id,node_id,number,title,user,user_label,state,locked,assignee,assignee_label,milestone,milestone_label,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,repo_label,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason 1795187493,I_kwDODLZ_YM5rAGMl,12,Switch to pyproject.toml,9599,simonw,closed,0,,,,,2,2023-07-09T01:06:56Z,2023-07-09T01:19:43Z,2023-07-09T01:19:42Z,MEMBER,,First of my CLI tools to use https://til.simonwillison.net/python/pyproject,213286752,pocket-to-sqlite,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/pocket-to-sqlite/issues/12/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1246826792,I_kwDODLZ_YM5KUREo,10,"When running `auth` command, don't overwrite an existing auth.json file",11887,ashanan,closed,0,,,,,3,2022-05-24T16:42:20Z,2022-09-07T15:07:38Z,2022-08-22T16:17:19Z,NONE,,"Ran the `auth` command in the same directory I'd previously set up an auth.json file for `twitter-to-sqlite` and it was completely overwritten. Not the biggest issue, but still unexpected. Ideally, for me, the keys would just be added to the existing file, but getting a warning and a chance to back out would be a good solution as well.",213286752,pocket-to-sqlite,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/pocket-to-sqlite/issues/10/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1345452427,I_kwDODLZ_YM5QMfmL,11,"-a option is used for ""--auth"" and for ""--all""",2467,fernand0,closed,0,,,,,3,2022-08-21T10:50:48Z,2022-08-21T21:11:57Z,2022-08-21T21:11:57Z,NONE,,"I'm not sure which option is best, instead of -a -all.",213286752,pocket-to-sqlite,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/pocket-to-sqlite/issues/11/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 750141615,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTI2ODQ3ODIz,7,Fixed conflicting CLI flags,8944,tlockney,closed,0,,,,,1,2020-11-24T23:25:12Z,2022-08-21T21:11:56Z,2022-08-21T21:11:56Z,CONTRIBUTOR,dogsheep/pocket-to-sqlite/pulls/7,"The `-a` used for the auth credentials and the shortened form of the `--all` flags were in conflict on the `fetch` command. To be consistent with other `-to-sqlite` libraries in the Dogsheep ecosystem, I removed the shortened form of the `--all` flag.",213286752,pocket-to-sqlite,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/pocket-to-sqlite/issues/7/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0, 801780625,MDU6SXNzdWU4MDE3ODA2MjU=,9,SSL Error,12669260,jfeiwell,open,0,,,,,2,2021-02-05T02:12:56Z,2021-02-07T18:45:04Z,,NONE,,"Here's the error I get when running `pip install pocket-to-sqlite`: ``` Could not fetch URL https://pypi.python.org/simple/pocket-to-sqlite/: There was a problem confirming the ssl certificate: [SSL: TLSV1_ALERT_PROTOCOL_VERSION] tlsv1 alert protocol version (_ssl.c:661) - skipping Could not find a version that satisfies the requirement pocket-to-sqlite (from versions: ) No matching distribution found for pocket-to-sqlite ``` Does this require python 3? ",213286752,pocket-to-sqlite,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/pocket-to-sqlite/issues/9/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 797728929,MDU6SXNzdWU3OTc3Mjg5Mjk=,8,QUESTION: extract full text,417363,darribas,open,0,,,,,0,2021-01-31T14:50:10Z,2021-01-31T14:50:10Z,,NONE,,"This may be solved or a feature already, but I couldn't figure it out, is it possible to extract and store also full text from the saved pages? The same way that Pocket parses the text, it'd be amazing to be able to store (and thus make searchable later) the text. Thank you very much for the project, it's such an amazing idea! ",213286752,pocket-to-sqlite,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/pocket-to-sqlite/issues/8/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 629473827,MDU6SXNzdWU2Mjk0NzM4Mjc=,5,Set up a demo,26745575,harryvederci,open,0,,,,,1,2020-06-02T19:56:49Z,2020-09-01T06:18:43Z,,NONE,,"First off, thanks for open sourcing this application! This is a suggestion to increase the amount of people that would make use of it: an example in the readme file would help. Currently, users have to clone the app, install it, authorize through pocket, run a command, an then find out if this application does what they hope it does. Another possibility is to add a file `example-output.db`, containing one (mock) Pocket article. Keep up the good work!",213286752,pocket-to-sqlite,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/pocket-to-sqlite/issues/5/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 503243784,MDU6SXNzdWU1MDMyNDM3ODQ=,3,Extract images into separate tables,9599,simonw,open,0,,,,,1,2019-10-07T05:43:01Z,2020-09-01T06:17:45Z,,MEMBER,,"As already done with authors. Slightly harder because images do not have a universally unique ID. Also need to figure out what to do about there being columns for both `image` and `images`. ",213286752,pocket-to-sqlite,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/pocket-to-sqlite/issues/3/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 689848827,MDU6SXNzdWU2ODk4NDg4Mjc=,6,ISO timestamps,9599,simonw,open,0,,,,,0,2020-09-01T06:16:42Z,2020-09-01T06:16:42Z,,MEMBER,,"The `time_added`, `time_updated` and `time_read` columns currently store data like this: September 19, 2019 - 00:30:30 UTC Should use ISO instead, e.g. `2020-07-26T01:05:24+00:00`",213286752,pocket-to-sqlite,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/pocket-to-sqlite/issues/6/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 503234169,MDU6SXNzdWU1MDMyMzQxNjk=,2,Track and use the 'since' value,9599,simonw,closed,0,,,,,3,2019-10-07T05:02:59Z,2020-03-27T22:22:30Z,2020-03-27T22:22:30Z,MEMBER,,"Pocket says: > Whenever possible, you should use the since parameter, or count and and offset parameters when retrieving a user's list. After retrieving the list, you should store the current time (which is provided along with the list response) and pass that in the next request for the list. This way the server only needs to return a small set (changes since that time) instead of the user's entire list every time. At the bottom of https://getpocket.com/developer/docs/v3/retrieve",213286752,pocket-to-sqlite,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/pocket-to-sqlite/issues/2/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 503233021,MDU6SXNzdWU1MDMyMzMwMjE=,1,Use better pagination (and implement progress bar),9599,simonw,closed,0,,,,,4,2019-10-07T04:58:11Z,2020-03-27T22:13:57Z,2020-03-27T22:13:57Z,MEMBER,,"Right now we attempt to load everything at once - which caps out at 5,000 items and is really slow. We can do better by implementing pagination using count and offset.",213286752,pocket-to-sqlite,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/pocket-to-sqlite/issues/1/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 589402939,MDU6SXNzdWU1ODk0MDI5Mzk=,4,"Store authentication information as ""pocket_access_token"" etc",9599,simonw,closed,0,,,,,0,2020-03-27T20:43:22Z,2020-03-27T20:43:59Z,2020-03-27T20:43:59Z,MEMBER,,The `pocket_` prefix will mean that the same `auth.json` file can be used for other Dogsheep tools without Pocket over-riding a value set by some other tool.,213286752,pocket-to-sqlite,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/pocket-to-sqlite/issues/4/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed