id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason 1175854982,I_kwDOBm6k_c5GFh-G,1679,Research: how much overhead does the n=1 time limit have?,9599,closed,0,,3268330,11,2022-03-21T19:27:46Z,2022-03-21T21:55:57Z,2022-03-21T21:55:56Z,OWNER,,"https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/1a7750eb29fd15dd2eea3b9f6e33028ce441b143/datasette/utils/__init__.py#L181-L200 ```python @contextmanager def sqlite_timelimit(conn, ms): deadline = time.perf_counter() + (ms / 1000) # n is the number of SQLite virtual machine instructions that will be # executed between each check. It's hard to know what to pick here. # After some experimentation, I've decided to go with 1000 by default and # 1 for time limits that are less than 50ms n = 1000 if ms < 50: n = 1 def handler(): if time.perf_counter() >= deadline: return 1 conn.set_progress_handler(handler, n) try: yield finally: conn.set_progress_handler(None, n) ``` How often do I set a time limit of 50 or less? How much slower does it go thanks to this code?",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1679/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1175894898,I_kwDOBm6k_c5GFrty,1680,Consider simplifying permissions for 1.0,9599,open,0,,3268330,0,2022-03-21T20:17:29Z,2022-03-21T20:17:29Z,,OWNER,,"Permission checks right now can express one of three opinions: - `False` means ""so not grant this permisson"" - `True` means ""grant this permission"" - `None` means ""I have no opinion"" But... there's also a concept of a ""default"" for a given permission check, which might be `False` or `True`. I worry this is too complicated. Could this be simplified before 1.0? In particular the default concept. See also: - #1676 ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1680/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1170144879,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Fvv5v,1660,Refactor and simplify Datasette routing and views,9599,closed,0,,3268330,8,2022-03-15T19:56:56Z,2022-03-21T19:19:12Z,2022-03-21T19:19:01Z,OWNER,,"While working on: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1657 - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439 It became very clear that the least maintainable part of Datasette at the moment is the way routing to the database, table and row views work - in particular the subclassing mechanism with BaseView and DataView, but also the complex variety of ways in which the URL routes capture different named regular expression groups.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1660/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1175715988,I_kwDOBm6k_c5GFACU,1678,Make `check_visibility()` a documented API,9599,closed,0,,3268330,1,2022-03-21T17:30:34Z,2022-03-21T19:04:03Z,2022-03-21T19:01:46Z,OWNER,,"Spotted this while working on: - #1677 https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/e627510b760198ccedba9e5af47a771e847785c9/datasette/utils/__init__.py#L1005-L1021",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1678/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1175694248,I_kwDOBm6k_c5GE6uo,1677,Remove `check_permission()` from `BaseView`,9599,closed,0,,3268330,1,2022-03-21T17:18:18Z,2022-03-21T18:45:04Z,2022-03-21T18:45:03Z,OWNER,,"Follow-on from: - #1675 Refs: - #1660",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1677/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 780153562,MDU6SXNzdWU3ODAxNTM1NjI=,1177,Ability to stream all rows as newline-delimited JSON,9599,open,0,,3268330,1,2021-01-06T07:10:48Z,2022-03-21T15:08:52Z,,OWNER,,"> Yet another use-case for this: I want to be able to stream newline-delimited JSON in order to better import into Pandas: > > pandas.read_json(""https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/compound_three_primary_keys.json?_shape=array&_nl=on"", lines=True) _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1101#issuecomment-755128038_",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1177/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,