{"id": 743384829, "node_id": "MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTIxMjg3OTk0", "number": 203, "title": "changes to allow for compound foreign keys", "user": {"value": 1049910, "label": "drkane"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 7, "created_at": "2020-11-16T00:30:10Z", "updated_at": "2023-01-25T18:47:18Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR", "pull_request": "simonw/sqlite-utils/pulls/203", "body": "Add support for compound foreign keys, as per issue #117 \r\n\r\nNot sure if this is the right approach. In particular I'm unsure about:\r\n\r\n - the new `ForeignKey` class, which replaces the namedtuple in order to ensure that `column` and `other_column` are forced into tuples. The class does the job, but doesn't feel very elegant.\r\n - I haven't rewritten `guess_foreign_table` to take account of multiple columns, so it just checks for the first column in the foreign key definition. This isn't ideal.\r\n - I haven't added any ability to the CLI to add compound foreign keys, it's only in the python API at the moment.\r\n\r\nThe PR also contains a minor related change that columns and tables are always quoted in foreign key definitions.", "repo": {"value": 140912432, "label": "sqlite-utils"}, "type": "pull", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/sqlite-utils/issues/203/reactions\", \"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 1, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": 0, "state_reason": null}