id,node_id,number,title,user,user_label,state,locked,assignee,assignee_label,milestone,milestone_label,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,repo_label,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason
323658641,MDU6SXNzdWUzMjM2NTg2NDE=,262,Add ?_extra= mechanism for requesting extra properties in JSON,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,27,2018-05-16T14:55:42Z,2023-03-29T06:22:22Z,,OWNER,,"Datasette views currently work by creating a set of data that should be returned as JSON, then defining an additional, optional `template_data()` function which is called if the view is being rendered as HTML.
This `template_data()` function calculates extra template context variables which are necessary for the HTML view but should not be included in the JSON.
Example of how that is used today: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/2b79f2bdeb1efa86e0756e741292d625f91cb93d/datasette/views/table.py#L672-L704
With features like Facets in #255 I'm beginning to want to move more items into the `template_data()` - in the case of facets it's the `suggested_facets` array. This saves that feature from being calculated (involving several SQL queries) for the JSON case where it is unlikely to be used.
But... as an API user, I want to still optionally be able to access that information.
Solution: Add a `?_extra=suggested_facets&_extra=table_metadata` argument which can be used to optionally request additional blocks to be added to the JSON API.
Then redefine as many of the current `template_data()` features as extra arguments instead, and teach Datasette to return certain extras by default when rendering templates.
This could allow the JSON representation to be slimmed down further (removing e.g. the `table_definition` and `view_definition` keys) while still making that information available to API users who need it.",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/262/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
374953006,MDU6SXNzdWUzNzQ5NTMwMDY=,369,Interface should show same JSON shape options for custom SQL queries,416374,gfrmin,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,2,2018-10-29T10:39:15Z,2020-05-30T17:24:06Z,,CONTRIBUTOR,,"At the moment the page returning a custom SQL query shows the JSON and CSV APIs, but not the multiple JSON shapes. However, adding the `_shape` parameter to the JSON API URL manually still works, so perhaps there should be consistency in the interface by having the same ""Advanced Export"" box for custom SQL queries.",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/369/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
443021509,MDU6SXNzdWU0NDMwMjE1MDk=,461,Paginate + search for databases/tables on the homepage,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,4,2019-05-11T18:05:34Z,2020-12-17T22:14:46Z,,OWNER,,Split out from #460 - in order to support large numbers of connected databases the homepage needs to be paginated.,107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/461/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
531502365,MDU6SXNzdWU1MzE1MDIzNjU=,646,Make database level information from metadata.json available in the index.html template,18017473,lagolucas,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,3,2019-12-02T19:55:10Z,2022-03-15T20:50:34Z,,NONE,,"Did a search on the issues here and didn't find anything related to what I want.
I want to have information that is on the database level of the JSON like title, source and source_url, and use it on the index page.
I tried some small tweaks on the python and html files, but failed to get that result.
Is there a way? Thanks!",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/646/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
607223136,MDU6SXNzdWU2MDcyMjMxMzY=,741,"Replace ""datasette publish --extra-options"" with ""--setting""",9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,9,2020-04-27T04:29:04Z,2022-05-12T19:21:16Z,,OWNER,,"See https://github.com/simonw/datasette-publish-now/issues/9#issuecomment-618155764 - the `--extra-options` mechanism is in practice just used to set `--config` options in data that you publish, but that means you end up with pretty messy looking commands:
datasette publish my.db --extra-options=""--config default_page_size:50 --config sql_time_limit_ms:3500""
A neater design would be to support `--config` as an option for `datasette publish` directly:
datasette publish my.db --config default_page_size:50 --config sql_time_limit_ms:3500
",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/741/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
626593402,MDU6SXNzdWU2MjY1OTM0MDI=,780,Internals documentation for datasette.metadata() method,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,2,2020-05-28T15:14:22Z,2022-03-15T20:50:34Z,,OWNER,,https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/40885ef24e32d91502b6b8bbad1c7376f50f2830/datasette/app.py#L297-L328,107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/780/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
636511683,MDU6SXNzdWU2MzY1MTE2ODM=,830,Redesign register_facet_classes plugin hook,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,3,2020-06-10T20:03:27Z,2021-12-16T19:58:22Z,,OWNER,,"Nothing uses this plugin hook yet, so the design is not yet proven.
