id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason 1400121355,PR_kwDOBm6k_c5AVujU,1835,use inspect data for hash and file size,536941,closed,0,,,3,2022-10-06T18:25:24Z,2022-10-27T20:51:30Z,2022-10-06T20:06:07Z,CONTRIBUTOR,simonw/datasette/pulls/1835,"`inspect_data` should already include the hash and the db file size, so this PR takes advantage of using those instead of always recalculating. should help a lot on startup with large DBs. closes #1834 ",107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1835/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0, 1400431789,PR_kwDOBm6k_c5AWyQK,1837,Make hash and size a lazy property,536941,closed,0,,,2,2022-10-06T23:51:22Z,2022-10-27T20:51:21Z,2022-10-27T20:51:20Z,CONTRIBUTOR,simonw/datasette/pulls/1837,"Many apologies, @simonw. My previous PR #1835 did not really solve the problem because the name of the database is often not known to database object in the init method. I took a cue from how you dealt with this issue and made hash a lazy property and did something similar with size. ---- :books: Documentation preview :books:: https://datasette--1837.org.readthedocs.build/en/1837/ ",107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1837/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0, 1400374908,I_kwDOBm6k_c5TeAZ8,1836,docker image is duplicating db files somehow,536941,open,0,,,13,2022-10-06T22:35:54Z,2022-10-08T16:56:51Z,,CONTRIBUTOR,,"if you look into the docker image created by docker publish, the `datasette inspect` line is duplicating the db files. here's the result of the inspect command: ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1836/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1400083043,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Tc5Jj,1834,inspect data is not used for caching database hash,536941,closed,0,,,0,2022-10-06T17:52:01Z,2022-10-06T20:06:21Z,2022-10-06T20:06:08Z,CONTRIBUTOR,,"When databases are loaded, https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/cb1e093fd361b758120aefc1a444df02462389a3/datasette/app.py#L257-L260 there is nothing preventing the rehashing of the database for immutable databases. https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/cb1e093fd361b758120aefc1a444df02462389a3/datasette/database.py#L50-L53 what i might expect is that relevant values of `inspect_data` get passed to the `Database` class to prevent re-hashing? With data that is many gigs large, this is a significant start up time. ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1834/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1399933513,I_kwDOBm6k_c5TcUpJ,1833,Ability to submit long queries by POST,9599,open,0,,,0,2022-10-06T16:03:26Z,2022-10-06T16:18:00Z,,OWNER,,"Datasette doesn't limit URL lengths but some common web proxies do - the one in front of Google Cloud Run for example limits to 8KB total for incoming request headers: https://cloud.google.com/load-balancing/docs/quotas#https-lb-header-limits This means longer SQL queries can break! Need an optional mechanism for submitting queries by POST instead.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1833/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,