id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason
718938889,MDU6SXNzdWU3MTg5Mzg4ODk=,5,Figure out how to display images from <en-media> tags inline in Datasette,9599,open,0,,,6,2020-10-11T22:17:03Z,2020-10-16T20:16:28Z,,MEMBER,,"Relates to #1. Evernote XML looks like this:

```xml
<?xml version=""1.0""?>
<en-note>
  <div>This note includes two images.</div>
  <div>
    <b>The Python logo</b>
  </div>
  <div>
    <en-media hash=""61098c2c541de7f0a907c301dd6542da"" type=""image/svg+xml"" width=""125""/>
  </div>
  <div>
    <b>The Evernote logo</b>
  </div>
  <div>
    <en-media hash=""91bd26175acac0b2ffdb6efac199f8ca"" type=""image/svg+xml"" width=""125""/>
  </div>
</en-note>
```
That hash is the md5 we use to store resources. It should be possible to turn these into embedded image tags, especially if done in conjunction with the https://github.com/simonw/datasette-media plugin.",303218369,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/evernote-to-sqlite/issues/5/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
723499985,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTA1MDc2NDE4,5,Add fitbit-to-sqlite,4632208,open,0,,,0,2020-10-16T20:04:05Z,2020-10-16T20:04:05Z,,FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR,dogsheep/dogsheep.github.io/pulls/5,,214746582,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/dogsheep/dogsheep.github.io/issues/5/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0,
472115381,MDU6SXNzdWU0NzIxMTUzODE=,49,extracts= should support multiple-column extracts,9599,open,0,,,10,2019-07-24T07:06:41Z,2020-10-16T19:18:19Z,,OWNER,,"Lookup tables can be constructed on compound columns, but the `extracts=` option doesn't currently support that.

Right now extracts can be defined in two ways:
```python
# Extract these columns into tables with the same name:
dogs = db.table(""dogs"", extracts=[""breed"", ""most_recent_trophy""])

# Same as above but with custom table names:
dogs = db.table(""dogs"", extracts={""breed"": ""Breeds"", ""most_recent_trophy"": ""Trophies""})
```
Need some kind of syntax for much more complicated extractions, like when two columns (say ""source"" and ""source_version"") are extracted into a single table.",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/49/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,
573578548,MDU6SXNzdWU1NzM1Nzg1NDg=,89,Ability to customize columns used by extracts= feature,9599,open,0,,,3,2020-03-01T16:54:48Z,2020-10-16T19:17:50Z,,OWNER,,"@simonw any thoughts on allow extracts to specify the lookup column name? If I'm understanding the documentation right, `.lookup()` allows you to define the ""value"" column (the documentation uses name), but when you use `extracts` keyword as part of `.insert()`, `.upsert()` etc. the lookup must be done against a column named ""value"". I have an existing lookup table that I've populated with columns ""id"" and ""name"" as opposed to ""id"" and ""value"", and seems I can't use `extracts=`, unless I'm missing something...

Initial thought on how to do this would be to allow the dictionary value to be a tuple of table name column pair... so:
```
table = db.table(""trees"", extracts={""species_id"": (""Species"", ""name""})
```

I haven't dug too much into the existing code yet, but does this make sense? Worth doing?

_Originally posted by @chrishas35 in https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/46#issuecomment-592999503_",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/89/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,