I'm going to build a real plugin against it and use that process to inform any design changes that may need to be made.
I'll add a warning about this to the documentation.",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/830/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
648435885,MDU6SXNzdWU2NDg0MzU4ODU=,878,"New pattern for views that return either JSON or HTML, available for plugins",9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,26,2020-06-30T19:26:13Z,2022-03-19T16:19:30Z,,OWNER,,"Can be part of #870 - refactoring existing views to use `register_routes()`.
> I'm going to put the new `check_permissions()` method on `BaseView` as well. If I want that method to be available to plugins I can do so by turning that `BaseView` class into a documented API that plugins are encouraged to use themselves.
_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/832#issuecomment-651995453_",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/878/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
668064026,MDU6SXNzdWU2NjgwNjQwMjY=,911,"Rethink the --name option to ""datasette publish""",9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,0,2020-07-29T18:49:49Z,2020-07-29T18:49:49Z,,OWNER,,`--name` works inconsistently across the different publish providers - on Cloud Run you should use `--service` instead for example. Need to review it across all of them and either remove it or clarify what it does.,107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/911/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
678760988,MDU6SXNzdWU2Nzg3NjA5ODg=,932,End-user documentation,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,6,2020-08-13T22:04:39Z,2022-03-08T15:20:48Z,,OWNER,,"Datasette's documentation is aimed at people who install and configure it.
What about end users of preconfigured and deployed Datasette instances?
Something that can be linked to from the Datasette UI would be really useful.",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/932/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
687694947,MDU6SXNzdWU2ODc2OTQ5NDc=,954,Remove old register_output_renderer dict mechanism in Datasette 1.0,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,1,2020-08-28T04:04:23Z,2020-08-28T04:56:31Z,,OWNER,,"> Documentation says that the old dictionary mechanism will be deprecated by 1.0:
>
> https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/799ecae94824640bdff21f86997f69844048d5c3/docs/plugin_hooks.rst#L460
_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/953#issuecomment-682312494_",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/954/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
718540751,MDU6SXNzdWU3MTg1NDA3NTE=,1012,For 1.0 update trove classifier in setup.py,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,5,2020-10-10T05:52:08Z,2021-11-16T13:18:36Z,,OWNER,, Development Status :: 5 - Production/Stable,107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1012/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
730210880,MDU6SXNzdWU3MzAyMTA4ODA=,1055,query.html and table.html should share the same table implementation,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,0,2020-10-27T07:58:21Z,2020-10-27T07:58:29Z,,OWNER,,In #998 I made a change that affected the table page but didn't affect the query page because I incorrectly assumed they shared rendering logic.,107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1055/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
732674148,MDU6SXNzdWU3MzI2NzQxNDg=,1062,Refactor .csv to be an output renderer - and teach register_output_renderer to stream all rows,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,5,2020-10-29T21:25:02Z,2022-09-28T14:09:54Z,,OWNER,,This can drive the upgrade of the `register_output_renderer` hook to be able to handle streaming all rows in a large query.,107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1062/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
734777631,MDU6SXNzdWU3MzQ3Nzc2MzE=,1080,"""View all"" option for facets, to provide a (paginated) list of ALL of the facet counts plus a link to view them",9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,7,2020-11-02T19:55:06Z,2022-02-04T06:25:18Z,,OWNER,,Can use `/database/-/...` namespace from #296,107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1080/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
749283032,MDU6SXNzdWU3NDkyODMwMzI=,1101,register_output_renderer() should support streaming data,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,13,2020-11-24T02:17:09Z,2023-01-21T22:07:19Z,,OWNER,,"> I'd like to implement this by first extending the `register_output_renderer()` hook to support streaming huge responses, then switching CSV to use the plugin hook in addition to TSV using it.
_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1096#issuecomment-732542285_",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1101/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
750089847,MDU6SXNzdWU3NTAwODk4NDc=,1109,Deprecate --config in Datasette 1.0 (in favour of --setting),9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,0,2020-11-24T21:43:57Z,2020-12-17T22:07:49Z,,OWNER,,I added a deprecation warning to this in #992.,107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1109/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
764059235,MDU6SXNzdWU3NjQwNTkyMzU=,1143,"More flexible CORS support in core, to encourage good security practices",114388,yurivish,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,6,2020-12-12T17:06:35Z,2022-02-13T17:41:17Z,,NONE,,"It would be nice if the `--cors` option accepted an origin regex to more securely allow secure local development.
As an example, Observable notebooks namespace every user's notebooks by their username and user content is served from username.observableusercontent.com, so you would set `--cors-origin username.observableusercontent.com` to restrict access to a local development Datasette instance to only your own notebooks, rather than exposing the data to any website that makes a request.
Thank you for all of your work on Datasette!",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1143/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
769520939,MDU6SXNzdWU3Njk1MjA5Mzk=,1149,Make it easier to theme Datasette with CSS,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,3,2020-12-17T05:01:26Z,2021-03-22T21:43:16Z,,OWNER,,"I want to theme https://datasette.io/ so that when you visit https://datasette.io/content (the Datasette UI part of it) the navigation from the parent site is used.
I tried dropping in a `base.html` template like this:
```html
{% extends ""page_base.html"" %}
{% block base_extra_head %}
{% for url in extra_css_urls %}
{% endfor %}
{% for url in extra_js_urls %}
{% endfor %}
{% block extra_head %}{% endblock %}
{% endblock %}
{% block extra_body_end %}
{% include ""_close_open_menus.html"" %}
{% for body_script in body_scripts %}
{% endfor %}
{% endblock %}
```
But this resulted in pages looking like this:
Note that the cog menu is broken and the filter UI is unstyled. To get these working correctly I would need to copy over a whole lot of Datasette's default CSS - and that means that when Datasette changes in the future those pages could break in subtle ways.",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1149/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
774332247,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTQ1MjY0NDM2,1159,Improve the display of facets information,552629,lovasoa,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,9,2020-12-24T11:01:47Z,2023-07-31T18:57:59Z,,FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR,simonw/datasette/pulls/1159,"This PR changes the display of facets to hopefully make them more readable.
Before | After
---|---
 | 
",107914493,datasette,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1159/reactions"", ""total_count"": 4, ""+1"": 4, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0,
780153562,MDU6SXNzdWU3ODAxNTM1NjI=,1177,Ability to stream all rows as newline-delimited JSON,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,1,2021-01-06T07:10:48Z,2022-03-21T15:08:52Z,,OWNER,,"> Yet another use-case for this: I want to be able to stream newline-delimited JSON in order to better import into Pandas:
>
> pandas.read_json(""https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/compound_three_primary_keys.json?_shape=array&_nl=on"", lines=True)
_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1101#issuecomment-755128038_",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1177/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
787098345,MDU6SXNzdWU3ODcwOTgzNDU=,1191,Ability for plugins to collaborate when adding extra HTML to blocks in default templates,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,12,2021-01-15T18:18:51Z,2023-09-18T06:55:52Z,,OWNER,,"Sometimes a plugin may want to add content to an existing default template - for example `datasette-search-all` adds a new search box at the top of `index.html`. I also want `datasette-upload-csvs` to add a CTA on the `database.html` page: https://github.com/simonw/datasette-upload-csvs/issues/18
Currently plugins can do this by providing a new version of the `index.html` template - but if multiple plugins try to do that only one of them will succeed.
It would be better if there were known areas of those templates which plugins could add additional content to, such that multiple plugins can use the same spot.",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1191/reactions"", ""total_count"": 4, ""+1"": 4, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
812704869,MDU6SXNzdWU4MTI3MDQ4Njk=,1237,?_pretty=1 option for pretty-printing JSON output,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,1,2021-02-20T20:54:40Z,2021-11-16T18:28:33Z,,OWNER,,Suggested by @frankieroberto in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/782#issuecomment-782746755,107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1237/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
957315684,MDU6SXNzdWU5NTczMTU2ODQ=,1410,Rename settings to `default_allow_facet` and `default_allow_download` and `default_allow_csv_stream`,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,0,2021-07-31T20:27:12Z,2021-07-31T20:27:49Z,,OWNER,,"> If I was prone to over-thinking (which I am) I'd note that `allow_facet` and `allow_download` and `allow_csv_stream` are all settings that do NOT have an equivalent in the newer permissions system, which is itself a little weird and inconsistent.
>
> So maybe there's a future task where I introduce those as both permissions and metadata `""allow_x""` blocks, then rename the settings themselves to be called `default_allow_facet` and `default_allow_download` and `default_allow_csv_stream`.
>
> If I was going to do that I should get it in before Datasette 1.0.
_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1409#issuecomment-890400425_",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1410/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1054243511,I_kwDOBm6k_c4-1nq3,1509,Datasette 1.0 JSON API (and documentation),9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,3,2021-11-15T23:22:45Z,2022-03-15T20:38:56Z,,OWNER,,"The new JSON API in a stable, documented form.",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1509/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1054244712,I_kwDOBm6k_c4-1n9o,1510,Datasette 1.0 documented template context (maybe via API docs),9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,3,2021-11-15T23:23:58Z,2023-06-28T02:05:21Z,,OWNER,,Documented context plus protective unit tests. Goal is that custom templates built for 1.x will not break without a 2.x release.,107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1510/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1054246919,I_kwDOBm6k_c4-1ogH,1511,Review plugin hooks for Datasette 1.0,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,1,2021-11-15T23:26:05Z,2021-11-16T01:20:14Z,,OWNER,,I need to perform a detailed review of the plugin interface - especially the plugin hooks like [register_facet_classes()](https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/plugin_hooks.html#register-facet-classes) which I don't yet have complete confidence in.,107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1511/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1058072543,I_kwDOBm6k_c4_EOff,1518,Complete refactor of TableView and table.html template,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,45,2021-11-19T02:55:16Z,2022-03-15T18:35:49Z,,OWNER,,"Split from #878. The current `TableView` class is by far the most complex part of Datasette, and the most difficult to work on: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/0.59.2/datasette/views/table.py
In #878 I started exploring a new pattern for building views. In doing so it became clear that `TableView` is the first beast that I need to slay - if I can refactor that into something neat the pattern for building other views will emerge as a natural consequence.
I've been trying to build this as a `register_routes()` plugin, as originally suggested in #870 - though unfortunately it looks like those plugins can't replace existing Datasette default views at the moment, see #1517. [UPDATE: I was wrong about this, plugins can over-ride default views just fine]
I also know that I want to have a fully documented template context for `table.html` as a major step on the way to Datasette 1.0, see #1510.
All of this adds up to the `TableView` factor being a major project that will unblock a whole flurry of other things - so I'm going to work on that in this separate issue.",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1518/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1065429936,I_kwDOBm6k_c4_gSuw,1532,Use datasette-table Web Component to guide the design of the JSON API for 1.0,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,4,2021-11-28T20:37:18Z,2022-03-16T20:13:34Z,,OWNER,,"I realized that one of the reasons I'm having trouble committing to nailing down the JSON API for 1.0 is that I don't use it much myself - I use the `?_shape=array` one quite often, but I don't have any projects that are using the default, more fully-featured API.
As an experiment I built a Web Component for embedding Datasette tables on pages - https://github.com/simonw/datasette-table - and I think it's actually going to be a really useful tool for helping me dog food the v1.0 API design.",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1532/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1077620955,I_kwDOBm6k_c5AOzDb,1549,Redesign CSV export to improve usability,536941,fgregg,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,5,2021-12-11T19:02:12Z,2022-04-04T11:17:13Z,,CONTRIBUTOR,,"*Original title: Set content type for CSV so that browsers will attempt to download instead opening in the browser*
Right now, if the user clicks on the CSV related to a table or a query, the response header for the content type is
""content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8""
Most browsers will try to open a file with this content-type in the browser.
This is not what most people want to do, and lots of folks don't know that if they want to download the CSV and open it in the a spreadsheet program they next need to save the page through their browser.
It would be great if the response header could be something like
```
'Content-type: text/csv');
'Content-disposition: attachment;filename=MyVerySpecial.csv');
```
which would lead browsers to open a download dialog.
",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1549/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1082584499,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Ahu2z,1558,Redesign `facet_results` JSON structure prior to Datasette 1.0,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,3,2021-12-16T19:45:10Z,2023-01-09T15:31:17Z,,OWNER,,"> Decision: as an initial fix I'm going to de-duplicate those keys by using `tags__array` etc - with a `_2` on the end if that key is already used.
>
> I'll open a separate issue to redesign this better for Datasette 1.0.
_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/625#issuecomment-996130862_",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1558/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1125576543,I_kwDOBm6k_c5DFu9f,1630,Review datasette.utils and decide which functions should be documented for 1.0,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,0,2022-02-07T06:39:52Z,2022-02-07T06:39:52Z,,OWNER,,"Follows:
- #1176",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1630/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1131295060,I_kwDOBm6k_c5DbjFU,1634,Update Dockerfile generated by `datasette publish`,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,4,2022-02-11T00:07:26Z,2022-03-11T17:38:08Z,,OWNER,,"The generated `Dockerfile` currently looks something like this:
```Dockerfile
FROM python:3.8
COPY . /app
WORKDIR /app
ENV DATASETTE_SECRET 'edab49cbc5d5f6f33238f54852037e3fee710821960b73edd2ce743454182ae2'
RUN pip install -U datasette datasette-auth-passwords datasette-tiddlywiki datasette-graphql
RUN datasette inspect fixtures.db other.db --inspect-file inspect-data.json
ENV PORT 8080
EXPOSE 8080
CMD datasette serve --host 0.0.0.0 -i fixtures.db -i other.db --cors --inspect-file inspect-data.json --metadata metadata.json --create --port $PORT /data/*.db
```
This is still on Python 3.8, and it generates a pretty large image compared to the `Dockerfile` used for https://hub.docker.com/datasetteproject/datasette - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/0.60.2/Dockerfile
Here's the code that generates it: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/7d24fd405f3c60e4c852c5d746c91aa2ba23cf5b/datasette/utils/__init__.py#L389-L400",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1634/reactions"", ""total_count"": 2, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 2, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1154399841,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Ezr5h,1645,"Sensible `cache-control` headers for static assets, including those served by plugins",697092,curiousleo,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,4,2022-02-28T18:12:03Z,2022-03-08T02:59:29Z,,NONE,,"## What I'm seeing
With `default_cache_ttl = 86400`, I see the following:
A table view returns `Cache-control: max-age=86400`:
A static asset returns no `Cache-control` header:
## What I expected to see
I expected the static asset to return a `Cache-control` header indicating that this response can be cached.
## Why this matters
I'm productionising a Datasette deployment right now and was looking into putting it behind a Varnish instance. I was surprised to see requests for static assets being served from Datasette rather than Varnish, this is what led me to look more closely at the response headers.
While Datasette serves those static assets pretty quickly, I don't see why Datasette should serve them. By their nature, static assets like images and JS files are very cacheable, so it should be easy to serve them from a cache like Varnish.
(Note that Varnish can easily be configured to override this header, enabling caching for static assets. But it would be better if this override was not necessary.)
## Discussion
It seems clear to me that serving static assets without a `Cache-control` header is not ideal.
I see two options here:
A. Static assets use the same logic as table / SQL views to set the `Cache-control` header based on `default_cache_ttl`.
B. An additional setting for static assets is introduced (`default_static_cache_ttl`, say).",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1645/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1174697144,I_kwDOBm6k_c5GBHS4,1672,Refactor CSV handling code out of DataView,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,1,2022-03-20T21:47:00Z,2022-03-20T21:52:39Z,,OWNER,,"> I think the way to get rid of most of the remaining complexity in `DataView` is to refactor how CSV stuff works - pulling it in line with other export factors and extracting the streaming mechanism. Opening a fresh issue for that.
_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1660#issuecomment-1073355032_",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1672/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1174717287,I_kwDOBm6k_c5GBMNn,1674,Tweak design of /.json,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,1,2022-03-20T22:58:01Z,2022-03-20T22:58:40Z,,OWNER,,"https://latest.datasette.io/.json
Currently:
```json
{
""_memory"": {
""name"": ""_memory"",
""hash"": null,
""color"": ""a6c7b9"",
""path"": ""/_memory"",
""tables_and_views_truncated"": [],
""tables_and_views_more"": false,
""tables_count"": 0,
""table_rows_sum"": 0,
""show_table_row_counts"": false,
""hidden_table_rows_sum"": 0,
""hidden_tables_count"": 0,
""views_count"": 0,
""private"": false
},
""fixtures"": {
""name"": ""fixtures"",
""hash"": ""645005884646eb941c89997fbd1c0dd6be517cb1b493df9816ae497c0c5afbaa"",
""color"": ""645005"",
""path"": ""/fixtures"",
""tables_and_views_truncated"": [
{
""name"": ""compound_three_primary_keys"",
""columns"": [
""pk1"",
""pk2"",
""pk3"",
""content""
],
""primary_keys"": [
""pk1"",
""pk2"",
""pk3""
],
""count"": 1001,
""hidden"": false,
""fts_table"": null,
""num_relationships_for_sorting"": 0,
""private"": false
},
```
As-of this issue the `""path""` key is confusing, it doesn't match what https://latest.datasette.io/-/databases returns:
- #1668",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1674/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1175690070,I_kwDOBm6k_c5GE5tW,1676,"Reconsider ensure_permissions() logic, can it be less confusing?",9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,3,2022-03-21T17:14:57Z,2022-12-02T01:23:40Z,,OWNER,,"> Updated documentation: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/e627510b760198ccedba9e5af47a771e847785c9/docs/internals.rst#await-ensure_permissionsactor-permissions
>
>> This method allows multiple permissions to be checked at onced. It raises a `datasette.Forbidden` exception if any of the checks are denied before one of them is explicitly granted.
>>
>> This is useful when you need to check multiple permissions at once. For example, an actor should be able to view a table if either one of the following checks returns `True` or not a single one of them returns `False`:
>
> That's pretty hard to understand! I'm going to open a separate issue to reconsider if this is a useful enough abstraction given how confusing it is.
_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1675#issuecomment-1074177827_",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1676/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1175894898,I_kwDOBm6k_c5GFrty,1680,Consider simplifying permissions for 1.0,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,0,2022-03-21T20:17:29Z,2022-03-21T20:17:29Z,,OWNER,,"Permission checks right now can express one of three opinions:
- `False` means ""so not grant this permisson""
- `True` means ""grant this permission""
- `None` means ""I have no opinion""
But... there's also a concept of a ""default"" for a given permission check, which might be `False` or `True`.
I worry this is too complicated. Could this be simplified before 1.0? In particular the default concept.
See also:
- #1676 ",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1680/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1197925865,I_kwDOBm6k_c5HZuXp,1704,File PRs against incompatible plugins pinning to datasette<1.0,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,0,2022-04-08T23:15:30Z,2022-04-08T23:15:30Z,,OWNER,,"As part of the preparation for the 1.0 release, test all existing known plugins against the alpha.
For any that break, submit a PR suggesting they pin to a version <1.0 - and include a link to the documentation on how to upgrade the plugin for 1.0.",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1704/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1386854246,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Sqbdm,1822,Switch to keyword-only arguments for a bunch of internal methods,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,3,2022-09-26T23:20:38Z,2022-09-27T00:44:04Z,,OWNER,,"This is a good idea, and one that needs to happen before Datasette 1.0:
> While you are adding features, would you be future-proofing your APIs if you switched over some arguments over to keyword-only arguments or would that be too disruptive?
>
> Thinking out loud:
>
> ```
> async def render_template(
> self, templates, *, context=None, plugin_context=None, request=None, view_name=None
> ):
> ```
_Originally posted by @jefftriplett in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1817#issuecomment-1256781274_
",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1822/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1454532488,I_kwDOBm6k_c5WsmeI,1902,Document {% block crumbs %} for plugin authors,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,0,2022-11-18T06:16:30Z,2022-11-18T06:16:39Z,,OWNER,,"> For `datasette-copyable` I want to show breadcrumbs that take database/instance permissions into account, so I'm removing `{% block nav %}` entirely and replacing it with this:
>
> ```html+jinja
> {% block crumbs %}
> {{ crumbs.nav(request=request, database=database, table=table) }}
> {% endblock %}
> ```
_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1901#issuecomment-1319588163_
I should document this.",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1902/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1455928469,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Wx7SV,1903,Refactor all error classes into a datasette.exceptions module,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,2,2022-11-18T22:44:45Z,2022-11-20T22:35:01Z,,OWNER,,"While working on this issue:
- #1896
I realized that Datasette has error classes scattered around a fair bit, including some in the `datasette.utils.asgi` module for some reason.
