id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason
925677191,MDU6SXNzdWU5MjU2NzcxOTE=,289,Mypy fixes for rows_from_file(),857609,closed,0,,,3,2021-06-20T20:34:59Z,2021-06-22T18:44:36Z,2021-06-22T18:13:26Z,NONE,,"Following https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/279#issuecomment-864328927

You had two mypy errors.

The first:

> sqlite_utils/utils.py:157: error: Argument 1 to ""BufferedReader"" has incompatible type ""BinaryIO""; expected ""RawIOBase""

Looking at the `BufferedReader` docs, it seems to expect a `RawIOBase`, and this [has been copied into typeshed](https://github.com/python/typeshed/blob/9ec2f8712480c57353cea097a65d75a2c4ec1846/stdlib/io.pyi#L100). There may be scope to change how `BufferedReader` is documented and typed upstream, but for now it wouldn't be too bad to use a `typing.cast()`:

```
# Detect the format, then call this recursively
buffered = io.BufferedReader(
    cast(io.RawIOBase, fp),  # Undocumented BufferedReader support for BinaryIO
    buffer_size=4096,
)
```

The second error seems to be flagging a legitimate bug in your code:

> sqlite_utils/utils.py:163: error: Argument 1 to ""decode"" of ""bytes"" has incompatible type ""Optional[str]""; expected ""str""

From your type hints, `encoding` may be `None`. In the CSV format block, you use `encoding or ""utf-8-sig""` to set a default, maybe that's desirable in this case too?
",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/289/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 1, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
925544070,MDU6SXNzdWU5MjU1NDQwNzA=,287,Update rowid examples in the docs,9599,closed,0,,,0,2021-06-20T08:03:00Z,2021-06-20T18:26:21Z,2021-06-20T18:26:21Z,OWNER,,Changed in #284 - a couple of examples need updating on https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/3.10/docs/cli.rst.,140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/287/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
925545468,MDU6SXNzdWU5MjU1NDU0Njg=,288,sqlite-utils memory blah.json --schema,9599,closed,0,,,0,2021-06-20T08:10:40Z,2021-06-20T18:26:21Z,2021-06-20T18:26:21Z,OWNER,,Like `--dump` but only outputs the schema - useful for understanding what you are about to run queries against.,140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/288/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
925491857,MDU6SXNzdWU5MjU0OTE4NTc=,1383,Improve test coverage for `inspect.py`,9599,open,0,,,0,2021-06-20T00:22:43Z,2021-06-20T00:22:49Z,,OWNER,,https://codecov.io/gh/simonw/datasette/src/main/datasette/inspect.py shows only 36% coverage for that module at the moment.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1383/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,