id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason
1718635018,PR_kwDOCGYnMM5Q9lY4,553,Reformatted CLI examples in docs,9599,closed,0,,,2,2023-05-21T20:44:34Z,2023-05-21T20:57:27Z,2023-05-21T20:57:23Z,OWNER,simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/553,"Refs:
- #551

<!-- readthedocs-preview sqlite-utils start -->
----
:books: Documentation preview :books:: https://sqlite-utils--553.org.readthedocs.build/en/553/

<!-- readthedocs-preview sqlite-utils end -->",140912432,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/553/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0,
465327844,MDU6SXNzdWU0NjUzMjc4NDQ=,553,Potential improvements to facet-by-date,9599,open,0,,,3,2019-07-08T15:37:53Z,2019-07-08T15:41:55Z,,OWNER,,"In addition to #483 Tobias had some useful suggestions on Twitter:

https://twitter.com/rixxtr/status/1148253926476701696
> I think for date facets, it might be more meaningful to order them by date, rather than by size? Or offer both? I'm *definitely* often interested in size-over-time, so https://data.rixx.de/django_tickets/tickets?_facet_date=created#facet-created … isn't all that helpful!

Screenshot of that link:

<img width=""1092"" alt=""django_tickets__tickets__29_846_rows"" src=""https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9599/60823090-9f680100-a15b-11e9-84e9-52b9d666e90f.png"">
",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/553/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,