I should clean these up.",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1903/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1456013930,I_kwDOBm6k_c5WyQJq,1906,Extract publish Heroku support to a plugin,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,0,2022-11-19T00:02:51Z,2022-11-19T00:03:10Z,,OWNER,,"> This is a strong argument for extracting the Heroku support out to a plugin - it would allow this to be fixed with a plugin release without needing to push a full release of Datasette itself.
_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1905#issuecomment-1320678715_
",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1906/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1479920517,I_kwDOBm6k_c5YNcuF,1934,Return number of ignored/replaced items from /-/insert,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,0,2022-12-06T19:01:58Z,2022-12-06T19:02:03Z,,OWNER,,"Idea from here:
- https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/516",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1934/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1483250004,I_kwDOBm6k_c5YaJlU,1936,Fix /db/table/-/upsert in the API explorer,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,2,2022-12-08T00:59:34Z,2022-12-08T01:36:02Z,,OWNER,,"Split from:
- #1931
- #1878
This is a bit tricky because the code needs to figure out what the primary keys are for an item, and whether or not `rowid` should be included.",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1936/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1487738738,I_kwDOBm6k_c5YrRdy,1942,Option for plugins to request that JSON be served on the page,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,1,2022-12-10T01:08:53Z,2022-12-10T01:11:30Z,,OWNER,,"Idea came from a conversation with @hydrosquall - what if a Datasette plugin could say ""I'd like the JSON for a page to be included in a variable on the HTML page""?
`datasette-cluster-map` already needs this - the first thing it does when the page loads is `fetch()` a JSON representation of that same data.
This idea fits with my overall goals to unify the JSON and HTML context too.
Refs:
- #1711",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1942/reactions"", ""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 1, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1529707837,I_kwDOBm6k_c5bLX09,1988,Reconsider pattern where plugins could break existing template context,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,4,2023-01-11T21:13:43Z,2023-01-11T21:25:05Z,,OWNER,,"> I hadn't run into an issue with plugins like `datasette-template-sql` interfering with the existing context for other features before! Definitely not a good thing.
_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette-write/issues/6#issuecomment-1379490596_
",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1988/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1558644003,I_kwDOBm6k_c5c5wUj,2006,Teach `datasette publish` to pin to `datasette<1.0` in a 0.x release,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,2,2023-01-26T19:17:40Z,2023-01-26T19:20:53Z,,OWNER,,"I just realized that when I ship Datasette 1.0 there may be automated deployments out there which could deploy the 1.0 version by accident, potentially breaking any customizations that aren't compatible with the 1.0 changes.
I can hopefully help avoid that by shipping one last entry in the `0.x` series that ensures `datasette publish` pins to `<1.0` when it installs Datasette itself.",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2006/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1563264257,I_kwDOBm6k_c5dLYUB,2010,Row page should default to card view,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,1,2023-01-30T21:49:37Z,2023-01-30T21:52:06Z,,OWNER,,"Datasette currently uses the same table layout on the row pages as it does on the table pages:
https://datasette.io/content/pypi_packages?_sort=name&name__exact=datasette-column-inspect
https://datasette.io/content/pypi_packages/datasette-column-inspect
If you shrink down to mobile width you get this instead, on both of those pages:
I think that view, which I think of as the ""card view"", is plain better if you're looking at just a single row - and it (or a variant of it) should be the default presentation on the row page.
",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2010/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1571207083,I_kwDOBm6k_c5dprer,2016,Database metadata fields like description are not available in the index page template's context,9993,palewire,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,1,2023-02-05T02:25:53Z,2023-02-05T22:56:43Z,,NONE,,"When looping through `databases` in the index.html template, I'd like to print the description of each database alongside its name. But it appears that isn't passed in from the view, unless I'm missing it. It would be great to have that.",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2016/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1615692818,I_kwDOBm6k_c5gTYQS,2035,Potential feature: special support for `?a=1&a=2` on the query page,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,14,2023-03-08T18:05:03Z,2023-03-31T16:09:08Z,,OWNER,,"From a discussion on Discord: https://discord.com/channels/823971286308356157/996877076982415491/1082789517062320138
The key idea is to make it easier for people to implement `where id in (...)` that's populated from query string arguments.
What if you could add `?id=11&id=32&id=62` to the URL and have that made available as a list that can be used in the query?",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2035/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1641013220,I_kwDOBm6k_c5hz9_k,2045,First column on a view page has no facet option in cog menu,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,0,2023-03-26T18:02:47Z,2023-03-26T18:02:48Z,,OWNER,,"e.g. first column on this page - cog menu has no option to facet.
https://datasette.io/content/tools
",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2045/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1838469176,I_kwDOBm6k_c5tlNA4,2127,Context base class to support documenting the context,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,3,2023-08-07T00:01:02Z,2023-08-10T01:30:25Z,,OWNER,,"This idea first came up here:
- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2112#issuecomment-1652751140
If `datasette.render_template(...)` takes an optional `Context` subclass as an alternative to a context dictionary, I could then use dataclasses to define the context made available to specific templates - which then gives me something I can use to help document what they are.
Also refs:
- https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1510",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2127/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1840324765,I_kwDOBm6k_c5tsSCd,2129,CSV ?sql= should indicate errors,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,1,2023-08-07T23:13:04Z,2023-08-08T02:02:21Z,,OWNER,,"> https://latest.datasette.io/_memory.csv?sql=select+blah is a blank page right now:
```bash
curl -I 'https://latest.datasette.io/_memory.csv?sql=select+blah'
```
```
HTTP/2 200
access-control-allow-origin: *
access-control-allow-headers: Authorization, Content-Type
access-control-expose-headers: Link
access-control-allow-methods: GET, POST, HEAD, OPTIONS
access-control-max-age: 3600
content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
x-databases: _memory, _internal, fixtures, fixtures2, extra_database, ephemeral
date: Mon, 07 Aug 2023 23:12:15 GMT
server: Google Frontend
```
_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2118#issuecomment-1668688947_",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2129/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1840417903,I_kwDOBm6k_c5tsoxv,2131,Refactor code that supports templates_considered comment,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,1,2023-08-08T01:28:36Z,2023-08-09T15:27:41Z,,OWNER,,"I ended up duplicating it here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/7532feb424b1dce614351e21b2265c04f9669fe2/datasette/views/database.py#L164-L167
I think it should move to `datasette.render_template()` - and maybe have a renamed template variable too.",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2131/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1898927976,I_kwDOBm6k_c5xL1do,2186,Mechanism for register_output_renderer hooks to access full count,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,2,2023-09-15T18:57:54Z,2023-09-15T19:27:59Z,,OWNER,,"The cause of this bug:
- https://github.com/simonw/datasette-export-notebook/issues/17
Is that `datasette-export-notebook` was consulting `data[""filtered_table_rows_count""]` in the render output plugin function in order to show the total number of rows that would be exported.
That field is no longer available by default - the `""count""` field is only available if `?_extra=count` was passed.
It would be useful if plugins like this could access the total count on demand, should they need to.",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2186/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1940346034,I_kwDOBm6k_c5zp1Sy,2199,Detailed upgrade instructions for metadata.yaml -> datasette.yaml,9599,simonw,open,0,,,3268330,Datasette 1.0,7,2023-10-12T16:21:25Z,2023-10-12T22:08:42Z,,OWNER,,"> `Exception: Datasette no longer accepts plugin configuration in --metadata. Move your ""plugins"" configuration blocks to a separate file - we suggest calling that datasette..json - and start Datasette with datasette -c datasette..json. See https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/configuration.html for more details.`
>
> I think we should link directly to documentation that tells people how to perform this upgrade.
_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2190#issuecomment-1759947021_
",107914493,datasette,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2199/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,