{"id": 1102637351, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5BuOkn", "number": 1598, "title": "Replace update-docs-help.py script with cog", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-01-14T00:33:27Z", "updated_at": "2022-01-14T00:47:57Z", "closed_at": "2022-01-14T00:47:57Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I introduced `cog` in #1594 - I can use this to replace the older `update-docs-help.py` mechanism:\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/76d66d5b2bf10249c0beaac0999b93ac8d757f48/tests/test_docs.py#L36-L53", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1598/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"} {"id": 1102966378, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Bve5q", "number": 1599, "title": "Add architecture documentation", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-01-14T04:55:38Z", "updated_at": "2022-01-14T04:56:03Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Inspired by https://matklad.github.io/2021/02/06/ARCHITECTURE.md.html\r\n\r\nGood example: https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/blob/d7c99931d05e3723d878bea5dc26766791fa4e69/docs/dev/architecture.md", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1599/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 1121121305, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5C0vQZ", "number": 1618, "title": "Reconsider policy on blocking queries containing the string \"pragma\"", "user": {"value": 770231, "label": "strada"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 6, "created_at": "2022-02-01T19:39:46Z", "updated_at": "2022-02-02T19:42:03Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "NONE", "pull_request": null, "body": "First of all, thanks for creating this cool project, and also supporting publishing to various hosting services out of the box.\r\n\r\nWhile testing out, I noticed legitimate queries such as \r\n```\r\nselect * from books where title like 'Pragmatic%'\r\n```\r\nor\r\n```\r\nselect * from books where title = 'The Pragmatic Programmer'\r\n```\r\nare blocked, due to the regular expression check here:\r\nhttps://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/main/datasette/utils/__init__.py#L185\r\n\r\nExample as seen from a Datasette instance:\r\nhttps://fivethirtyeight.datasettes.com/polls?sql=select+*+from+books+where+title+like+%27Pragmatic%25%27%0D%0A\r\n\r\nI'd propose a regular expression like \r\n```\r\nre.compile(f\"pragma_(?!({'|'.join(allowed_pragmas)}))\"),\r\n```\r\ninstead of\r\n```\r\nre.compile(f\"pragma(?!_({'|'.join(allowed_pragmas)}))\"),\r\n```\r\n\r\nI can create a pull request with this change, unless the maintainers think it would allow unwanted queries to be executed.\r\n", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1618/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 1121583414, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5C2gE2", "number": 1619, "title": "JSON link on row page is 404 if base_url setting is used", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 5, "created_at": "2022-02-02T07:09:53Z", "updated_at": "2023-03-24T15:38:04Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "On my local environment:\r\n\r\n datasette fixtures.db -p 3344 --setting base_url /foo/bar/\r\n\r\nThen hit http://127.0.0.1:3344/foo/bar/fixtures/table%2Fwith%2Fslashes.csv/3\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nBut... that `json` link goes here, which is a 404:\r\n\r\nhttp://127.0.0.1:3344/foo/bar/foo/bar/fixtures/table%2Fwith%2Fslashes.csv/3?_format=json", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1619/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 1121618041, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5C2oh5", "number": 1620, "title": "Link: rel=\"alternate\" to JSON for queries too", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2022-02-02T08:02:42Z", "updated_at": "2022-02-02T21:53:02Z", "closed_at": "2022-02-02T21:33:00Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Following:\r\n- #1533\r\n\r\nI implemented it for tables and rows but I should have done queries as well.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1620/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"} {"id": 1122413719, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5C5qyX", "number": 1621, "title": "Test against Python 3.11 dev version", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-02-02T21:38:57Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-19T04:04:49Z", "closed_at": "2022-02-02T21:58:54Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "To avoid another surprise like we got with 3.10: https://simonwillison.net/2021/Oct/9/finding-and-reporting-a-bug/\r\n\r\nFrom a quick GitHub code search it looks like `3.11-dev` should work: https://cs.github.com/urllib3/urllib3/blob/7bec77e81aa0a194c98381053225813f5347c9d2/.github/workflows/ci.yml#L60", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1621/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"} {"id": 1122416919, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5C5rkX", "number": 1623, "title": "/-/patterns returns link: alternate JSON header to 404", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2022-02-02T21:42:49Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-19T04:04:49Z", "closed_at": "2022-02-02T21:48:56Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Bug from:\r\n- #1620\r\n\r\n```\r\n% curl -s -I 'https://latest.datasette.io/-/patterns' | grep link\r\nlink: https://latest.datasette.io/-/patterns.json; rel=\"alternate\"; type=\"application/json+datasette\"\r\n```", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1623/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"} {"id": 1122427321, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5C5uG5", "number": 1624, "title": "Index page `/` has no CORS headers", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2022-02-02T21:56:10Z", "updated_at": "2022-09-28T16:54:22Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Compare the following:\r\n```\r\n% curl -I 'https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures'\r\nHTTP/1.1 200 OK\r\nlink: https://latest.datasette.io/fixtures.json; rel=\"alternate\"; type=\"application/json+datasette\"\r\ncache-control: max-age=5\r\nreferrer-policy: no-referrer\r\naccess-control-allow-origin: *\r\naccess-control-allow-headers: Authorization\r\naccess-control-expose-headers: Link\r\ncontent-type: text/html; charset=utf-8\r\nx-databases: _memory, _internal, fixtures, extra_database\r\nDate: Wed, 02 Feb 2022 21:55:49 GMT\r\nServer: Google Frontend\r\nTransfer-Encoding: chunked\r\n\r\n% curl -I 'https://latest.datasette.io/' \r\nHTTP/1.1 200 OK\r\nlink: https://latest.datasette.io/.json; rel=\"alternate\"; type=\"application/json+datasette\"\r\ncontent-type: text/html; charset=utf-8\r\nx-databases: _memory, _internal, fixtures, extra_database\r\nDate: Wed, 02 Feb 2022 21:55:52 GMT\r\nServer: Google Frontend\r\nTransfer-Encoding: chunked\r\n```", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1624/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 1122450452, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5C5zwU", "number": 1625, "title": "Try running tests against macOS and Windows in addition to Ubuntu", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-02-02T22:25:57Z", "updated_at": "2022-02-02T22:25:57Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I already do this for `sqlite-utils`: https://github.com/simonw/sqlite-utils/blob/3.22.1/.github/workflows/test.yml\r\n\r\nRelated:\r\n- #1617\r\n- #1545", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1625/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 1122557010, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5C6NxS", "number": 1627, "title": "Get the tests passing against Windows", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-02-03T01:23:06Z", "updated_at": "2022-02-03T01:23:32Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "> OK, the tests do NOT pass against Windows! https://github.com/simonw/datasette/runs/5044105941\r\n>\r\n> \r\n\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1626#issuecomment-1028515161_", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1627/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 1108300685, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5CD1ON", "number": 1604, "title": "Option to assign a domain/subdomain using `datasette publish cloudrun`", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-01-19T16:21:17Z", "updated_at": "2022-01-19T16:23:54Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Looks like this API should be able to do that: https://twitter.com/steren/status/1483835859191304192 - https://cloud.google.com/run/docs/reference/rest/v1/namespaces.domainmappings/create", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1604/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 1108235694, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5CDlWu", "number": 1603, "title": "A proper favicon", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 19, "created_at": "2022-01-19T15:24:55Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-19T04:04:49Z", "closed_at": "2022-01-20T06:07:31Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Tips here: https://adamj.eu/tech/2022/01/18/how-to-add-a-favicon-to-your-django-site/ - I think a PNG served at `/favicon.ico` is the best option, since safari doesn't support SVG yet.\r\n\r\nRelevant code: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/cb29119db9115b1f40de2fb45263ed77e3bfbb3e/datasette/app.py#L182-L183\r\n\r\nI can reuse the icon for https://datasette.io/desktop", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1603/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"} {"id": 1108846067, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5CF6Xz", "number": 1606, "title": "Tests failing against Python 3.6", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2022-01-20T04:22:44Z", "updated_at": "2022-01-20T04:36:42Z", "closed_at": "2022-01-20T04:36:42Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "https://github.com/simonw/datasette/runs/4877484366\r\n\r\n```\r\nE File \"/opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.6.15/x64/lib/python3.6/site-packages/uvicorn/server.py\", line 67, in run\r\nE return asyncio.run(self.serve(sockets=sockets))\r\nE AttributeError: module 'asyncio' has no attribute 'run'\r\n```\r\nI think this may mean `uvicorn` has dropped support for Python 3.6.