id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason
1824457306,I_kwDOBm6k_c5svwJa,2122,Parameters on canned queries: fixed or query-generated list?,1563881,open,0,,,0,2023-07-27T14:07:07Z,2023-07-27T14:07:07Z,,NONE,,"Hi,

currently parameters in canned queries are just text fields. It would be cool to have one of the options below. Would you accept a PR doing something in this direction? (Possibly this could even work as a plugin.)

* adding facets, which would work like facets on tables or views, giving a list of selectable options (and leaving parameters as is)
* making it possible to provide a query which returns selectable values for a parameter, e.g.
```     
calendar_entries_current_instrument:
        sql: |      
          select * from calendar_entries 
              where 
                    DTEND_UNIX > UNIXEPOCH() and
                    DTSTART_UNIX < UNIXEPOCH() + :days *24*60*60 and
                    current = 1 and
                    MACHINE = :instrument
              order by
                    DTSTART_UNIX
        params:
            days: 
              sql: ""SELECT VALUE FROM generate_series(1, 30, 1)""
              # this obviously requires the corresponding sqlite extension
            instrument:
              sql: ""SELECT DISTINCT MACHINE FROM calendar_entries""
```
* making it possible to provide a fixed list of parameters
```     
calendar_entries_current_instrument:
        sql: |      
          select * from calendar_entries 
              where 
                    DTEND_UNIX > UNIXEPOCH() and
                    DTSTART_UNIX < UNIXEPOCH() + :days *24*60*60 and
                    current = 1 and
                    MACHINE = :instrument
              order by
                    DTSTART_UNIX
        params:
            days: 
              values: [1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 20, 30]
            instrument:
              values: [supermachine, crappymachine, boringmachine]
```",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2122/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
1577548579,I_kwDOBm6k_c5eB3sj,2021,Docker images for 1.0 alphas?,1563881,open,0,,,0,2023-02-09T09:35:52Z,2023-02-09T09:35:52Z,,NONE,,"Hi,
would you consider putting 1.0alpha images on Dockerhub? 

(Also, how usable are the alphas?)",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/2021/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,