rows and filtered_table_rows to have _count suffix,9599,closed,0,,,2,2018-04-08T14:53:37Z,2018-04-09T05:25:22Z,2018-04-09T05:25:22Z,OWNER,,"These fields represent counts of items:

    ""table_rows"": 131,
    ""filtered_table_rows"": 8,

But the names make it sound like they might be arrays full of rows. Adding a `_count` suffix would make this more clear:

    ""table_rows_count"": 131,
    ""filtered_table_rows_count"": 8,
",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/194/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed