id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason 465327844,MDU6SXNzdWU0NjUzMjc4NDQ=,553,Potential improvements to facet-by-date,9599,open,0,,,3,2019-07-08T15:37:53Z,2019-07-08T15:41:55Z,,OWNER,,"In addition to #483 Tobias had some useful suggestions on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rixxtr/status/1148253926476701696 > I think for date facets, it might be more meaningful to order them by date, rather than by size? Or offer both? I'm *definitely* often interested in size-over-time, so https://data.rixx.de/django_tickets/tickets?_facet_date=created#facet-created … isn't all that helpful! Screenshot of that link: ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/553/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 465019882,MDU6SXNzdWU0NjUwMTk4ODI=,552,"Add --plugin-secret support to ""datasette package""",9599,open,0,,,1,2019-07-08T01:46:47Z,2019-07-08T01:47:30Z,,OWNER,,"Split out from #544. I think I should combine this with #347 (renaming `datasette package` to `datasette publish docker`).",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/552/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,