id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason
570101428,MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0Mzc5MTkyMjU4,683,.execute_write() and .execute_write_fn() methods on Database,9599,closed,0,,3268330,14,2020-02-24T19:51:58Z,2020-05-30T18:40:20Z,2020-02-25T04:45:08Z,OWNER,simonw/datasette/pulls/683,"See #682

- [x] Come up with design for `.execute_write()` and `.execute_write_fn()`
- [x] Build some quick demo plugins to exercise the design
- [x] Write some unit tests
- [x] Write the documentation",107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/683/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0,
268453968,MDU6SXNzdWUyNjg0NTM5Njg=,37,Ability to serialize massive JSON without blocking event loop,9599,closed,0,,,2,2017-10-25T15:58:03Z,2020-05-30T17:29:20Z,2020-05-30T17:29:20Z,OWNER,,"We run the risk of someone attempting a select statement that returns thousands of rows and hence takes several seconds just to JSON encode the response, effectively blocking the event loop and pausing all other traffic.

The Twisted community have a solution for this, can we adapt that in some way? http://as.ynchrono.us/2010/06/asynchronous-json_18.html?m=1",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/37/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
570309546,MDU6SXNzdWU1NzAzMDk1NDY=,685,Document (and reconsider design of) Database.execute() and Database.execute_against_connection_in_thread(),9599,closed,0,,3268330,15,2020-02-25T04:49:44Z,2020-05-30T13:20:50Z,2020-05-08T17:42:18Z,OWNER,,"In #683 I started a new section of internals documentation covering the `Database` class: https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/latest/internals.html#database-class

I decided not to document `.execute()` and `.execute_against_connection_in_thread()` yet because I'm not 100% happy with their API design yet.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/685/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed
585633142,MDU6SXNzdWU1ODU2MzMxNDI=,706,"Documentation for the ""request"" object",9599,closed,0,,3268330,6,2020-03-22T02:55:50Z,2020-05-30T13:20:00Z,2020-05-27T22:31:22Z,OWNER,,"Since that object is passed to the `extra_template_vars` hooks AND the classes registered by `register_facet_classes` it should be part of the documented interface on https://datasette.readthedocs.io/en/stable/internals.html

I could also start passing it to the `register_output_renderer` callback.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/706/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed