id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason 1978023780,I_kwDOBm6k_c515j9k,2205,request.post_vars() method obliterates form keys with multiple values,9599,open,0,,8755003,3,2023-11-05T23:25:08Z,2023-11-06T04:10:34Z,,OWNER,,"https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/452a587e236ef642cbc6ae345b58767ea8420cb5/datasette/utils/asgi.py#L137-L139 In GET requests you can do `?foo=1&foo=2` - you can do the same in POST requests, but the `dict()` call here eliminates those duplicates. You can't even try calling `post_body()` and implement your own custom parsing because of: - #2204",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2205/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1846076261,I_kwDOBm6k_c5uCONl,2139,border-color: ##ff0000 bug - two hashes,9599,closed,0,,8755003,2,2023-08-11T01:22:58Z,2023-08-11T05:16:24Z,2023-08-11T05:16:24Z,OWNER,,"Spotted this on https://latest.datasette.io/extra_database ```html
```",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2139/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1844213115,I_kwDOBm6k_c5t7HV7,2138,on_success_message_sql option for writable canned queries,9599,closed,0,,8755003,2,2023-08-10T00:20:14Z,2023-08-10T00:39:40Z,2023-08-10T00:34:26Z,OWNER,,"> Or... how about if the `on_success_message` option could define a SQL query to be executed to generate that message? Maybe `on_success_message_sql`. - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/2134",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2138/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 627794879,MDU6SXNzdWU2Mjc3OTQ4Nzk=,782,Redesign default .json format,9599,closed,0,,8755003,55,2020-05-30T18:47:07Z,2023-08-10T00:07:17Z,2023-08-10T00:07:17Z,OWNER,,The default JSON just isn't right. I find myself using `?_shape=array` for almost everything I build against the API.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/782/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1843821954,I_kwDOBm6k_c5t5n2C,2137,Redesign row default JSON,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2023-08-09T18:49:11Z,2023-08-09T19:02:47Z,,OWNER,,"This URL here: https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/simple_primary_key/1.json?_extras=foreign_key_tables ```json { ""database"": ""fixtures"", ""table"": ""simple_primary_key"", ""rows"": [ { ""id"": ""1"", ""content"": ""hello"" } ], ""columns"": [ ""id"", ""content"" ], ""primary_keys"": [ ""id"" ], ""primary_key_values"": [ ""1"" ], ""units"": {}, ""foreign_key_tables"": [ { ""other_table"": ""foreign_key_references"", ""column"": ""id"", ""other_column"": ""foreign_key_with_blank_label"", ""count"": 0, ""link"": ""/fixtures/foreign_key_references?foreign_key_with_blank_label=1"" }, { ""other_table"": ""foreign_key_references"", ""column"": ""id"", ""other_column"": ""foreign_key_with_label"", ""count"": 1, ""link"": ""/fixtures/foreign_key_references?foreign_key_with_label=1"" }, { ""other_table"": ""complex_foreign_keys"", ""column"": ""id"", ""other_column"": ""f3"", ""count"": 1, ""link"": ""/fixtures/complex_foreign_keys?f3=1"" }, { ""other_table"": ""complex_foreign_keys"", ""column"": ""id"", ""other_column"": ""f2"", ""count"": 0, ""link"": ""/fixtures/complex_foreign_keys?f2=1"" }, { ""other_table"": ""complex_foreign_keys"", ""column"": ""id"", ""other_column"": ""f1"", ""count"": 1, ""link"": ""/fixtures/complex_foreign_keys?f1=1"" } ], ""query_ms"": 4.226590999678592, ""source"": ""tests/fixtures.py"", ""source_url"": ""https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/main/tests/fixtures.py"", ""license"": ""Apache License 2.0"", ""license_url"": ""https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/main/LICENSE"", ""ok"": true, ""truncated"": false } ``` That `?_extras=` should be `?_extra=` - plus the row JSON should be redesigned to fit the new default JSON representation.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2137/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1822939274,I_kwDOBm6k_c5sp9iK,2113,Implement and document extras for the new query view page,9599,open,0,,8755003,3,2023-07-26T18:24:01Z,2023-08-09T17:35:22Z,,OWNER,,- #2109 ,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2113/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1646734246,I_kwDOBm6k_c5iJyum,2049,Custom SQL queries should use new JSON ?_extra= format,9599,open,0,,8755003,4,2023-03-30T00:42:53Z,2023-04-05T23:29:27Z,,OWNER,,"Related: - #262 I've made the change to the table view, now I need the new format to work for arbitrary SQL queries too. Note that this incorporates both arbitrary SQL queries and canned queries.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2049/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1649791661,I_kwDOBm6k_c5iVdKt,2050,Row page JSON should use new ?_extra= format,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2023-03-31T17:56:53Z,2023-03-31T17:59:49Z,,OWNER,,"https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/facetable/2.json Related: - #2049 - #1709 ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2050/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1633077183,I_kwDOBm6k_c5hVse_,2041,Remove obsolete table POST code,9599,closed,0,,8755003,2,2023-03-21T01:01:40Z,2023-03-21T01:17:44Z,2023-03-21T01:17:43Z,OWNER,,"Spotted this in: - #1999 `POST /db/table` currently executes obsolete code for inserting a row - I replaced that with `/db/table/-/insert` in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/commit/6e788b49edf4f842c0817f006eb9d865778eea5e but forgot to remove the old code.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2041/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1426080014,I_kwDOBm6k_c5VAEEO,1867,/db/table/-/rename API (also allows atomic replace),9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2022-10-27T18:13:23Z,2023-01-09T15:34:12Z,,OWNER,,"> There's one catch with batched inserts: if your CLI tool fails half way through you could end up with a partially populated table - since a bunch of batches will have succeeded first. > > ... > > If people care about that kind of thing they could always push all of their inserts to a table called `_tablename` and then atomically rename that once they've uploaded all of the data (assuming I provide an atomic-rename-this-table mechanism). _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1866#issuecomment-1293893789_ ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1867/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1493471221,I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZBI_1,1949,`.json` errors