id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason
423316403,MDU6SXNzdWU0MjMzMTY0MDM=,422,Figure out what to do about table counts in a mutable world,9599,closed,0,,,4,2019-03-20T15:27:15Z,2019-05-02T05:43:11Z,2019-05-02T05:43:11Z,OWNER,,"In moving away from the existing static inspect method (see #420 and #419) the biggest thing lost is full table row counts. These can be expensive against large tables, but currently Datasette runs the `count (*) from x` query once at inspection time and then reuses it for every page.

We can run those counts with a timelimit, but this means that for larger tables we won't be able to show a count at all, which is disappointing.

Is there a way we can find an approximate or lower bound count for a table?",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/422/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed