id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason
718521469,MDU6SXNzdWU3MTg1MjE0Njk=,1011,column name links broken in 0.50.1,649467,closed,0,,,4,2020-10-10T03:37:51Z,2020-10-10T04:09:32Z,2020-10-10T03:52:07Z,NONE,,"I just upgraded from 0.49 to 0.50.1 and found that the links on column headers are broken. 

If I inspect the source, they have a leading ""//"" (without host or port) rather than including base_url like other links on the page do. The links in the ""gears"" menu for each column do work.

 I don't have custom templates for my project. 
",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1011/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
699947574,MDU6SXNzdWU2OTk5NDc1NzQ=,963,Currently selected array facets are not correctly persisted through hidden form fields,649467,closed,0,,5818042,1,2020-09-12T01:49:17Z,2020-09-12T21:54:29Z,2020-09-12T21:54:09Z,NONE,,"Faceted search uses JSON array elements as facets rather than the arrays. However, if a search is ""Apply""ed (using the Apply button), the array itself rather than its elements used. 

To reproduce:
https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/facetable?_sort=pk&_facet=created&_facet=tags&_facet_array=tags

Press ""Apply"", which might be done when removing a filter. Notice that the ""tags"" facet values are now arrays, not array elements. It appears the ""&_facet_array=tags"" element of the query string is dropped.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/963/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
276091279,MDU6SXNzdWUyNzYwOTEyNzk=,144,apsw as alternative sqlite3 binding (for full text search),649467,closed,0,,,3,2017-11-22T14:40:39Z,2018-05-28T21:29:42Z,2018-05-28T21:29:42Z,NONE,,"Hey there,

Have you considered providing apsw support as an alternative to stock python sqlite3?  I use apsw because it keeps up with sqlite3 and is straightforward to bring in extensions like FTS5.  FTS really accelerates the kind of searching often done by web clients.

I may be able to help (it shouldn't be much code), but there are a couple of stylistic questions that come up when supporting an optional package.  Also, apsw is tricky in that it doesn't have a pypi package (author says limitations in providing options to setup.py). ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/144/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed