id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason 1386734383,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Sp-Mv,1821,Release Datasette 0.63a0,9599,closed,0,,,1,2022-09-26T21:15:27Z,2022-09-26T22:06:39Z,2022-09-26T22:06:39Z,OWNER,,"> - The [prepare_jinja2_environment(env, datasette)](https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/plugin_hooks.html#plugin-hook-prepare-jinja2-environment) plugin hook now accepts an optional `datasette` argument. Hook implementations can also now return an `async` function which will be awaited automatically. ([#1809](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1809)) > - `--load-extension` option now supports entrypoints. Thanks, Alex Garcia. ([#1789](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1789)) > - New tutorial: [Cleaning data with sqlite-utils and Datasette](https://datasette.io/tutorials/clean-data). > - Facet size can now be set per-table with the new `facet_size` table metadata option. ([#1804](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1804)) > - `truncate_cells_html` setting now also affects long URLs in columns. ([#1805](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1805)) > - `Database(is_mutable=)` now defaults to `True`. ([#1808](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1808)) > - Non-JavaScript textarea now increases height to fit the SQL query. ([#1786](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1786)) > - More detailed command descriptions on the [CLI reference](https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/cli-reference.html#cli-reference) page. ([#1787](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1787)) > - Datasette no longer enforces upper bounds on its depenedencies. ([#1800](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1800)) > - Facets are now displayed with better line-breaks in long values. Thanks, Daniel Rech. ([#1794](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/1794)) > - The `settings.json` file used in [Configuration directory mode](https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/settings.html#config-dir) is now validated on startup. ([#1816](https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1816))",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1821/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1386593843,I_kwDOCGYnMM5Spb4z,494,Document how to use Just,9599,closed,0,,,2,2022-09-26T19:25:12Z,2022-09-26T19:32:36Z,2022-09-26T19:26:39Z,OWNER,,"I'm using `just` a lot know, based on this file - I should add that to https://sqlite-utils.datasette.io/en/latest/contributing.html https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/afbd2b2cba45cccb305c3d4638d18db4dd3d4bbd/Justfile#L1-L24",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/494/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1363765916,I_kwDOCGYnMM5RSWqc,483,`sqlite-utils install` command,9599,closed,0,,,2,2022-09-06T20:13:55Z,2022-09-26T19:04:43Z,2022-09-26T18:57:15Z,OWNER,,"With the addition of `--functions` in: - #471 In addition to the existing `convert` command, there are now very good reasons to want to install additional packages into the same virtual environment as `sqlite-utils` itself, to allow them to be used with those features. This isn't easy if you installed the tool with `pipx` or `brew install sqlite-utils`. Datasette solved this problem with the `datasette install` command: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/925 `sqlite-utils` could benefit from the same idea.",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/483/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1386530156,I_kwDOCGYnMM5SpMVs,492,Idea: ability to pass extra variables to `--convert` scripts,9599,open,0,,,1,2022-09-26T18:30:45Z,2022-09-26T18:33:19Z,,OWNER,,"Got this idea from this example in https://jeqo.github.io/notes/2022-09-24-ingest-logs-sqlite/ ```bash sqlite-utils insert /tmp/kafka-logs.db logs server.log.2022-09-24-21 --text --convert "" import re r = re.compile(r'^\[(?P\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2} \d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2},\d{3})\] (?P\w+) (?P(.+(\n(?\!\[).+|)+))', re.MULTILINE) def convert(text): rows = [m.groupdict() for m in r.finditer(text)] for row in rows: row.update({'server': 'localhost'}) row.update({'component': 'broker'}) return rows "" ``` And the accompanying note: > The `row.update` allows to label rows as I’m planning to ingest logs from different hosts and potentially different components. This made me think: it might be neat if you could inject additional variable values into that script with extra command-line options, to make this kind of reuse easier. Something like this: ```bash sqlite-utils insert /tmp/kafka-logs.db logs server.log.2022-09-24-21 --text --convert "" import re r = re.compile(r'^\[(?P\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2} \d{2}:\d{2}:\d{2},\d{3})\] (?P\w+) (?P(.+(\n(?\!\[).+|)+))', re.MULTILINE) def convert(text): rows = [m.groupdict() for m in r.finditer(text)] for row in rows: row.update({'server': server}) row.update({'component': component}) return rows "" --var server ""localhost"" --var component ""broker"" ```",140912432,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/492/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1217759117,I_kwDOBm6k_c5IlYeN,1727,Research: demonstrate if parallel SQL queries are worthwhile,9599,open,0,,,32,2022-04-27T18:54:21Z,2022-09-26T14:48:31Z,,OWNER,,"I added parallel SQL query execution here: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1723 My hunch is that this will take advantage of multiple cores, since Python's `sqlite3` module releases the GIL once a query is passed to SQLite. I'd really like to prove this is the case though. Just not sure how to do it! Larger question: is this performance optimization actually improving performance at all? Under what circumstances is it worthwhile?",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1727/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,