should be returned as JSON,9599,open,0,,8755003,10,2022-12-13T06:14:12Z,2022-12-15T00:46:27Z,,OWNER,,"Eg the error in this issue: - #1945 ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1949/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1490576818,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Y2GWy,1943,`/-/permissions` should list available permissions,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2022-12-11T23:38:03Z,2022-12-15T00:41:37Z,,OWNER,,"> Idea: a `/-/permissions` introspection endpoint for listing registered permissions _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1939#issuecomment-1345691103_ ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1943/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1495716243,I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZJtGT,1952,Improvements to /-/create-token restrictions interface,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2022-12-14T05:22:39Z,2022-12-14T05:23:13Z,,OWNER,,"> It would be neat not to show write permissions against immutable databases too - and not hard from a performance perspective since it doesn't involve hundreds more permission checks. > > That will need permissions to grow a flag for if they need a mutable database though, which is a bigger job. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1947#issuecomment-1350414402_ Also, DO show the `_memory` database there if Datasette was started in `--crossdb` mode.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1952/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1468689139,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Ximrz,1914,Finalize design of JSON for Datasette 1.0,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2022-11-29T20:59:10Z,2022-12-13T06:15:54Z,,OWNER,,"Tracking issue. - [ ] #1709 - [ ] #1729 - [ ] #1875",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1914/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1468495358,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xh3X-,1910,Check incoming column types on various write APIs,9599,open,0,,8755003,0,2022-11-29T18:09:10Z,2022-12-13T05:29:09Z,,OWNER,,"> I do think this needs type checking - I just tried and you really can send a string to an integer column and have it work, which feels bad. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1863#issuecomment-1331089156_ ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1910/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1428630253,I_kwDOBm6k_c5VJyrt,1873,Ensure insert API has good tests for rowid and compound primark key tables,9599,open,0,,8755003,11,2022-10-30T06:22:17Z,2022-12-13T05:29:08Z,,OWNER,,"Following: - #1866 I need to design and implement various edge-cases or primary keys: - Table without an auto-incrementing primary key - Table with compound primary keys - Table with just a `rowid`",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1873/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,reopened 1430797211,I_kwDOBm6k_c5VSDub,1875,Figure out design for JSON errors (consider RFC 7807),9599,open,0,,8755003,7,2022-11-01T03:14:15Z,2022-12-13T05:29:08Z,,OWNER,,"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis/ is a brand new standard. Since I need a neat, predictable format for my JSON errors, maybe I should use this one?",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1875/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1447465004,I_kwDOBm6k_c5WRpAs,1889,Ability to create new tokens via the API,9599,open,0,,8755003,0,2022-11-14T06:21:36Z,2022-12-13T05:29:08Z,,OWNER,,"Refs: - #1850 Initially I decided that the API shouldn't be able to create new tokens at all - I don't like the idea of an API token holder creating themselves additional tokens. Then I realized that two of the API features are specifically more useful if you can generate fresh tokens via the API: - Tokes that expire after a time limit are MUCH more useful if they can be automatically generated - Likewise, tokens that are restricted to a subset of permissions (see #1855) make more sense to be generated like this, especially in conjunction with expiry times",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1889/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1216436131,I_kwDOBm6k_c5IgVej,1721,"Implement plugin hooks: `register_table_extras`, `register_row_extras`, `register_query_extras`",9599,open,0,,8755003,0,2022-04-26T20:21:49Z,2022-12-13T05:29:07Z,,OWNER,,"Designed in: - #1720 Part of: - #262 - #1709",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1721/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1219385669,I_kwDOBm6k_c5IrllF,1729,Implement ?_extra and new API design for TableView,9599,open,0,,8755003,12,2022-04-28T22:28:14Z,2022-12-13T05:29:07Z,,OWNER,,"Part of: - #262 - #1518",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1729/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1200649124,I_kwDOBm6k_c5HkHOk,1708,Datasette 1.0 alpha upcoming release notes,9599,open,0,,8755003,2,2022-04-11T22:57:12Z,2022-12-13T05:29:06Z,,OWNER,,"I'm going to try writing the release notes first, to see if that helps unblock me. # ⚠️ Any release notes in this issue are a draft, and should not be treated as the real thing ⚠️ ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1708/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1200649502,I_kwDOBm6k_c5HkHUe,1709,Redesigned JSON API with ?_extra= parameters,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2022-04-11T22:57:49Z,2022-12-13T05:29:06Z,,OWNER,,This will be the single biggest breaking change for the 1.0 release.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1709/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1200650491,I_kwDOBm6k_c5HkHj7,1711,Template context powered entirely by the JSON API format,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2022-04-11T22:59:27Z,2022-12-13T05:29:06Z,,OWNER,,Datasette 1.0 will have a stable template context. I'm going to achieve this by refactoring the templates to work only with keys returned by the API (or some of its extras) - then the API documentation will double up as template documentation.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1711/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1197926598,I_kwDOBm6k_c5HZujG,1705,How to upgrade your plugin for 1.0 documentation,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2022-04-08T23:16:47Z,2022-12-13T05:29:05Z,,OWNER,,"Among other things, needed by: - #1704",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1705/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,