id,node_id,number,title,user,state,locked,assignee,milestone,comments,created_at,updated_at,closed_at,author_association,pull_request,body,repo,type,active_lock_reason,performed_via_github_app,reactions,draft,state_reason 1495241162,I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZH5HK,1950,"Bad ?_sort returns a 500 error, should be a 400",9599,closed,0,,,2,2022-12-13T22:08:16Z,2022-12-13T22:23:22Z,2022-12-13T22:23:22Z,OWNER,,"https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures/facetable?_sort=bad ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1950/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1468689139,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Ximrz,1914,Finalize design of JSON for Datasette 1.0,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2022-11-29T20:59:10Z,2022-12-13T06:15:54Z,,OWNER,,"Tracking issue. - [ ] #1709 - [ ] #1729 - [ ] #1875",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1914/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1468495358,I_kwDOBm6k_c5Xh3X-,1910,Check incoming column types on various write APIs,9599,open,0,,8755003,0,2022-11-29T18:09:10Z,2022-12-13T05:29:09Z,,OWNER,,"> I do think this needs type checking - I just tried and you really can send a string to an integer column and have it work, which feels bad. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1863#issuecomment-1331089156_ ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1910/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1428630253,I_kwDOBm6k_c5VJyrt,1873,Ensure insert API has good tests for rowid and compound primark key tables,9599,open,0,,8755003,11,2022-10-30T06:22:17Z,2022-12-13T05:29:08Z,,OWNER,,"Following: - #1866 I need to design and implement various edge-cases or primary keys: - Table without an auto-incrementing primary key - Table with compound primary keys - Table with just a `rowid`",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1873/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,reopened 1430797211,I_kwDOBm6k_c5VSDub,1875,Figure out design for JSON errors (consider RFC 7807),9599,open,0,,8755003,7,2022-11-01T03:14:15Z,2022-12-13T05:29:08Z,,OWNER,,"https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis/ is a brand new standard. Since I need a neat, predictable format for my JSON errors, maybe I should use this one?",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1875/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1447465004,I_kwDOBm6k_c5WRpAs,1889,Ability to create new tokens via the API,9599,open,0,,8755003,0,2022-11-14T06:21:36Z,2022-12-13T05:29:08Z,,OWNER,,"Refs: - #1850 Initially I decided that the API shouldn't be able to create new tokens at all - I don't like the idea of an API token holder creating themselves additional tokens. Then I realized that two of the API features are specifically more useful if you can generate fresh tokens via the API: - Tokes that expire after a time limit are MUCH more useful if they can be automatically generated - Likewise, tokens that are restricted to a subset of permissions (see #1855) make more sense to be generated like this, especially in conjunction with expiry times",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1889/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1216436131,I_kwDOBm6k_c5IgVej,1721,"Implement plugin hooks: `register_table_extras`, `register_row_extras`, `register_query_extras`",9599,open,0,,8755003,0,2022-04-26T20:21:49Z,2022-12-13T05:29:07Z,,OWNER,,"Designed in: - #1720 Part of: - #262 - #1709",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1721/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1219385669,I_kwDOBm6k_c5IrllF,1729,Implement ?_extra and new API design for TableView,9599,open,0,,8755003,12,2022-04-28T22:28:14Z,2022-12-13T05:29:07Z,,OWNER,,"Part of: - #262 - #1518",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1729/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1200649124,I_kwDOBm6k_c5HkHOk,1708,Datasette 1.0 alpha upcoming release notes,9599,open,0,,8755003,2,2022-04-11T22:57:12Z,2022-12-13T05:29:06Z,,OWNER,,"I'm going to try writing the release notes first, to see if that helps unblock me. # ⚠️ Any release notes in this issue are a draft, and should not be treated as the real thing ⚠️ ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1708/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1200649502,I_kwDOBm6k_c5HkHUe,1709,Redesigned JSON API with ?_extra= parameters,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2022-04-11T22:57:49Z,2022-12-13T05:29:06Z,,OWNER,,This will be the single biggest breaking change for the 1.0 release.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1709/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1200650491,I_kwDOBm6k_c5HkHj7,1711,Template context powered entirely by the JSON API format,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2022-04-11T22:59:27Z,2022-12-13T05:29:06Z,,OWNER,,Datasette 1.0 will have a stable template context. I'm going to achieve this by refactoring the templates to work only with keys returned by the API (or some of its extras) - then the API documentation will double up as template documentation.,107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1711/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1197926598,I_kwDOBm6k_c5HZujG,1705,How to upgrade your plugin for 1.0 documentation,9599,open,0,,8755003,1,2022-04-08T23:16:47Z,2022-12-13T05:29:05Z,,OWNER,,"Among other things, needed by: - #1704",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1705/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1485488236,PR_kwDOBm6k_c5E1iJG,1938,"""permissions"" blocks in metadata.json/yaml",9599,closed,0,,8711695,3,2022-12-08T22:07:36Z,2022-12-13T05:23:18Z,2022-12-13T05:23:18Z,OWNER,simonw/datasette/pulls/1938,"Refs #1636 - [x] Documentation - [ ] Implementation - [ ] Validate metadata to check there are no nonsensical permissions (like `debug-menu` set at the table level) - [ ] Tests ---- :books: Documentation preview :books:: https://datasette--1938.org.readthedocs.build/en/1938/ ",107914493,pull,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1938/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",0, 1493404423,I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZA4sH,1948,500 error on permission debug page when testing actors with _r,9599,open,0,,,1,2022-12-13T05:22:03Z,2022-12-13T05:22:19Z,,OWNER,," The 500 error is silent unless you are looking at the DevTools network pane. ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1948/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",, 1493339206,I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZAoxG,1946,`datasette --get` mechanism for sending tokens,9599,closed,0,,8711695,2,2022-12-13T04:25:05Z,2022-12-13T04:36:57Z,2022-12-13T04:36:57Z,OWNER,,"> For the tests for `datasette create-token` it would be useful if `datasette --get` had a mechanism for sending an `Authorization: Bearer X` header. _Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1855#issuecomment-1347731288_ ",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1946/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1493306655,I_kwDOBm6k_c5ZAg0f,1945,`view-instance` should not be checked for /-/actor.json,9599,closed,0,,8711695,0,2022-12-13T04:01:46Z,2022-12-13T04:11:56Z,2022-12-13T04:11:56Z,OWNER,,"Spotted this while testing: - #1855 ``` export TOKEN=$(datasette create-token root --secret s -a foo) curl -H ""Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN"" http://localhost:8002/-/actor.json ``` Returned a Forbidden error (and not in JSON either).",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1945/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1138008042,I_kwDOBm6k_c5D1J_q,1636,"""permissions"" propery in metadata for configuring arbitrary permissions",9599,closed,0,,8711695,14,2022-02-15T00:25:59Z,2022-12-13T02:40:50Z,2022-12-13T02:40:50Z,OWNER,,"The `""allow""` block mechanism can already be used to configure various default permissions. When adding permissions to `datasette-tiddlywiki` I realized it would be good to be able to configure arbitrary permissions such as `edit-tiddlywiki` there too.",107914493,issue,,,"{""url"": ""https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1636/reactions"", ""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,completed 1485757511,I_kwDOBm6k_c5YjtxH,1939,register_permissions(datasette) plugin hook,9599,closed,0,,8711695,20,2022-12-09T01:33:25Z,2022-12-13T02:07:50Z,2022-12-13T02:05:56Z,OWNER,,"A plugin hook that adds more named permissions to the list which is initially populated here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/e539c1c024bc62d88df91d9107cbe37e7f0fe55f/datasette/permissions.py#L1-L19 Originally imagined this hook in this comment: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1881#issuecomment-1301639370 I need this for a few reasons: - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1636 - Needs it in order to validate that permissions defined in `metadata.json` are set in the right place (don't set an instance permissions at table level for example) - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1855 - Needs it to be able to register additional abbreviations for use in signed cookies - And for validation when you use `datasette create-token` and pass in extra permissions - The https://latest.datasette.io/-/permissions debug interface needs it to add extra debug options to the `