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1606/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"} {"id": 1108671952, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5CFP3Q", "number": 1605, "title": "Scripted exports", "user": {"value": 25778, "label": "eyeseast"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 10, "created_at": "2022-01-19T23:45:55Z", "updated_at": "2022-11-30T15:06:38Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "pull_request": null, "body": "Posting this while I'm thinking about it: I mentioned at the end of [this thread](https://twitter.com/eyeseast/status/1483893011658551299) that I'm usually doing `datasette --get` to export canned queries.\r\n\r\nI used to use a tool called [datafreeze](https://github.com/pudo/datafreeze) to do scripted exports, but that project looks dead now. The ergonomics of it are pretty nice, though, and the `Freezefile.yml` structure is actually not too far from Datasette's canned queries.\r\n\r\nThis is related to the idea for `datasette query` (#1356) but I think it's a distinct feature. It's most likely a plugin, but I want to raise it here because it's probably something other people have thought about.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1605/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 1109884720, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5CJ38w", "number": 1609, "title": "Ensure \"pip install datasette\" still works with Python 3.6", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 12, "created_at": "2022-01-21T00:08:10Z", "updated_at": "2022-01-24T19:20:09Z", "closed_at": "2022-01-21T02:24:13Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "## Original title: Can I keep \"pip install datasette\" working on Python 3.6?\r\n\r\nI dropped support for 3.6 in:\r\n- #1577\r\n\r\nI'm getting reports that `pip3 install datasette` throws an error on that Python, even though I haven't made that new release yet - presumably due to lack of pinning of Uvicorn: https://twitter.com/ldodds/status/1484289475195080706\r\n\r\nIs it possible to get `pip` on that version of Python to install the highest possible version of the packages that are still known to support Python 3.6?\r\n\r\nIf so, how?", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1609/reactions\", \"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"} {"id": 1109783030, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5CJfH2", "number": 1607, "title": "More detailed information about installed SpatiaLite version", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2022-01-20T21:28:03Z", "updated_at": "2022-02-09T06:42:02Z", "closed_at": "2022-02-09T06:32:28Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "https://www.gaia-gis.it/gaia-sins/spatialite-sql-5.0.0.html#version has a whole bunch of interesting functions for things like `freexl_version()` and `geos_version()` and `HasMathSQL()` and suchlike.\r\n\r\nThese could be shown on the `/-/versions` page.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1607/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"} {"id": 1109808154, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5CJlQa", "number": 1608, "title": "Documentation should clarify /stable/ vs /latest/", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 15, "created_at": "2022-01-20T22:02:59Z", "updated_at": "2023-03-26T23:41:12Z", "closed_at": "2022-01-20T22:53:17Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "It's not currently clear what the difference between https://docs.datasette.io/en/latest/ and https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/ is - I should fix that.\r\n\r\nOn Twitter: https://twitter.com/simonw/status/1484285006243528705", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1608/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"} {"id": 1113384383, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5CXOW_", "number": 1611, "title": "Avoid ever running count(*) against SpatiaLite KNN table", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-01-25T03:32:54Z", "updated_at": "2022-02-02T06:45:47Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Got this in a trace:\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nLooks like running `count(*)` against KNN took 83s! It ignored the time limit. And still only returned a count of 0.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1611/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 1114147905, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5CaIxB", "number": 1612, "title": "Move canned queries closer to the SQL input area", "user": {"value": 639012, "label": "jsfenfen"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 5, "created_at": "2022-01-25T17:06:39Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-19T04:04:49Z", "closed_at": "2022-01-25T18:34:21Z", "author_association": "CONTRIBUTOR", "pull_request": null, "body": "*Original title: Consider placing example queries above the sql input?*\r\n\r\nHi! Have been enjoying deploying ad hoc datasettes for collaborators to pick over! \r\n\r\nI keep finding myself manually \"fixing\" the database.html template so that the \"example queries\" (canned queries) appear directly *over* the sql box? So they are sorta more a suggestion for collaborators who aren't inclined to write their own queries? \r\n\r\nMy sense is any time I go to the trouble of writing canned queries my users should see 'em? \r\n\r\n(( I have also considered a client-side reactive-ish option where selecting a query just places the raw SQL in the box and doesn't execute it, but this seems to end up being an inconvenience, rather than a teaching tool. )) \r\n\r\n", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1612/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"} {"id": 1114628238, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Cb-CO", "number": 1613, "title": "Improvements to help make Datasette a better tool for learning SQL", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 5, "created_at": "2022-01-26T04:56:07Z", "updated_at": "2022-01-26T16:41:46Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Tracking issue for the general goal of making Datasette a better tool for learning SQL.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1613/reactions\", \"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 1115435536, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5CfDIQ", "number": 1614, "title": "Try again with SQLite codemirror support", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-01-26T20:05:20Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-23T21:27:10Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I tried and failed to implement autocomplete a while ago. Relevant code:\r\n\r\nhttps://github.com/codemirror/legacy-modes/blob/8f36abca5f55024258cd23d9cfb0203d8d244f0d/mode/sql.js#L335\r\n\r\nSounds like upgrading to CodeMirror 6 ASAP would be worthwhile since it has better accessibility and touch screen support: https://codemirror.net/6/", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1614/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 1117132741, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5ClhfF", "number": 1615, "title": "Potential simplified publishing mechanism", "user": {"value": 369053, "label": "aidansteele"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2022-01-28T08:34:50Z", "updated_at": "2022-02-02T07:34:21Z", "closed_at": "2022-02-02T07:34:17Z", "author_association": "NONE", "pull_request": null, "body": "Hi,\r\n\r\nForewarning: this idea is one I've only been thinking about for a while and it's not fully fleshed-out yet.\r\n\r\nI love Datasette and what it stands for. I was thinking about how we could make it accessible to more people, especially those without access to credit cards required for a lot of hosting options. Or they might not feel comfortable signing up for said services.\r\n\r\nSo I was thinking I might create a service that hosts Datasette instances for folks. I'd probably stick it on AWS Lambda and limit requests to something like n/month to avoid bankrupting myself. If I did build such a hypothetical service, I was thinking I would rely on GitHub Actions to do the heavy lifting. \r\n\r\nE.g. user `johndoe` creates a repo `my-animals` with a couple of files: `dogs.csv`, `cats.csv` and the following GitHub Actions workflow:\r\n\r\n```yaml\r\n# .github/workflows/push.yml\r\non:\r\n push\r\n\r\n# this allows the publish action to use OIDC to authenticate johndoe/my-animals\r\npermissions:\r\n id-token: write\r\n contents: read\r\n\r\njobs:\r\n publish:\r\n runs-on: ubuntu-latest\r\n steps:\r\n - uses: actions/setup-python@v2\r\n\r\n - run: pip install sqlite-utils\r\n\r\n - uses: actions/checkout@v2\r\n\r\n - run: |\r\n set -eux\r\n \r\n sqlite-utils create-database animals.db \r\n sqlite-utils insert animals.db dogs dogs.csv --csv \r\n sqlite-utils insert animals.db cats cats.csv --csv\r\n\r\n - uses: datasette-hub/publish@v1\r\n with:\r\n db: animals.db\r\n metadata: meta.yml\r\n\r\n # this step is helpful for debugging why the\r\n # generated sqlite db was rejected\r\n - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v2\r\n if: failure()\r\n with:\r\n path: animals.db\r\n retention-days: 1\r\n```\r\n\r\nThis would then cause a Datasette instance to be available at `https://johndoe-my-animals.datasette-hub.test/`. It feels like this could significantly reduce the friction to someone being able to go from data set to Datasette.\r\n\r\nWhat do you think? Does this address a real need? Or am I perhaps misunderstanding the main friction points? As a bonus: it feels like this would pair well with [git scraping](https://simonwillison.net/2020/Oct/9/git-scraping/).", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1615/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"} {"id": 1138008042, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5D1J_q", "number": 1636, "title": "\"permissions\" propery in metadata for configuring arbitrary permissions", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 8711695, "label": " Datasette 1.0a2"}, "comments": 14, "created_at": "2022-02-15T00:25:59Z", "updated_at": "2022-12-13T02:40:50Z", "closed_at": "2022-12-13T02:40:50Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "The `\"allow\"` block mechanism can already be used to configure various default permissions. When adding permissions to `datasette-tiddlywiki` I realized it would be good to be able to configure arbitrary permissions such as `edit-tiddlywiki` there too.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1636/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"} {"id": 1125576543, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5DFu9f", "number": 1630, "title": "Review datasette.utils and decide which functions should be documented for 1.0", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-02-07T06:39:52Z", "updated_at": "2022-02-07T06:39:52Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Follows:\r\n- #1176", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1630/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 1126604194, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5DJp2i", "number": 1632, "title": "datasette one.db one.db opens database twice, as one and one_2", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 6, "created_at": "2022-02-07T23:14:47Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-19T04:04:49Z", "closed_at": "2022-02-07T23:50:01Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "> ```\r\n> % mkdir /tmp/data\r\n> % cp ~/Dropbox/Development/datasette/fixtures.db /tmp/data \r\n> % datasette /tmp/data/*.db /tmp/data/created.db --create -p 8852\r\n> ...\r\n> INFO: Uvicorn running on http://127.0.0.1:8852 (Press CTRL+C to quit)\r\n> ^CINFO: Shutting down\r\n> % datasette /tmp/data/*.db /tmp/data/created.db --create -p 8852\r\n> ...\r\n> INFO: 127.0.0.1:49533 - \"GET / HTTP/1.1\" 200 OK\r\n> ```\r\n> The first time I ran Datasette I got two databases - `fixtures` and `created`\r\n> \r\n> BUT... when I ran Datasette the second time it looked like this:\r\n> \r\n> \r\n> \r\n> This is the same result you get if you run:\r\n> \r\n> datasette /tmp/data/fixtures.db /tmp/data/created.db /tmp/data/created.db\r\n> \r\n> This is caused by this Datasette issue:\r\n> - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/509\r\n> \r\n> So... either I teach Datasette to de-duplicate multiple identical file paths passed to the command, or I can't use `/data/*.db` in the `Dockerfile` here and I need to go back to other solutions for the challenge described in this comment: https://github.com/simonw/datasette-publish-fly/pull/12#issuecomment-1031971831\r\n\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette-publish-fly/pull/12#issuecomment-1032029874_", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1632/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"} {"id": 1129052172, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5DS_gM", "number": 1633, "title": "base_url or prefix does not work with _exact match", "user": {"value": 6613091, "label": "henrikek"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2022-02-09T21:45:07Z", "updated_at": "2022-04-28T09:12:56Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "NONE", "pull_request": null, "body": "When i hit \"Apply\" button to search with \"_exact\" for a column syntax the URL prefix is removed from the url.\r\n\r\n![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6613091/153293758-0b757d55-5757-4987-992e-9426e69a7956.png)\r\n\r\nAnd the result is:\r\n![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6613091/153294672-87be7809-bb7b-455d-bf1a-41e90bbfa4ae.png)\r\n\r\nIf I add the marked row to url_builder.py it seams to work:\r\n![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6613091/153295231-bdd52e37-efcf-4b21-9d37-69f182a922f4.png)\r\n", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1633/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 1131295060, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5DbjFU", "number": 1634, "title": "Update Dockerfile generated by `datasette publish`", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2022-02-11T00:07:26Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-11T17:38:08Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "The generated `Dockerfile` currently looks something like this:\r\n```Dockerfile\r\nFROM python:3.8\r\nCOPY . /app\r\nWORKDIR /app\r\n\r\nENV DATASETTE_SECRET 'edab49cbc5d5f6f33238f54852037e3fee710821960b73edd2ce743454182ae2'\r\nRUN pip install -U datasette datasette-auth-passwords datasette-tiddlywiki datasette-graphql\r\nRUN datasette inspect fixtures.db other.db --inspect-file inspect-data.json\r\nENV PORT 8080\r\nEXPOSE 8080\r\nCMD datasette serve --host 0.0.0.0 -i fixtures.db -i other.db --cors --inspect-file inspect-data.json --metadata metadata.json --create --port $PORT /data/*.db\r\n```\r\nThis is still on Python 3.8, and it generates a pretty large image compared to the `Dockerfile` used for https://hub.docker.com/datasetteproject/datasette - https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/0.60.2/Dockerfile\r\n\r\nHere's the code that generates it: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/7d24fd405f3c60e4c852c5d746c91aa2ba23cf5b/datasette/utils/__init__.py#L389-L400", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1634/reactions\", \"total_count\": 2, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 2, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 1157182254, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5E-TMu", "number": 1646, "title": "Configuration directory mode does not pick up other file extensions than .db", "user": {"value": 15640196, "label": "dnsos"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 3, "created_at": "2022-03-02T13:15:23Z", "updated_at": "2022-10-07T23:06:17Z", "closed_at": "2022-10-07T23:03:35Z", "author_association": "NONE", "pull_request": null, "body": "Hello, I've been trying to run Datasette with the [configuration directory mode](https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/settings.html#configuration-directory-mode) with a structure such as this one:\r\n\r\n```plain\r\nsome-directory/\r\n example.sqlite3\r\n another-example.db\r\n one-more.custom\r\n [...]\r\n```\r\n\r\n(In my scenario I can't just change the filename extension without other problems arising)\r\n\r\nNow databases with the `.sqlite3` or the custom filename extension are ignored by Datasette in this case. I'm aware that the docs state that a `.db` extension is required, but I was wondering if there is a reason for restricting this or any workaround available? When I run `datasette example.sqlite3` or `datasette one-more.custom` the databases are served by Datasette without a problem. \r\n\r\n", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1646/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"} {"id": 1142107925, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5EEy8V", "number": 1638, "title": "`filters_from_request` plugin hook docs should mention that returning an async function is allowed", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-02-18T00:08:26Z", "updated_at": "2022-02-18T00:08:26Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "https://docs.datasette.io/en/stable/plugin_hooks.html#filters-from-request-request-database-table-datasette doesn't mention that you can return an `async` function - but you can, and in fact Datasette itself uses that here: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/blob/aa7f0037a46eb76ae6fe9bf2a1f616c58738ecdf/datasette/filters.py#L43-L47", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1638/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 1148638868, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5EdtaU", "number": 1639, "title": "Make datasette-redirect-forbidden unneccessary", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 0, "created_at": "2022-02-23T22:18:46Z", "updated_at": "2022-02-23T22:18:46Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "I wrote `datasette-redirect-forbidden` today because I needed 403 errors to redirect to `/-/login` and it was the quickest way to solve that problem.\r\n\r\nThis should be a feature of Datasette core.\r\n\r\n- https://github.com/simonw/datasette-redirect-forbidden/issues/2", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1639/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 1148725876, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5EeCp0", "number": 1640, "title": "Support static assets where file length may change, e.g. logs", "user": {"value": 57859326, "label": "broccolihighkicks"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2022-02-24T00:34:42Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-05T01:19:25Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "NONE", "pull_request": null, "body": "This is a bit of an oxymoron.\r\n\r\nI am serving a log.txt file for a background process using the Datasette --static CLI. This is useful as I can observe a background process from the web UI to see any errors that occur (instead of spelunking the logs via docker exec/ssh etc).\r\n\r\nI get this error, which I think is because Datasette assumes that the size of the content does not change (but appending new log lines means the content length changes).\r\n\r\n\r\n```python\r\nTraceback (most recent call last):\r\n File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasette/app.py\", line 1181, in route_path\r\n response = await view(request, send)\r\n File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasette/utils/asgi.py\", line 305, in inner_static\r\n await asgi_send_file(send, full_path, chunk_size=chunk_size)\r\n File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasette/utils/asgi.py\", line 280, in asgi_send_file\r\n await send(\r\n File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/asgi_csrf.py\", line 104, in wrapped_send\r\n await send(event)\r\n File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/uvicorn/protocols/http/h11_impl.py\", line 460, in send\r\n output = self.conn.send(event)\r\n File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/h11/_connection.py\", line 468, in send\r\n data_list = self.send_with_data_passthrough(event)\r\n File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/h11/_connection.py\", line 501, in send_with_data_passthrough\r\n writer(event, data_list.append)\r\n File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/h11/_writers.py\", line 58, in __call__\r\n self.send_data(event.data, write)\r\n File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/h11/_writers.py\", line 78, in send_data\r\n raise LocalProtocolError(\"Too much data for declared Content-Length\")\r\nh11._util.LocalProtocolError: Too much data for declared Content-Length\r\nERROR: Exception in ASGI application\r\nTraceback (most recent call last):\r\n File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasette/app.py\", line 1181, in route_path\r\n response = await view(request, send)\r\n File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasette/utils/asgi.py\", line 305, in inner_static\r\n await asgi_send_file(send, full_path, chunk_size=chunk_size)\r\n File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasette/utils/asgi.py\", line 280, in asgi_send_file\r\n await send(\r\n File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/asgi_csrf.py\", line 104, in wrapped_send\r\n await send(event)\r\n File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/uvicorn/protocols/http/h11_impl.py\", line 460, in send\r\n output = self.conn.send(event)\r\n File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/h11/_connection.py\", line 468, in send\r\n data_list = self.send_with_data_passthrough(event)\r\n File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/h11/_connection.py\", line 501, in send_with_data_passthrough\r\n writer(event, data_list.append)\r\n File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/h11/_writers.py\", line 58, in __call__\r\n self.send_data(event.data, write)\r\n File \"/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/h11/_writers.py\", line 78, in send_data\r\n raise LocalProtocolError(\"Too much data for declared Content-Length\")\r\nh11._util.LocalProtocolError: Too much data for declared Content-Length\r\n```\r\n\r\nThanks, I am finding Datasette very useful.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1640/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 1149310456, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5EgRX4", "number": 1641, "title": "Tweak mobile keyboard settings", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-02-24T13:47:10Z", "updated_at": "2022-02-24T13:49:26Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/StringsTextFonts/Conceptual/TextAndWebiPhoneOS/KeyboardManagement/KeyboardManagement.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40009542-CH5-SW12\r\n\r\n`autocorrect=\"off\"` is worth experimenting with.\r\n\r\nTwitter: https://twitter.com/forestgregg/status/1496842959563726852", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1641/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 1152072027, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Eqzlb", "number": 1642, "title": "Dependency issue with asgiref and uvicorn", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 1, "created_at": "2022-02-26T18:00:35Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-05T01:11:27Z", "closed_at": "2022-03-05T01:11:17Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "```\r\nERROR: After October 2020 you may experience errors when installing or updating packages. This is because pip will change the way that it resolves dependency conflicts.\r\n\r\nWe recommend you use --use-feature=2020-resolver to test your packages with the new resolver before it becomes the default.\r\n\r\ndatasette 0.60.2 requires asgiref<3.5.0,>=3.2.10, but you'll have asgiref 3.5.0 which is incompatible.\r\n```\r\nThat's after I forced an upgrade of `uvicorn` due to this warning:\r\n```\r\nERROR: After October 2020 you may experience errors when installing or updating packages. This is because pip will change the way that it resolves dependency conflicts.\r\n\r\nWe recommend you use --use-feature=2020-resolver to test your packages with the new resolver before it becomes the default.\r\n\r\nuvicorn 0.13.1 requires click==7.*, but you'll have click 8.0.4 which is incompatible.\r\n```", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1642/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"} {"id": 1154399841, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5Ezr5h", "number": 1645, "title": "Sensible `cache-control` headers for static assets, including those served by plugins", "user": {"value": 697092, "label": "curiousleo"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 4, "created_at": "2022-02-28T18:12:03Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-08T02:59:29Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "NONE", "pull_request": null, "body": "## What I'm seeing\r\n\r\nWith `default_cache_ttl = 86400`, I see the following:\r\n\r\nA table view returns `Cache-control: max-age=86400`:\r\n\r\n![Screenshot_20220228_190000](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/697092/156034352-4d64683e-39c8-49af-81df-0217a5957bbd.png)\r\n\r\nA static asset returns no `Cache-control` header:\r\n\r\n![Screenshot_20220228_185933](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/697092/156034363-d0b03cc2-5889-4ed2-b601-8c1846b8469a.png)\r\n\r\n## What I expected to see\r\n\r\nI expected the static asset to return a `Cache-control` header indicating that this response can be cached.\r\n\r\n## Why this matters\r\n\r\nI'm productionising a Datasette deployment right now and was looking into putting it behind a Varnish instance. I was surprised to see requests for static assets being served from Datasette rather than Varnish, this is what led me to look more closely at the response headers.\r\n\r\nWhile Datasette serves those static assets pretty quickly, I don't see why Datasette should serve them. By their nature, static assets like images and JS files are very cacheable, so it should be easy to serve them from a cache like Varnish.\r\n\r\n(Note that Varnish can easily be configured to override this header, enabling caching for static assets. But it would be better if this override was not necessary.)\r\n\r\n## Discussion\r\n\r\nIt seems clear to me that serving static assets without a `Cache-control` header is not ideal.\r\n\r\nI see two options here:\r\n\r\nA. Static assets use the same logic as table / SQL views to set the `Cache-control` header based on `default_cache_ttl`.\r\nB. An additional setting for static assets is introduced (`default_static_cache_ttl`, say).", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1645/reactions\", \"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": null} {"id": 1160407071, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5FKmgf", "number": 1647, "title": "Test failures with SQLite 3.37.0+ due to column affinity case", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 5, "created_at": "2022-03-05T17:37:46Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-05T19:56:28Z", "closed_at": "2022-03-05T19:47:04Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "These three tests are failing on my local machine:\r\n```\r\nFAILED tests/test_internals_database.py::test_table_column_details[facetable-expected0] - AssertionError: assert [Column(cid=0, name='pk', type='INTEGER', no...\r\nFAILED tests/test_internals_database.py::test_table_column_details[sortable-expected1] - AssertionError: assert [Column(cid=0, name='pk1', type='varchar(30)'...\r\nFAILED tests/test_table_html.py::test_sort_links - AssertionError: assert [{'a_href': None,\\n 'attrs': {'class': ['col-Link'],\\n 'data-column': '...\r\n```\r\nI ran `pytest --lf -vv` and the output had things like this in it:\r\n```\r\nE - Column(cid=1, name='created', type='text', notnull=0, default_value=None, is_pk=0, hidden=0),\r\nE ? ^^^^\r\nE + Column(cid=1, name='created', type='TEXT', notnull=0, default_value=None, is_pk=0, hidden=0),\r\n...\r\nE {'a_href': '/fixtures/sortable?_sort=sortable_with_nulls_2',\r\nE 'attrs': {'class': ['col-sortable_with_nulls_2'],\r\nE 'data-column': 'sortable_with_nulls_2',\r\nE 'data-column-not-null': '0',\r\nE - 'data-column-type': 'real',\r\nE ? ^^^^\r\nE + 'data-column-type': 'REAL',\r\nE ? ^^^^\r\n```\r\nSomething is causing column types to come back in uppercase where previously they were lowercase.", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1647/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"} {"id": 1160750713, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5FL6Z5", "number": 1650, "title": "Implement redirects from old % encoding to new dash encoding", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 5, "created_at": "2022-03-06T23:40:02Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-07T19:26:15Z", "closed_at": "2022-03-07T19:26:14Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "> One big advantage to this scheme is that redirecting old links to `%2F` pages (e.g. https://fivethirtyeight.datasettes.com/fivethirtyeight/twitter-ratio%2Fsenators) is easy - if you see a `%` in the `raw_path`, redirect to that page with the `%` replaced by `-`.\r\n\r\n_Originally posted by @simonw in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/issues/1439#issuecomment-1060044007_", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1650/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"} {"id": 1161584460, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5FPF9M", "number": 1651, "title": "Get rid of the no-longer necessary ?_format=json hack for tables called x.json", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "closed", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": {"value": 3268330, "label": "Datasette 1.0"}, "comments": 8, "created_at": "2022-03-07T15:40:42Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-19T04:04:50Z", "closed_at": "2022-03-15T18:25:42Z", "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "Tidy up from:\r\n- #1439", "repo": {"value": 107914493, "label": "datasette"}, "type": "issue", "active_lock_reason": null, "performed_via_github_app": null, "reactions": "{\"url\": \"https://api.github.com/repos/simonw/datasette/issues/1651/reactions\", \"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", "draft": null, "state_reason": "completed"} {"id": 1161937073, "node_id": "I_kwDOBm6k_c5FQcCx", "number": 1653, "title": "Mechanism to default a table to sorting by multiple columns", "user": {"value": 9599, "label": "simonw"}, "state": "open", "locked": 0, "assignee": null, "milestone": null, "comments": 2, "created_at": "2022-03-07T21:20:11Z", "updated_at": "2022-03-07T21:23:39Z", "closed_at": null, "author_association": "OWNER", "pull_request": null, "body": "### Discussed in https://github.com/simonw/datasette/discussions/1652\r\n\r\n